Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Just strapped on an Extang Solid Fold today. I'll let you guys how I like after ome use.

 

So far, I'm impressed. (the shop I bought it from said that it was from a 2013----but seems to fit the 2014 fine). Any one know the difference?

Edited by 14'SilveradoLT
Posted

Got a 2014 Sierra crew short box 2 weeks ago or so. Haven't gotten around to trying it and I highly doubt it but gonna ask just to make sure.

Does any one know if the Truxedo Lo Pro off my 2011 fit the 2014?

 

Thanks

Posted

If you have the same size bed (Ie 5'6" or 6'6") then yes it will fit. The difference is less than 1/2" on the length and width. I took my Extang cover from my 2010 and put it on my 2014.

Posted

If you have the same size bed (Ie 5'6" or 6'6") then yes it will fit. The difference is less than 1/2" on the length and width. I took my Extang cover from my 2010 and put it on my 2014.

 

Thanks, I'll try putting it on this weekend.

Posted

I got the Gator Trifold.. Not super impressed with the build quality but it is a budget trifold. So I didnt expect top notch quality. I hate the center section bars that are arched but it is what it is.. One day i'll flip for a hard fold.

Posted

Just had one installed on my 2014 Chevy Silverado! Am loving this thing so far!

 

 

post-126615-0-91291000-1400275369_thumb.jpg

post-126615-0-90545400-1400275371_thumb.jpg

post-126615-0-41067300-1400275373_thumb.jpg

post-126615-0-91291000-1400275369_thumb.jpg

post-126615-0-90545400-1400275371_thumb.jpg

post-126615-0-41067300-1400275373_thumb.jpg

post-126615-0-91291000-1400275369_thumb.jpg

post-126615-0-90545400-1400275371_thumb.jpg

post-126615-0-41067300-1400275373_thumb.jpg

post-126615-0-91291000-1400275369_thumb.jpg

post-126615-0-90545400-1400275371_thumb.jpg

post-126615-0-41067300-1400275373_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted

Question, I like the concept, but I have the backflip I haul dirtbikes in my bed most of the time and I like a cover that allows access to the far front of the bed, because I need every inch of it in order to fit 2 dirtbikes and still fold the tailgate up.

my only complaint with the backflip is

its heavy to fold up

it blocks the entire rear window,

and although it gives me 98% of my bed space I still have to loosen the bolts under it and slide it forward a little to gain another inch because the front tire of the bikes usually lands about 3-4 inches from the bed wall at the top of the bed.

 

my question is, will this cover roll forward any more than what is shown in your picture?

could it be rolled farther so it sits on the front head rail of the bed?

Posted (edited)

 

If you read through this whole thread you'll see that some like it, some have had problems, and others have sworn off the due to bad customer service / experience with prior products.

 

For the same price, I picked up a Fold-a-Cover G4 elite and am happy with it.

 

I need:

 

a hard folding tonneau 3 or 4 section

that is secure as can reasonably be for locking stuff when parked on a city street

waterproof

doesn't cover my stake bed holes

is easy/quick to remove and replace when need be

allows the tailgate to open and shut without screwing with it.

 

The G4 Elite looks like that may be my best/only answer, but even it looks like I would have to unbolt it up front and it looks heavy. I have the optional Chevy semi hard tonneau but the darn thing covers the bed stake holes! Stupid! And I have to crawl up in there to unscrew the knobs from the front attachments. And the rear attachments are a bit difficult to operate compared to a regular latch, plus I lock them to feel safer. PIA

Edited by Mad Max
Posted

I need:

 

a hard folding tonneau 3 or 4 section

that is secure as can reasonably be for locking stuff when parked on a city street

waterproof

doesn't cover my stake bed holes

is easy/quick to remove and replace when need be

allows the tailgate to open and shut without screwing with it.

 

The G4 Elite looks like that may be my best/only answer, but even it looks like I would have to unbolt it up front and it looks heavy. I have the optional Chevy semi hard tonneau but the darn thing covers the bed stake holes! Stupid! And I have to crawl up in there to unscrew the knobs from the front attachments. And the rear attachments are a bit difficult to operate compared to a regular latch, plus I lock them to feel safer. PIA

 

Yes, the G4 requires the removal of (4) bolts to pull the cover off completely, weight is around 50 lbs give or take for the panels when removing them and they strap together nice and easy so for me it's not a problem to pull them off but someone else may have different feelings. I haven't had to remove them yet, but I installed them by myself so shouldn't be an issue. As a side note, I would add that when I open/close the tailgate, I normally do quickly open/close the back panel because otherwise when you shut the tailgate the back leaf weatherstrip will fold under the panel, popping up the back panel then shutting again puts the weatherstrip where it should be.

Posted

I need:

 

a hard folding tonneau 3 or 4 section

that is secure as can reasonably be for locking stuff when parked on a city street

waterproof

doesn't cover my stake bed holes

is easy/quick to remove and replace when need be

allows the tailgate to open and shut without screwing with it.

 

The G4 Elite looks like that may be my best/only answer, but even it looks like I would have to unbolt it up front and it looks heavy. I have the optional Chevy semi hard tonneau but the darn thing covers the bed stake holes! Stupid! And I have to crawl up in there to unscrew the knobs from the front attachments. And the rear attachments are a bit difficult to operate compared to a regular latch, plus I lock them to feel safer. PIA

 

Unfortunately the G4 Elite DOES cover the stake holes. Covers the fronts fully and the backs partially. This actually caused me headache during install as I thought I'd done something wrong alignment wise. The cover is just wider at front than at the rear. I wish they would have mentioned it in the instructions as it add probably 30% to my install time, taking it off, making sure I hadn't made a mistake, etc.

 

I found there was no perfect tonneau choice if you wanted water tight and a reputable company. It's a series of compromises, you just have to find what works best for you. For me it was the G4 and I do not regret it.

Posted (edited)

Do you think it could be modified/cut so it doesn't cover any of the stake holes? I want to mount some ham and cb antennas there. Also would work better for the occasional ladder rack usage. Nuts! Especially surprising considering the new built in bumper step you are supposed to use in conjunction wit the rear stake pocket as a handle - now covered by a stock Chevy tonneau cover. Go figure - GM geniuses. Leave it up to us to figure out how to make them work together....

Edited by Mad Max
Posted

Installed my Extang Revolution cover over the weekend. Install was super easy and seems to seal up really well. I didn't even install the included weather stripping and it seems to be pretty water tight.

 

It is a roll up cover with no velcro and no snaps. Very easy on the wallet for a middle of the road cover and looks really good with the low profile style.

 

20140517_100736_zps5ivclnld.jpg

Posted

Had an Extang Trifecta no problems with it, but it bugged me rippling in the wind. Just upgraded to the Extang Solid Fold. I had one on my 2008 Dakota and never had a leak of any kind. I'm sure it will be great on my 2014 Silverado.

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...