Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm pretty sure it needs to be matched to your VIN. I would not buy a cheap one off eBay as I doubt they program it. 

 

That said, do you have an iPhone or Android device? If so, you can use navigation via CarPlay or Android Auto. GM's OE navigation is a nice system but it was outdated before it was ever sold. The phone based systems use Google Maps, Waze or other services that are basically always up to date.

  • Like 1
Posted

My '17 SLT came with factory Nav. and I have only messed with it one time. As stated before, the map is probably from 2015 or 16. I recently got an email from GMC saying that I could buy the update thumb drive for $249! GPS is free from a lot of sources, trying to charge someone $249 for a one-time upgrade to a map on a $50k truck is insulting. I hate nickel and dime stuff like that and I know that they could send an update over-the-air if they wanted to. All that being said, If you are looking at an 17/18 LTZ, it seems that it too should come with factory NAV as well as the Android Auto/CarPlay software. I plug my Galaxy S8 in via USB and run the app on the truck's infotainment system. Waze and Google Maps work perfectly w/ turn-by-turn and traffic. They have made some good updates to those apps and it will let you run Pandora and other audio players from the truck as well.

  • 9 months later...
Posted

I have a 2014 Silverado. 

I can Bluetooth my android phone and make hands free calls, xm radio, spotify, etc. My issue is I can only get turn by turn directions on Google maps, through my link, while I am using my phone as input. Turn by turn through my link won't work while using AM/FM or XM

Any fixes for that?

Not interested in paying for  On star Nav

Thanks

  • Like 1
Posted
I have a 2014 Silverado. 
I can Bluetooth my android phone and make hands free calls, xm radio, spotify, etc. My issue is I can only get turn by turn directions on Google maps, through my link, while I am using my phone as input. Turn by turn through my link won't work while using AM/FM or XM
Any fixes for that?
Not interested in paying for  On star Nav
Thanks

I’ve only used iPhone maybe it’s different. I only use my phone and Bluetooth for music and navigation. Down load iHeartRadio, Pandora to your phone and have music and turn by turn through your phone and Bluetooth . Or turn off the Bluetooth on your phone. The turn by turn will come through your phone and music through your truck radio. I’ve never tried anything else. I only use my phone, and Bluetooth. I don’t listen to the radio.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)
On ‎1‎/‎12‎/‎2020 at 12:47 AM, Kev4Vols said:

I have a 2014 Silverado. 

I can Bluetooth my android phone and make hands free calls, xm radio, spotify, etc. My issue is I can only get turn by turn directions on Google maps, through my link, while I am using my phone as input. Turn by turn through my link won't work while using AM/FM or XM

Any fixes for that?

Not interested in paying for  On star Nav

Thanks

If I read your question right, you want the turn by turn from your phone to play over your stereo while listening to something other than Bluetooth from your phone. 

 

To do this, pull up your Bluetooth on the phone and look for the "I in the circle" icon.  Click it and scroll down.  There should be an option that has to do with playing over the car.

 

Also, within google maps anyway, there is a set of options available while it is connected to the car.  Swipe up on the phone (while map is displayed) and the options will appear.  Look for something about audio or Bluetooth.  Within that there is "Allow HFP prompts" or something that you have to toggle on.  I believe in apple maps it's similar.  I don't have my phone in front to give you exact directions but you'll find it.

 

 

IMG_1951.thumb.jpg.aa07ffb119779c4f8c318d00c1411065.jpg

IMG_1949.jpg

IMG_1950.jpg

Edited by mikemcclain8
  • Like 1
  • 1 year later...
Posted

Hey guys if you want to do this upgrade, I suggest talking to the guys at Coastal Flash out of Victoria BC, Canada. I shipped some parts over to them and they had them programmed and back in 3 days. They also have pre-programmed kits as well. The guys are extremely helpful and can send step by step instructions on how to install it.

they also ship to the USA as well. 

Posted

We rarely (almost never) use the NAV in either of our vehicles.  We use our phones and tablets more than anything.  Plus, the software is OUT OF DATE in both of our vehicles. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...