Jump to content

Bilstein shocks thread

yanzhixiang

By yanzhixiang
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

JamesAT18 Enthusiast

JamesAT18

Posted
Posted

Installed everything myself. These fronts were a b***h. Removed UCA, steering, sway bar, just to fit. Ball Joint was a pain to separate from the knuckle. But it's beautiful.

Discount Tire price match walmart for a good deal on 295 55 20 

Rubs on full lock

 

5100s all around 

Tuck.jpg

  • Like 3
  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

bwilloby46
bwilloby46

I put the bilstein 5100s on the rear of my 14 High Country with a new 2" block a few weeks ago. Ride is unbelievable compared to stock. Liked it so much I got the adjustable 5100s for my front, remove

schloppy
schloppy

Hello, I'm not new to the forum but I just joined and figured I'd contribute to the community.   2016 Silverado 1500 "Z71" removed rancho's and swapped with Bilstein 5100's all around. So after d

Jullian is not my name
Jullian is not my name

I just got done with installing my 6112's on my 2014 GMC Sierra Crew Cab.  Reading some install guides on here really helped, along with printing some Chilton Repair guide torque specs that I got from

Posted Images

Red_5 Enthusiast

Red_5

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, JamesAT18 said:

Installed everything myself. These fronts were a b***h. Removed UCA, steering, sway bar, just to fit. Ball Joint was a pain to separate from the knuckle. But it's beautiful.

Discount Tire price match walmart for a good deal on 295 55 20 

Rubs on full lock

 

5100s all around 

Tuck.jpg

Your truck looks great.

 

When we removed the stock fronts and installed the 6112 on the highest setting on my '15 Sierra NHT, we only had to disconnect the swaybar on both sides. It was surprisingly easy. I wonder what the differences are?

Edited by Red_5
Snowcamo Senior Enthusiast

Snowcamo

Posted
Posted

On my 14 4x4 WT I only disconnected the sway bar and lifted the strut in place with a jack.

Sent from my LG-G710 using Tapatalk

Slash L86 Enthusiast

Slash L86

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, JamesAT18 said:

Installed everything myself. These fronts were a b***h. Removed UCA, steering, sway bar, just to fit. Ball Joint was a pain to separate from the knuckle. But it's beautiful.

Discount Tire price match walmart for a good deal on 295 55 20 

Rubs on full lock

 

5100s all around 

Tuck.jpg

Stock height or lifted?

Maybe get some wheel spacers either way to prevent the rubbin.

What part is it rubbing on, UCA or liner?

JamesAT18 Enthusiast

JamesAT18

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 9/9/2019 at 6:39 PM, Slash L86 said:

Stock height or lifted?

Maybe get some wheel spacers either way to prevent the rubbin.

What part is it rubbing on, UCA or liner?

2018 GMC All Terrain

Bilstien 5100s all around (front at highest setting)

Stock blocks in back

Stock UCAs

295 55 20 Ridge Grapplers

No Spacers

Minimum Rubbing at FULL lock on UCA

No Trimming

 

Sorry, forgot to mention some of those specs. 

I would like to stay away from spacers as much as possible. 

Edited by JamesAT18
Arnj85 New Member

Arnj85

Posted
Posted

Ive been reading a few pages of replies and questions. But I my question is I have a 15 Silverado crew cab midnight edt. 6.2 ltz z71. And I'm going for the lower sport truck look. I removed the blocks out of the rear and stock up front. Will the 5100 still accept the lower height in the rear or should I use a drop shock in the rear and regular 5100 up front?? 

Thanks 

JamesAT18 Enthusiast

JamesAT18

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Arnj85 said:

Ive been reading a few pages of replies and questions. But I my question is I have a 15 Silverado crew cab midnight edt. 6.2 ltz z71. And I'm going for the lower sport truck look. I removed the blocks out of the rear and stock up front. Will the 5100 still accept the lower height in the rear or should I use a drop shock in the rear and regular 5100 up front?? 

