Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I installed the Borla (non-GM) Touring yesterday.  Actually a bit louder than I thought it would be, but sounds great!  When I went out this morning I noticed that there seems to be a drip of water from around one of the clamps?  Anyone know if this is indicative of an exhaust leak or normal?  When I first started it yesterday, I did not hear anything that sounds like an exhaust leak...   

Posted

Has anyone gone ahead and had the joints on their Borla Catback system welded vs. sticking with the clamps?  I have water leaking from the clamps and while I'm almost certain there's no exhaust leak, having the joints welded would ensure that there's no exhaust leak and would eliminate the water leaking from the joints.  Anyone gone this route...any cons?

Posted
Has anyone gone ahead and had the joints on their Borla Catback system welded vs. sticking with the clamps?  I have water leaking from the clamps and while I'm almost certain there's no exhaust leak, having the joints welded would ensure that there's no exhaust leak and would eliminate the water leaking from the joints.  Anyone gone this route...any cons?

I put my Borla Atak cat back on myself and was wondering if I should have it welded, my mechanic said that as long as everything is tightened properly that there should be no problems. I know that there is a small hole in the can for draining, so if you’re experiencing a leak from there I wouldn’t think it’d be a problem, I’ve had no leaks from the joints that I’m aware of after 15k miles with it on, so you may just need to snug things up a bit. I’m no expert, just figured I’d give my two cents worth.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Squiderado said:


I put my Borla Atak cat back on myself and was wondering if I should have it welded, my mechanic said that as long as everything is tightened properly that there should be no problems. I know that there is a small hole in the can for draining, so if you’re experiencing a leak from there I wouldn’t think it’d be a problem, I’ve had no leaks from the joints that I’m aware of after 15k miles with it on, so you may just need to snug things up a bit. I’m no expert, just figured I’d give my two cents worth.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks for chiming in.  Ya, it drips from the hole in the can in addition to most of the joints.  I can actually feel the air blowing out when I put my hand over the hole in the can with the engine running, but can't feel or see anything (other than the drips) coming from the joints.  I'm thinking if there was a true exhaust leak, it would be noticeable...especially with me lying underneath the truck and checking the joints with it running!  Mostly a piece of mind thing for me, since I installed it myself and just want to make sure there are no issues.        

Edited by TRG
Posted
Thanks for chiming in.  Ya, it drips from the hole in the can in addition to most of the joints.  I can actually feel the air blowing out when I put my hand over the hole in the can with the engine running, but can't feel or see anything (other than the drips) coming from the joints.  I'm thinking if there was a true exhaust leak, it would be noticeable...especially with me lying underneath the truck and checking the joints with it running!  Mostly a piece of mind thing for me, since I installed it myself and just want to make sure there are no issues.        

It could also just be humidity in the air, just a speculation, feel free to roast me if I’m wrong


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
10 minutes ago, Squiderado said:


It could also just be humidity in the air, just a speculation, feel free to roast me if I’m wrong


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm not worried about the liquid, as it's just a bi-product of cold air/pipe - hot exhaust.  My concern is around there being an exhaust leak at the clamps and the liquid dripping from them a sign that there indeed is an exhaust leak.  Water leaking out of the tailpipe is a normal occurrence, but not sure if it should be leaking from the clamps/joints.       

Posted
I'm not worried about the liquid, as it's just a bi-product of cold air/pipe - hot exhaust.  My concern is around there being an exhaust leak at the clamps and the liquid dripping from them a sign that there indeed is an exhaust leak.  Water leaking out of the tailpipe is a normal occurrence, but not sure if it should be leaking from the clamps/joints.       

Ah gotcha, not super knowledgeable on the subject but I probably wouldn’t worry about it if it’s in the exit pipes past the muffler, if it’s in the pipes before the muffler there might be cause for worry because of the loss of back pressure, but assuming you still have the factory cats I wouldn’t think there’d be a problem


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Switched up my exhaust from a side exit behind the rear tire to in front of the rear tire. Has a little deeper tone without the extra pipe. Still very little drone and more sound in the cab which I was hoping for. Let me know what you think.

 

VE1dnUcU-113800171.jpg

wGo3sEwz-113807683.jpg

dfbPkobZ-113671847.jpg

G8YTvxeH-113716790.jpg

7ZMNt2Gv-113754476.jpg

Posted
Switched up my exhaust from a side exit behind the rear tire to in front of the rear tire. Has a little deeper tone without the extra pipe. Still very little drone and more sound in the cab which I was hoping for. Let me know what you think.
 
VE1dnUcU-113800171.thumb.jpg.3fba6e22a6e573e4c07a0f3b89a00fd4.jpg
wGo3sEwz-113807683.thumb.jpg.4713bd135051dc740e34ddaaac71d15e.jpg
dfbPkobZ-113671847.thumb.jpg.0269c27f27796c6868147f5b1ed29608.jpg
G8YTvxeH-113716790.thumb.jpg.edc4402ee468486e03bf570eb458026d.jpg
7ZMNt2Gv-113754476.thumb.jpg.6dcc61bf296a01bd97a5d308edfec48f.jpg

Looks great! You should level it out, I’m looking at a BDS leveling kit and if you’re keeping the stock suspension it’ll run you under $150 excluding labor if you’re having someone put it on


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted

Idle clip of my 5.3 with a Black Widow 250 3" in/out muffler and a Corsa 3" in dual 4" out tip.

 

Posted
Idle clip of my 5.3 with a Black Widow 250 3" in/out muffler and a Corsa 3" in dual 4" out tip.
 


Been watching your videos on YouTube! Looking to get a venom 250, can't decide if i want to leave the resonator or not. Cruising speeds at 75 can you still hold a conversation?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted


Been watching your videos on YouTube! Looking to get a venom 250, can't decide if i want to leave the resonator or not. Cruising speeds at 75 can you still hold a conversation?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not familiar with the Venom but I have the Carven R which is practically a straight through muffler and I can hold a conversation just fine.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

Posted
16 minutes ago, jgraves13 said:

 


Been watching your videos on YouTube! Looking to get a venom 250, can't decide if i want to leave the resonator or not. Cruising speeds at 75 can you still hold a conversation?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Yes at cruising speeds it isn't loud at all in the cab.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Gorske said:

Yes at cruising speeds it isn't loud at all in the cab.

Just listened to your new vid plus the older ones where you had it positioned behind the wheel, as well as the before and after the Corsa tip.

 

So, you got rid of the resonator and third cat and only have the muffler.  You say no drone, or minimal drone while cruising on the highway around 70-80mph eh?  This exhaust sounds really good, sounds sick at idle, especially when you put it in D lol these trucks have a good lope to em!!

 

What kind of sound difference did you notice between the single exit and twin exit tip?

 

I'm getting tired of driving around stock and was really hoping to do a Corsa, but I'm now a new home owner and reality is I can easily justify $300 on an exhaust, not $1100 at this time.  I don't want to drive stock for another 2 years or so. I think what I'd do is buy this muffler, take it to a shop and have them remove the factory system and then just fab up a quick cat back out the one side.

 

Edit: just listened to your highway pull vid.... man I miss that sound!!!!

Edited by SkiDooNick700

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...