Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, mike14 said:

So i’m about to get some BellTech lowering shackles for my 2014 sierra. My first time ever doing this. Any tips i should hear of? I’ve heard we need to return the shackles bolt torque back to spec, does anybody know what it is?? Thanks in advance!

Welcome to the site.

 

Here is a video for a NBS 19, should be same, looks like the instruction might have the specs.

 

 

Posted
On 6/15/2020 at 8:10 PM, Blitzfergie said:

Good evening everyone. I just bought a 2017 Sierra and looking for drop advice.

2wd/4wd stamped arms

id like a 2F/5R drop for a clean level drop.

From what i've read a 3" difference would achieve this?

my research shows the 1017SP kit would be what i need but thats a 2/4 kit. (2212FF x 2, 6700, 6525, 25004 x 2, 2514)

I was wondering to get the 2/5 im looking for would it be suggested to get (8510 x 2, 6401,6525, 25004 x 2, 2514)

basically swap out the 2212FF 2-4" drop shocks and change them for 8510 5-7" drop

and change the shackles 6700 to 6401 to get the 5" instead of only 4"?

also would it be suggested to get shock extenders?

 

thanks

 

IMG_6301 (002).PNG

Anything after 4 inch drop requires shock extenders I read. Also going from 4 to5 inch drop may require axle flip. It did on my 18 elevation.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Need some help.  I have an issue with the rear wheel/axle that I need help to diagnose and fix.  I have 2" drop spindles in the front and a flip kit for a 4" drop in the rear.  I noticed that the rear wheels have been sliding backwards since I had my truck lowered.  In addition to noticing how the rear wheels sit in the wheel well I also got underneath and the axle has shifted backwards versus the leaf springs.  Not exactly sure what is causing this but suspect I might need to shorten the driveshaft.  Pictures below show the rear wheels on each side and one of the rear axle sitting on the leaf spring being off center (though that can be hard to tell from the photo).  Is this something to be worried about?  What do I need to do to fix it?

IMG_20200712_203529.jpg

IMG_20200712_160653.jpg

IMG_20200712_160734.jpg

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, UofAZCats said:

Need some help.  I have an issue with the rear wheel/axle that I need help to diagnose and fix.  I have 2" drop spindles in the front and a flip kit for a 4" drop in the rear.  I noticed that the rear wheels have been sliding backwards since I had my truck lowered.  In addition to noticing how the rear wheels sit in the wheel well I also got underneath and the axle has shifted backwards versus the leaf springs.  Not exactly sure what is causing this but suspect I might need to shorten the driveshaft.  Pictures below show the rear wheels on each side and one of the rear axle sitting on the leaf spring being off center (though that can be hard to tell from the photo).  Is this something to be worried about?  What do I need to do to fix it?

IMG_20200712_203529.jpg

IMG_20200712_160653.jpg

IMG_20200712_160734.jpg

You are missing a plate that holds the u bolts in place. And the u bolts are going the wrong way.  U bolts should open towards the ground.

See picture below of plate and u bolt orientation. Who installed the kit? A shop? If so I would get you money back or have them fix it because you kit is installed incorrectly according to your picture.

 

unnamed.jpg

Edited by SlowGMC
Posted
17 hours ago, SlowGMC said:

You are missing a plate that holds the u bolts in place. And the u bolts are going the wrong way.  U bolts should open towards the ground.

See picture below of plate and u bolt orientation. Who installed the kit? A shop? If so I would get you money back or have them fix it because you kit is installed incorrectly according to your picture.

 

unnamed.jpg

Thanks for the help.  I did have a shop do it and I will take it back to them to get it fixed.

Posted (edited)
On 7/13/2020 at 3:17 AM, SlowGMC said:

You are missing a plate that holds the u bolts in place. And the u bolts are going the wrong way.  U bolts should open towards the ground.

See picture below of plate and u bolt orientation. Who installed the kit? A shop? If so I would get you money back or have them fix it because you kit is installed incorrectly according to your picture.

 

 

In looking more into the issue, the top plates are not to be found.  Since they installed the bottom plate on top they didn't install the top plates anywhere and did not return them to me with the other parts.  I have tried searching online to see if I can just find the 2 top plates but haven't had much luck.  I plan to try to call the different kit makers to see if any of them can help but figured it made sense to see if perhaps anyone in this group might have extras or a better suggestion for tracking the plates down.  Thanks in advance.

 

Edited by UofAZCats
Posted
1 hour ago, UofAZCats said:

In looking more into the issue, the top plates are not to be found.  Since they installed the bottom plate on top they didn't install the top plates anywhere and did not return them to me with the other parts.  I have tried searching online to see if I can just find the 2 top plates but haven't had much luck.  I plan to try to call the different kit makers to see if any of them can help but figured it made sense to see if perhaps anyone in this group might have extras or a better suggestion for tracking the plates down.  Thanks in advance.

 

Call the manufacturer directly. I was one time looking for a part included in the kit(i use belltech flip kit) and could not find it even in their website. I think that was the same part you are looking, U bolt Spring Pad Mount, part number 6521-004). Out of frustration, I ended up calling Belltech directly. And i got the part i needed. It was explained to me that the specific part, like the plate you’re looking, will not show up in their website but you can actually buy it directly from them. 