Thanks 

Should accept the removed block fine. The rears don't provide any additional lift. 

Yondu Enthusiast

Yondu

Posted
Posted
On 9/8/2019 at 2:03 PM, Red_5 said:

I haven't done anything else to figure out my odd measurements but after doing more driving, I think the ride is getting even better. I noticed that my body subconsciously tenses up when it knows I'm about to drive over bumps that I hit everyday and the hits just don't seem as bad as they once did. I still have less than 200 miles on the 6112/5160 setup and I'm more pleased everyday.

 

I think I read somewhere that the 6112 springs were softer than the OEM springs and I believe it. The truck does seem to lean slightly more in turns but it isn't bad. The truck now rides like I think a 4x4 truck that had a nearly $60k MSRP should ride. Money well spent. 

This is interesting to me. The 6112 uses a 750lb spring which, imo sounds pretty high. A lot of coilovers use 650-700. Someone posted before that own is 745. 

 

I have the 5100s and don't love them, it's pretty firm. You say the 6112s feel softer than OEM?  Do you have the NHT / max tow package?

Red_5 Enthusiast

Red_5

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Yondu said:

This is interesting to me. The 6112 uses a 750lb spring which, imo sounds pretty high. A lot of coilovers use 650-700. Someone posted before that own is 745. 

 

I have the 5100s and don't love them, it's pretty firm. You say the 6112s feel softer than OEM?  Do you have the NHT / max tow package?

I was talking to my friend about this after I posted the response you quoted and he pointed out that maybe the side to side roll that I think are softer front springs could be the result of higher ride height, I'm not sure. Another element that could be fooling me is that the spring and shock are matched better than OEM which achieves a better ride quality even if stiffer sprung. What I am sure of is that the ride is much better on our far from perfect roads, I've noticed that I drive a lot faster around town and now I need to be more conscious of it where before my truck would be uncomfortable and even unsafe in a few spots to drive even at the speed limit. I still only have a few hundred miles on it but the ride quality just seems to keep improving.

 

My truck does have the NHT package.

Yondu Enthusiast

Yondu

Posted
Posted (edited)

It's also possible your trucks original springs are firmer than typical 1500 GM trucks, so maybe they are softer.  I have a Z71 which has a firmer ride than regular but I don't believe as firm as a NHT truck. I know your front sway bar is thicker too. 

 

I just switched from a 275/60r20 to a 285/70r17.  It's supposed to be 32.8", but it's more like 32.3 and my 275/60r20 was about 32.8.  With 2.5" more rubber (same model tire) it got ride of the harshness I had. 

 

I was hoping for more change and at first it seemed very slight.  After putting a couple hundred miles on it, I'm good with the ride for now.  I went from a harsh riding truck to a firm riding truck. 

 

If positive reviews keep coming in on the 6112, especially in comparison to the 5100s I may consider them next year.  I just wish Bilstein went with a softer spring than 750lbs. 

 

Edited by Yondu
  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
papageoff Enthusiast

papageoff

Posted
Posted

Well, my 5100s have arrived and I was planning to tackle the install this weekend with a buddy.  He used to be an Infiniti tech so he's got access to a wall-mounted compressor.  My plan is to remove the existing 2.25" level kit, set the 5100s on the highest setting and re-use the 3/8" spacer under the 5100 to get back to 2.2" of level.

 

I'm doing this because my truck's had a suspension-related rattle for some time now and has recently started rattling and creaking very badly when the suspension flexes. When we rock the truck side to side, we feel the vibrations from the creak in the shock/spring assembly much more than anywhere else.  So, I am about 60% sure that the problem is in that assembly.  We can also see the top of the shock move in the mount ever so slightly (a few mm, nothing more) when viewed from above.  It's almost like a bushing is failing but I don't know if it's normal or not.  I can't get a clear view of the other side..  The motion I'm talking about is in the center section of part 8 in the diagram.  We'll check the ball joints as well just in case, but I thought 2.25" was supposed to be safe on those. 

