Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well the right side was dead nuts on but the best I could get the left side was -0.5 so I adjusted the right side accordingly. My caster is wicked high but like I said, that's not necessarily a bad thing. 

 

Truck rides nice and drives straight, I think I'm done messing with the suspension. On to the next project. DSC_0862.thumb.JPG.b05fac0616fa3a79865689177d37fd2f.JPG

Posted
23 minutes ago, qwank said:

Well the right side was dead nuts on but the best I could get the left side was -0.5 so I adjusted the right side accordingly. My caster is wicked high but like I said, that's not necessarily a bad thing. 

 

Truck rides nice and drives straight, I think I'm done messing with the suspension. On to the next project. DSC_0862.thumb.JPG.b05fac0616fa3a79865689177d37fd2f.JPG

You're never done. I just literally a week ago after a year got my suspension dialed in.  And next month it's coming off for a 2.5" level on 33s

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Nasty said:

You're never done. I just literally a week ago after a year got my suspension dialed in.  And next month it's coming off for a 2.5" level on 33s

hahaha I guess that's true 

Posted

Ok, ordered 2" drop shackles and I'm going to pull the block when I install. What shocks do you guys recommend for the drop, or are they even needed at on 3" of drop?

Posted
1 hour ago, Daly said:

Ok, ordered 2" drop shackles and I'm going to pull the block when I install. What shocks do you guys recommend for the drop, or are they even needed at on 3" of drop?

I would use the Belltech 2212FF for a 3'' drop.  

Posted
Ok, ordered 2" drop shackles and I'm going to pull the block when I install. What shocks do you guys recommend for the drop, or are they even needed at on 3" of drop?
I haven't changed the shocks and haven't had any issues.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Posted
Ok, ordered 2" drop shackles and I'm going to pull the block when I install. What shocks do you guys recommend for the drop, or are they even needed at on 3" of drop?
We have two trucks with 3" of drop and both have stock shocks. One truck is a crew cab and the other is a regular cab if that helps.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

Posted
10 hours ago, SirenRed16 said:

We have two trucks with 3" of drop and both have stock shocks. One truck is a crew cab and the other is a regular cab if that helps.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
 

Same here. Wife’s truck is a SIERRA crew cab and mine is a Silverado RCSB both with shackles 6401 and blocks removed. Both are using Stock Shocks with no issues at all. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Daly said:

What about shims? Did anyone need them?

Every truck is differant    you'll know once you do it 

Posted

And if it does need it, typically which shims seem to be working? I'm not against ordering them just in case, I can't have this truck down for too long while I wait for shims to show up. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, Daly said:

And if it does need it, typically which shims seem to be working? I'm not against ordering them just in case, I can't have this truck down for too long while I wait for shims to show up. 

1-4 degree. Just depends 

Posted
On 5/10/2018 at 10:38 PM, Nasty said:

You're never done. I just literally a week ago after a year got my suspension dialed in.  And next month it's coming off for a 2.5" level on 33s

you were right, I took the back down to 6''.  this time I'm done for real now though :lol:

 

46drop.thumb.jpg.fbd8330d70277c27f78f9cec2015b01f.jpg

Posted
1 minute ago, qwank said:

you were right, I took the back down to 6''.  this time I'm done for real now though :lol:

 

46drop.thumb.jpg.fbd8330d70277c27f78f9cec2015b01f.jpg

Me too. I'm not lifting mine. I'm slapping the coilovers in, doing the rear shock relocation and I'm done     I'm to old for ro keep switching 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...