Jump to content

Bilstein shocks thread

yanzhixiang

By yanzhixiang
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

papageoff Enthusiast

papageoff

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Slash L86 said:

Yeah, upgrading uca would give you better ball joint than factory. Think they also make ball joint upgrades for stock uca that allow more movement.

Anyone make UCAs besides RC?  They say on their site that they're only for lifts/levels > 2.5"  I'm close, but not there.

  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

bwilloby46
bwilloby46

I put the bilstein 5100s on the rear of my 14 High Country with a new 2" block a few weeks ago. Ride is unbelievable compared to stock. Liked it so much I got the adjustable 5100s for my front, remove

schloppy
schloppy

Hello, I'm not new to the forum but I just joined and figured I'd contribute to the community.   2016 Silverado 1500 "Z71" removed rancho's and swapped with Bilstein 5100's all around. So after d

Jullian is not my name
Jullian is not my name

I just got done with installing my 6112's on my 2014 GMC Sierra Crew Cab.  Reading some install guides on here really helped, along with printing some Chilton Repair guide torque specs that I got from

Posted Images

Slash L86 Enthusiast

Slash L86

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, papageoff said:

Anyone make UCAs besides RC?  They say on their site that they're only for lifts/levels > 2.5"  I'm close, but not there.

Of course there are other companies that make them. I don't know very much about ball joint uca as I only looked into uniball ones when doing mine. Try calling up an aftermarket store and asking them what people are using.

Edited by Slash L86
tanner709 Enthusiast

tanner709

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, papageoff said:

 

Anyone make UCAs besides RC?  They say on their site that they're only for lifts/levels > 2.5"  I'm close, but not there.

This is just my opinion, and there are probably more brands available;

 

Lower end:

readylift

rough country

 

middle of the road:

CST

 

higher end:

cognito

camburg racing

zone

 

papageoff Enthusiast

papageoff

Posted
Posted

I got under the truck with my neighbor who is a mechanic and we don't think it's the ball joints. There is some motion in them but it's even on both sides and the noise only comes from the left. Also, when we lever the tire to check you can hear and feel a tap/clunk in the shock shaft.

I'm pretty satisfied that either the shock is damaged or the upper strut mount is. I can't get a hold of any of the upper mounts in under a week so this is on hold for now.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

z71skywalker Enthusiast

z71skywalker

Posted
Posted
On 4/28/2019 at 4:07 PM, z71skywalker said:

Gentlemen,

              Sorry for the late reply as I've had these installed for well over 2 weeks. I've attached some pictures. The truck was completely leveled with the Bilstein 5100s at the highest setting. Front and rear it was spot on.

 

Some notes:

  • As others have said, take your old strut assembly somewhere to get them swapped. We had a hell of a time. We tried a floor mounted spring compressor to no avail, and the rentable threaded rod tool also. I ended up giving up and taking them to a local shop. Much easier, cost around 45 dollars. 
  • The rear installation took about 15 minutes on a lift. Super easy as expected. 
  • The ride has improved so much from the stock Ranchos. Those things are garbage. With the wider stance the truck feels much more stable as well. 
  • This setup rubbed at about 3/4 to full turn, and reverse was almost un-useable. I went and bought the Rough Country Fender Trim pieces and broke out the angle grinder. This was much easier than I thought it would be, and now i have ZERO rub. Full lock turn, full lock reverse. Can't even tell I did it. I saw people doing the NorCal mod but for 17 dollars, the trim plates seemed like the way to go. 
  • This setup is great. Rides great, looks great. I might go with a 4" Fabtech sometime next year. I'm not quite sure. I'm so happy with the ride quality i'm not sure I need to do anything different. I would only consider it to lift the truck up a bit more. 
  • The next day I took my truck to get aligned as it was off pretty bad. I highly suggest getting this checked after doing the install. 

2018 Chevrolet Silverado Z71 Midnight Edition

Tires: Nitto Ridge Grappler 305/55r/20

Wheels: Black Rhino Barstow Matte Black 20x9.5 -18 offset.

 

 

IMG_7013.jpg

IMG_7027_1.jpg

IMG_7023.jpg

IMG_6842.jpg

IMG_6703.jpg

 

Hello All,

              It's been quite awhile (Since April) since I put these on and I wanted to give a quick update. Everything is good, it rides great no complaints. However, I am looking to get into a bigger lift. These are great and the ride is great but its just not high enough. I'm going to go with a 4" lift once I figure out what I need. Anyone else find this leveling kit to not be enough? 

Snowcamo Senior Enthusiast

Snowcamo

Posted
Posted
 
Hello All,
              It's been quite awhile (Since April) since I put these on and I wanted to give a quick update. Everything is good, it rides great no complaints. However, I am looking to get into a bigger lift. These are great and the ride is great but its just not high enough. I'm going to go with a 4" lift once I figure out what I need. Anyone else find this leveling kit to not be enough? 
I have pretty much the same setup and wouldnt change the lift without going 35s. I like the tire fits in the wheel well nicely.

Sent from my LG-G710 using Tapatalk

amxguy1970 Senior Enthusiast

amxguy1970

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, papageoff said:

Well, I live on a dirt road, so yeah bumps are very common for me.

 

I thought I remembered reading that 2.25 was safe for the ball joints but I guess not.  I wasn't aware of upgraded ball joints other than the UCAs that rough country offers.  I don't think I need to go to a uniball.  That seems a bit extreme, but what do I know.

