Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Will the Rev2 harness work on the GMC Canyon/ Chevy Colorado with the 4 wire connection?

It will not.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
On 3/7/2018 at 10:14 AM, pgamboa said:


Holy moly! It’s gotta be the extra ridge. LOL. Let us know.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How do I know if my 2018 Sierra SLT has the newer mat?

 

My iPhone 6s Plus doesn’t even fit in the space or support wireless charging. I am due for an upgrade though...

Posted
How do I know if my 2018 Sierra SLT has the newer mat?
 
My iPhone 6s Plus doesn’t even fit in the space or support wireless charging. I am due for an upgrade though...

Count the # of ridges on your mat. If you count 10, you should have the newer module. You can also remove the cover under the lid.. but I fairly certain a that all 2018s have the newer module. But it’s GM.. so would verify it for myself.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I count 10 or 11 depending on where you start lol. Build date 12/2017. 

 

 

25CD5928-D969-456D-8714-8A2E6241A48C.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted
I count 10 or 11 depending on where you start lol. Build date 12/2017. 
 
 
25CD5928-D969-456D-8714-8A2E6241A48C.thumb.jpeg.2c007fe43939be345908e92e1e3ed6e8.jpeg

Looks like the 2018 mat. You should have the 2018 module that we are all upgrading to.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Just installed the 2018 module and rev2 cord (Thanks Phil!!). Took about 20 minutes and watching the video from Phil before made it super easy.

This was installed on a 2017 Chevy Tahoe and my phone is an iPhone X. Works perfectly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

@pgamboa I should have bought one of your harnesses.  I was trying to repin the connector and broke one of the electrical pins.  Could you tell me what you purchased to replace one of the pins? Thanks.

  • Like 1
Posted
[mention=159655]pgamboa[/mention] I should have bought one of your harnesses.  I was trying to repin the connector and broke one of the electrical pins.  Could you tell me what you purchased to replace one of the pins? Thanks.

Sorry to hear. These pins are very fragile. Without the right crimp tools or extraction tools, this can easily happen.

Send me a PM and will help ya out.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 5 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

My turn.......have a 2015 GMC Sierra Denali 2500 HD without wireless charging.....yet

 

#1 - Will I find a harness in my console or will I splice into the cig lighter for power?

#2 - If I purchase the 2018 charging module... will it mount under my center console lid or do I need a Wireless Charging Console Mount PN (P)012001866AA?

 

 

Edited by Sirshopolot
add vergage
Posted
My turn.......have a 2015 GMC Sierra Denali 2500 HD without wireless charging.....yet
 
#1 - Will I find a harness in my console or will I splice into the cig lighter for power?

If your truck came with the factory full center console, it will most likely not have the provisions on the mating side of the connector up front. So even with swapping the center console harness itself may not work. You’re probably better off splicing the the rear cigarette lighter plug.


#2 - If I purchase the 2018 charging module... will it mount under my center console lid or do I need a Wireless Charging Console Mount PN (P)012001866AA?
 
Not sure on this either. I highly doubt a non-wireless charging lid will have the provisions for the mount. I wonder what would be involved with retrofitting a mount.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • It's official. Chevy pulled the covers off the next-gen 2027 Silverado 1500, and we got the first official look.   Full breakdown here: https://www.gm-trucks.com/2027-chevrolet-silverado-official-first-look-specs/   The quick hits: LT is dead. The new core trim is just called "Silverado." Two new V8s, a 5.7L and a 6.6L. No horsepower or torque numbers yet. The 2.7 TurboMax finally gets the 10-speed. ZR2 moves to standard 35s with front and rear lockers. Over 60 inches of dash display on ZR2 and High Country, passenger screen included. Seven trims, three lifted from the factory: ZR2, Trail Boss, and a new Custom Trail Boss.   So let's get into it: 5.7 and 6.6 instead of holding out for a 6.7. Right call? Killing the LT name after all these years: bold, or a mistake? Does the new look land for you, or is it too safe? No power numbers at reveal. Smart tease, or frustrating? What are you ordering on day one?   Drop your first impressions below. 
    • LOL west coast they need to see what the midwest actually has.  We have been holding at 2.99 for a few weeks now.  Even by work they have come down to 3.02 for the past week.
    • Diesel or gas?  The 37s will obviously, drastically reduce mpg, but the gasser will take a bigger hit to mpg, and power.  Rough guess, but I'd estimate at least a  2mpg hit on the diesel, and up to 4on the gasser. Maybe more.    I wouldn't sweat a gear change on a duramax at all, and unlikely on the gasser either. You're obviously not concerned with acceleration or towing, and the 10spd will find itself in the right gear without much hunting, if any.    If towing, mpg and acceleration are a concern, you're doing the wrong mods.  Either leave it alone, or do the lift/tires and let the chips fall where they may. 
    • I understand. It is disturbing to think a manufacture asks so much and gives so little in engineering support. This is not a GM issues, this is a greed issue and one the ALL practice.    My intent was not to remove the wind from anyone's sail but rather to point out the areas deficient so that they can be discussed with improvements the goal. But to do that you have to know the truth and what that truth is.    The commercial interest are honed in on a few select issues in which they control all the variables and are not forthcoming in the least with their customers about the details. Failure is the only thing that drives these people to improvement. One way not to fail it to manage public "expectations". The set a bar they can clear and put their thumbs under the suspenders with chest puffed.... Only the internal data tells the story fully. As we don't have access to that for decades then we have to generate it ourselves. UOA's with data that matters.  
    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...