Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Nice! I guess they brought that option in '17? I know they did it previously on SUVs. Truck looks killer.

They were an option on the 2016's as well.

 

 

Edited by Alexantics
Posted (edited)

Hello everyone, long time lurker, first time poster. :) This site has been very helpful, so I wanted to pay it forward.

 

Just had new wheels and tires put on the truck and figured I would share for future searches. I wanted my truck to fit in the garage still, and it barely clears now, so lifting not an option. I opted for a very minor tire size increase, and they do not rub at all. Suspension is 100% stock, and the truck is a 2015. I may level the front, not sure yet. I actually like the way it looks now, so we'll see.

 

Tires: 275/65/18 General Grabber AT 2. These are only about 1/2" wider and taller than the stock 18" 265's.

Wheels: 18x8.5 Granite Alloy GV6 25mm offset. They are nearly identical to the stock 18" specs (1mm more on offset).

 

wheels1_1280.jpg

 

wheels3_1280.jpg

Edited by ErikB
  • Like 1
Posted

2016 Denali 6.2

Suspension Maxx 2.5" Front Level for Magneride

1.5" Rear Lift

Fuel Vapor 20x9 +1 offset

Nitto Trail Grappler 33x12.50

No Rubbing, No Trimming

post-162743-0-32401900-1473985120_thumb.jpg

post-162743-0-32401900-1473985120_thumb.jpg

post-162743-0-32401900-1473985120_thumb.jpg

post-162743-0-32401900-1473985120_thumb.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

Method NV in the newly released Bronze. Pretty sure I am one of the first to have a set on a 16 Rado.

 

29631284321_b05437b723_k.jpgDSC00361 by Chris Minshall, on Flickr

Edited by PHOSHZL
  • Like 9
Posted

Method NV in the newly released Bronze. Pretty sure I am one of the first to have a set on a 16 Rado.

 

29631284321_b05437b723_k.jpgDSC00361 by Chris Minshall, on Flickr

Nice! If you wanna send those old NV's my way you're more than welcome to! hahaha

  • Like 1
Posted

Method NV in the newly released Bronze. Pretty sure I am one of the first to have a set on a 16 Rado.

 

DSC00361 by Chris Minshall, on Flickr

 

They'll make bronze but have no plans of titanium...dafuq

Posted

Method NV in the newly released Bronze. Pretty sure I am one of the first to have a set on a 16 Rado.

 

29631284321_b05437b723_k.jpgDSC00361 by Chris Minshall, on Flickr

 

I like it! I might have to get a set too.

 

Do you have both the silver and bronze now?

Posted

 

I like it! I might have to get a set too.

 

Do you have both the silver and bronze now?

Yeah, probably gonna sell the machined finish set.

Posted

Well got tires on the old girl this morning. Discount matched a tremendous price on 33x12.50r20 nitto mud grapplers and I jumped on em. 30,760 on the factory tires and the RC 2.5" level. No rubbing I can see or feel lock to lock will update after some more flex and Offroad tests.

Teaser

post-155183-0-18682600-1474121600_thumb.jpeg

post-155183-0-18682600-1474121600_thumb.jpeg

post-155183-0-18682600-1474121600_thumb.jpeg

post-155183-0-18682600-1474121600_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...