 

 

There is no "safe" number, anything over stock increases wear plain and simple. A 1 inch adds wear and reduces time and the higher you go the worse it can get. Every time I hear someone say a 2 inch level is safe I laugh, it isn't. All that means if the stock ball joints last 150k a 2 inch lift might let them only last 50k or something another, a 1 inch kit might reduce the life to 100k and so on. That isn't a concrete number because roads, driving style and off road ventures also play in to it but anything over stock increases wear. I would take the advice of Slash as you probably wouldn't notice those few tenths of an inch and save some wear on your front end. When I replaced my 1.5 kit with the bilsteins I went with the 3rd setting as 1.2" wasn't going to be noticeably different from the 1.5 I originally had on. Plus, bilsteins are described as a preload lift, so the higher you go the stiffer the ride because the spring is compressed, I figure 1 notch down on mine saved some ride quality over the top setting. Plus I tow and haul and want rake too...

 

Tyler

tanner709 Enthusiast

tanner709

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, amxguy1970 said:

There is no "safe" number, anything over stock increases wear plain and simple. A 1 inch adds wear and reduces time and the higher you go the worse it can get. Every time I hear someone say a 2 inch level is safe I laugh, it isn't. All that means if the stock ball joints last 150k a 2 inch lift might let them only last 50k or something another, a 1 inch kit might reduce the life to 100k and so on. That isn't a concrete number because roads, driving style and off road ventures also play in to it but anything over stock increases wear. I would take the advice of Slash as you probably wouldn't notice those few tenths of an inch and save some wear on your front end. When I replaced my 1.5 kit with the bilsteins I went with the 3rd setting as 1.2" wasn't going to be noticeably different from the 1.5 I originally had on. Plus, bilsteins are described as a preload lift, so the higher you go the stiffer the ride because the spring is compressed, I figure 1 notch down on mine saved some ride quality over the top setting. Plus I tow and haul and want rake too...

 

Tyler

pre-load adjustment, in terms of spacers or struts, compresses the spring and reduces total allowable travel distance as well. Doesn't help with ride combined w/ things you've mentioned

Edited by tanner709
  • Like 1
papageoff Enthusiast

papageoff

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, amxguy1970 said:

There is no "safe" number, anything over stock increases wear plain and simple. A 1 inch adds wear and reduces time and the higher you go the worse it can get. Every time I hear someone say a 2 inch level is safe I laugh, it isn't. All that means if the stock ball joints last 150k a 2 inch lift might let them only last 50k or something another, a 1 inch kit might reduce the life to 100k and so on. That isn't a concrete number because roads, driving style and off road ventures also play in to it but anything over stock increases wear. I would take the advice of Slash as you probably wouldn't notice those few tenths of an inch and save some wear on your front end. When I replaced my 1.5 kit with the bilsteins I went with the 3rd setting as 1.2" wasn't going to be noticeably different from the 1.5 I originally had on. Plus, bilsteins are described as a preload lift, so the higher you go the stiffer the ride because the spring is compressed, I figure 1 notch down on mine saved some ride quality over the top setting. Plus I tow and haul and want rake too...

 

Tyler

I already have larger tires and am not willing to do the work twice if I get rubbing.  The front end is lifted 2.25 inches now with about 1" of rake from my rear add on springs.  It rides fine.  The truck looked like a bloodhound tracking a scent when it was stock and I don't want that look again.  My issue is with a bad shock. 

Slash L86 Enthusiast

Slash L86

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, papageoff said:

I already have larger tires and am not willing to do the work twice if I get rubbing.  The front end is lifted 2.25 inches now with about 1" of rake from my rear add on springs.  It rides fine.  The truck looked like a bloodhound tracking a scent when it was stock and I don't want that look again.  My issue is with a bad shock. 

For sure if you think the tires might rub you probably need the spacer. What size are the tires and do you know the backspacing of the wheels?

I'm assuming you have 4wd?

Neumonic Enthusiast

Neumonic

Posted
Posted

The spacer under the strut changes the geometry and decreases ride quality, I removed mine that provided a 1 1/2” lift in the front allowing my truck an almost level look and replaced the factory Ranchos with the Billy 6112’s and installed them on the 3rd ring, this provided me with a little more than what the 1 1/2” lift spacer had given me and improved my ride greatly, better than when the truck was new. 

Point is, if you want more than a 1 3/4” lift my advice is to go with a different strut combo and a new upper control arm in order to properly achieve your desired height of 2.25” lift. I believe Fox, Icon and King all have options that will work nicely. King would be my choice out of the three but I desire a quality ride vs jarring my fillings out!

papageoff Enthusiast

papageoff

Posted
Posted
For sure if you think the tires might rub you probably need the spacer. What size are the tires and do you know the backspacing of the wheels?
I'm assuming you have 4wd?
It's the stock 18" wheels. I'm not sure about the back spacing. As for the tires they're not much bigger and it'd probably be fine, I just wouldn't want to find out the hard way.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

Slash L86 Enthusiast

Slash L86

Posted
Posted
On 10/18/2019 at 10:08 AM, papageoff said:

It's the stock 18" wheels. I'm not sure about the back spacing. As for the tires they're not much bigger and it'd probably be fine, I just wouldn't want to find out the hard way.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 

Asked about tire size for clearance purposes. Asked about backspacing for aftermarket UCA clearance purposes as well. Make sure do your homework before buying aftermarket uca w/o knowing if they'll clear the stock wheels.

Either way I would lose the strut spacer 

Good luck

tkotx Enthusiast

tkotx

Posted
Posted

Can I go Bilstein 5100's all around with 285/60/R20 on the factory 20's no rub?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...