Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

2015 Sierra 1500 4WD

2.5" Leveling Kit

1.5" Zone Body Lift

22x12 Hostile Switcheblades ( -44 Offset )

305/40R22 Cooper Zeon LTZ

Slight Rub at full lock in reverse - Normal driving has no rubbing

 

IMG_0916_zpsvc4oilcy.jpg

 

B797A8CA-D576-4FB5-AF40-2DCEF93CA81A_zps

 

IMG_0907_zpsy11y1pyz.jpg

 

F4059979-9F76-4680-BA51-B79661F893AA_zps

 

Love it man, turned out great. Your truck makes me want tow's so bad tbh.

  • Like 1
Posted

Nitto Terra Grappler G2 295/60/r20 with 2.5 RC level

post-148837-0-64424600-1448143570_thumb.jpeg

post-148837-0-64424600-1448143570_thumb.jpeg

post-148837-0-64424600-1448143570_thumb.jpeg

post-148837-0-64424600-1448143570_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 3
Posted

Nitto Terra Grappler G2 295/60/r20 with 2.5 RC level

You sure about that size? That's almost 34" tires with just an 2.5 level? pretty awesome-blossom if you ask me!

Posted

Just installed my 2.5" Rough Country Kit, with the block in the rear...also added BFG KO2's, 275/65-r20 on the factory wheels

post-145381-0-32379500-1448206801_thumb.jpg

post-145381-0-90000200-1448206846_thumb.jpg

post-145381-0-32379500-1448206801_thumb.jpg

post-145381-0-90000200-1448206846_thumb.jpg

post-145381-0-32379500-1448206801_thumb.jpg

post-145381-0-90000200-1448206846_thumb.jpg

post-145381-0-32379500-1448206801_thumb.jpg

post-145381-0-90000200-1448206846_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

295/60/r20 NItto terra grappler g2.

Love my G2 graps too! Just curious why you chose that sidewall?

Posted

I liked both designs but i really didn't have a preference as to which was going to be seen. As long as all 4 were the same lol

Posted

I liked both designs but i really didn't have a preference as to which was going to be seen. As long as all 4 were the same lol

i Gotcha. Im running the opposite "lightning Bolts" vs "Axe Heads". :cheers:

Posted (edited)

2.5 Leveling kit, 3" rear Blocks, 20x9 BMF Novakanes 0 offset, 295/55R20 Nitto Trail Grapplers, No rub, Global QDP Ceramic18% Tint, Amp Research Powersteps

2015-10-10%2011.32.52_zpsbjnndyy5.jpg

Edited by LivNLo94
  • Like 10
Posted

c7fde3dbde55311462297a1224e1fafc.jpg

 

Chillin

 

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Are those KO2s? Will you run them all winter

 

I have them too but just put on my real snow tires. I do lots of highway driving through the hills where it gets icey and didn't know if they could handle that. They seemed fine in the snow though

  • Like 1
Posted

Are those KO2s? Will you run them all winter

 

I have them too but just put on my real snow tires. I do lots of highway driving through the hills where it gets icey and didn't know if they could handle that. They seemed fine in the snow though

I will definitely be running them all winter they are awesome mine are 285/65/18 and we got about a foot of snow then icey rain and these baby's handled great... Didn't slide around didn't loose traction much just gripped and went so im not worried at all also took them threw some mud and they were great for me 42097b9907312b89de8fc244d0fa5ea4.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Good looking truck and nice wheels. The 305/45/22 is 32.8 in diameter and the 285/45/22 is 32.2. That's about 9/16" total O.D. and only about 1/4" on sidewall height. I don't see how 1/4" would be too short for your liking or even noticeable by just looking at the tire. The 305 is a bit wider with a 12" tread width compared to 9.5" tread width on the 285. I think the 305 is a little too wide for factory 9" wheels on a stock suspension and is why they rub. The 305 is designed for a 10" rim and will give the "balloon" look on a 9" rim. I'd stick with the 285. I have similar wheels (CK159) instead of your CK158. I'm running Cooper Discoverer SRX 285/45/22. They fit the 9" wheels perfect, were road force balanced and ride

Good info to know but those wheels are 7 spoke not the CK158 wheels

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,893 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...