 

Should I hold off on the replacement until I can get new top mounts in?  I'd hate to tear it all apart to have to wait a week for parts.  I daily the truck, but I do have alternate vehicles I can use.  If it is the ball joints, should I replace the UCAs with the RC ones or just change out the ball joints with OEM or MOOG units?

 

 

Slash L86 Enthusiast

Slash L86

Posted
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, papageoff said:

Well, my 5100s have arrived and I was planning to tackle the install this weekend with a buddy.  He used to be an Infiniti tech so he's got access to a wall-mounted compressor.  My plan is to remove the existing 2.25" level kit, set the 5100s on the highest setting and re-use the 3/8" spacer under the 5100 to get back to 2.2" of level.

 

I'm doing this because my truck's had a suspension-related rattle for some time now and has recently started rattling and creaking very badly when the suspension flexes. When we rock the truck side to side, we feel the vibrations from the creak in the shock/spring assembly much more than anywhere else.  So, I am about 60% sure that the problem is in that assembly.  We can also see the top of the shock move in the mount ever so slightly (a few mm, nothing more) when viewed from above.  It's almost like a bushing is failing but I don't know if it's normal or not.  I can't get a clear view of the other side..  The motion I'm talking about is in the center section of part 8 in the diagram.  We'll check the ball joints as well just in case, but I thought 2.25" was supposed to be safe on those. 

 

Should I hold off on the replacement until I can get new top mounts in?  I'd hate to tear it all apart to have to wait a week for parts.  I daily the truck, but I do have alternate vehicles I can use.  If it is the ball joints, should I replace the UCAs with the RC ones or just change out the ball joints with OEM or MOOG units?

 

 

UCA replacement would come down to how bumpy the roads are you travel on. Your old ball joint could be messed up from the lift. Get an upgraded one with more travel or switch to uniball if you live where road salt and crap won't harm it.

I would personally leave out the 3/8 spacer. 5100 at max are as high as you should probably go w/o upgrading uca. Plus, it will effect the ride in a negative way.

Definitely get some new top hats(upper strut mounts) prior to assembly just in case. They're not that expensive and you could always return them if old ones are still good. Get oem ones.

Edited by Slash L86
papageoff Enthusiast

papageoff

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Slash L86 said:

UCA replacement would come down to how bumpy the roads are you travel on. Your old ball joint could be messed up from the lift. Get an upgraded one with more travel or switch to uniball if you live where road salt and crap won't harm it.

I would personally leave out the 3/8 spacer. 5100 at max are as high as you should probably go w/o upgrading uca. Plus, it will effect the ride in a negative way.

Well, I live on a dirt road, so yeah bumps are very common for me.

 

I thought I remembered reading that 2.25 was safe for the ball joints but I guess not.  I wasn't aware of upgraded ball joints other than the UCAs that rough country offers.  I don't think I need to go to a uniball.  That seems a bit extreme, but what do I know.

 

 

Slash L86 Enthusiast

Slash L86

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, papageoff said:

Well, I live on a dirt road, so yeah bumps are very common for me.

 

I thought I remembered reading that 2.25 was safe for the ball joints but I guess not.  I wasn't aware of upgraded ball joints other than the UCAs that rough country offers.  I don't think I need to go to a uniball.  That seems a bit extreme, but what do I know.

 

 

Yeah, upgrading uca would give you better ball joint than factory. Think they also make ball joint upgrades for stock uca that allow more movement.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined

  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 494 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • davester
      2015 Silverado 3500 right rear turn indicator failure

      By davester · Posted

      consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • davester
      My First Project and GMC has me stumped

      By davester · Posted

      can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • Chuck FB
      Tire pressure for 37s

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Snowcamo
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By Snowcamo · Posted

      Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...