Posted
2 hours ago, UofAZCats said:

In looking more into the issue, the top plates are not to be found.  Since they installed the bottom plate on top they didn't install the top plates anywhere and did not return them to me with the other parts.  I have tried searching online to see if I can just find the 2 top plates but haven't had much luck.  I plan to try to call the different kit makers to see if any of them can help but figured it made sense to see if perhaps anyone in this group might have extras or a better suggestion for tracking the plates down.  Thanks in advance.

 

Yea like previous guy said go to the manufacturer of kit and call them. Each kit is different and I'm not sure how interchangeable parts are from different shops on flip kits. 

Posted

l recently purchased a 2014 single cab silverado truck with 2” inch spindles and springs with a flip kit that made it into a 4/6 drop. I wanted to fix my camber problem, so l was recommended these kit from beltech. The beltech part number is #4957. I had a shop put the part on and, I brought it to an alignment place and they said that they couldn’t put my wheels straight and my eccentrics where already maxed out. Any thoughts of how l could fix this problem? Picture shows how my truck is right now.

5341D4B8-4619-4D69-B743-1FECB4744A28.jpeg

Posted

Are you sure the shop installed these correctly? 
 

With just a 4/6, you should be dang near 0 as is or at least under -1
 

I would make sure they were installed correctly, usually the bushing kit should be rotated inward to the frame so it pushes the a arm out. The camber plate kit needs to have the factory slot lengthened to take full advantage. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Brian Hinojosa said:

l recently purchased a 2014 single cab silverado truck with 2” inch spindles and springs with a flip kit that made it into a 4/6 drop. I wanted to fix my camber problem, so l was recommended these kit from beltech. The beltech part number is #4957. I had a shop put the part on and, I brought it to an alignment place and they said that they couldn’t put my wheels straight and my eccentrics where already maxed out. Any thoughts of how l could fix this problem? Picture shows how my truck is right now.

5341D4B8-4619-4D69-B743-1FECB4744A28.jpeg

Same reaction just like @sharkeysierra. My set up used is the Belltech lowering products set at 4/6 and had my alignment spot on. It did not require me to change or use an Alignment Kit (e.g. Front Camber Bushing). Nevertheless, wether you use same brand as I did or other else, a 4/6 is a 4/6 drop. I am now wondering, you even had an Alignment Kit added yet wasn’t able to meet specifications, I suggest it is worth checking again how the kit was installed coz there must be something wrong in that sense, what do you think?

Posted
39 minutes ago, sharkeysierra said:

Are you sure the shop installed these correctly? 
 

With just a 4/6, you should be dang near 0 as is or at least under -1
 

I would make sure they were installed correctly, usually the bushing kit should be rotated inward to the frame so it pushes the a arm out. The camber plate kit needs to have the factory slot lengthened to take full advantage. 

I’ll go back to shop, l was thinking about probably they didn’t put a right bushing in or something. This is a picture after the shop installed the kit before getting the alignment done

AA633AE1-4E51-4EC4-AD59-F6FEF34D1CA7.jpeg

Posted

Yeah, if they installed it, they didn’t do it right because the camber and caster are the same. 
 

take a picture of your camber plates at minimum and post it here? The camber plates, the slot is supposed to be extended another .25 - .5 inch. I’m almost willing to bet they did not do this. The bushings May have had to be glued in, if not pressed in. They will turn if not done properly. I had a set of DJM camber bushings, they had to be glued in to stay. I thought I did it right the first time and after left the shop, before I got home the bushing turned on me and sucked my wheel in negative camber. 
 

At 4/6, the plates or the bushings should get you into alignment alone and both together will get you far positive. 

 

I do know when I was 4/6 with upper and lower a arms, the camber was within .1 - 2 of factory spec in camber. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, sharkeysierra said:

Yeah, if they installed it, they didn’t do it right because the camber and caster are the same. 
 

take a picture of your camber plates at minimum and post it here? The camber plates, the slot is supposed to be extended another .25 - .5 inch. I’m almost willing to bet they did not do this. The bushings May have had to be glued in, if not pressed in. They will turn if not done properly. I had a set of DJM camber bushings, they had to be glued in to stay. I thought I did it right the first time and after left the shop, before I got home the bushing turned on me and sucked my wheel in negative camber. 
 

At 4/6, the plates or the bushings should get you into alignment alone and both together will get you far positive. 

 

I do know when I was 4/6 with upper and lower a arms, the camber was within .1 - 2 of factory spec in camber. 

 

EAE494BC-5D3F-49E3-88FF-3898C184460E.png

Posted

Yeah they installed it wrong, and I want to say backwards. 
 

AND

 

you are missing the pin the supposed to sit in that slot. I put a couple yellow dots where that pin supposed to be. 1494692F-7111-48C8-83D1-6DFFEA4FE078.jpeg.c1fa9145010aa00881db00de6da04f24.jpeg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 1 Anonymous, 636 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...