Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just purchased this truck after 14 years of ownership of my 2003 Duramax. I kind of figured that my fuel economy wasnt going to be as good, and having owned a 2002 1500HD with the 6.0 motor that had pathetic fuel economy, i was hoping that in 15 years they had improved the fuel economy a bit. Doesnt seem like it right now as im lucky to get 14mpg or so on the interstate and 12 around town.

 

Granted, ive literally only had this truck for 2 days and only have 220 miles on it and its not even broken in yet, BUT, here is my question (since ive only dealt with my Duramax for 14 years), what can i do (relatively inexpensively) to improve fuel economy on this 6.0 motor'd truck? Ive been out of the "gas" world and have no idea what theyre doing to gas trucks these days to improve gas mileage.

 

Oh, and for the record, this is the 6.0 FLEX fuel motor. And i doubt i'll be running much E85 thru it.

Posted

MPG will start slowly coming up after break in. I started noticing the engine working better at around 3200 miles. Staying below 70 on the interstate should net close to 15.5 to 16.5 mpg if your careful. I don't know of any modifications that would improve mpg, really just driving technique. I tried a k&n filter, it did help with down low power but nothing substantial and mpg suffered also drivability suffered. It seemed to confuse the shift logic, I'd get hard shifts when I shouldn't of been. Put the stock filter back in everything went back to normal, not going to use anything but paper filters on this truck.

 

I got a 16.3 average over 400 miles on the interstate trips between Houston and Austin. Using cruise control, staying below 70 as much as possible, and using the brakes as little as possible all help. I basically have to re learn how to drive, you become more of an 18 wheeler driver than a pickup driver with the 6.0 if you want some efficiency.

  • Like 5
Posted

I basically have to re learn how to drive, you become more of an 18 wheeler driver than a pickup driver with the 6.0 if you want some efficiency.

 

Same could be said of any engine/truck. Driving behavior is the biggest factor in MPG.

 

Due to EPA regulations (or whatever gov't agency) the auto manufacturers are forced to maximize efficiency of new vehicles. Not much you can do to improve anything more.

Posted

I get 8-12 in mixed driving in town.. Over half the time pulling 8,000 pounds..

Posted

LoL!! well, you guys pretty much stated what i already had a gut feeling of. They havent changed this motor and its efficiency since i owned one back in 2002. Only difference is the driver. I dont get in a big hurry anymore these days (56 years old) and just retired from my hobby of 15 years of roadracing "them damn crotch rockets", so i had my share of high speeds and it just doesnt do anything for me to do it on a public road anymore so i pretty much stay at or just a tick over the speed limit and when towing my 7500# RV, i stay right at the speed limit.

 

I wasnt sure if a cold air intake, or maybe a programmer would do anything for these engines or not. I know a programmer did WONDERS for my Duramax, almost doubled my MPG and the torque and HP was WAY better than stock.

 

I'm still glad i went with the gasser tho. When i bought my D'Max, diesel fuel was almost .50/gallon cheaper than regular gas and i doubled my MPG over the 6.0 i had before. Of course, i was traveling all over the SE pulling a big race trailer and it made sense. These days, i pull this RV 6-8 times a year and a bass boat a few times a year. I just like the towing capacity of the 2500's over the 1500's is the reason i went with this particular truck. Well, that and the fact i couldnt FIND a damn 1500 in the LT version, they all were the LTZ's which were about 10K more than i gave for this one. Guess i'll just baby it a little more than i would normally and leave it alone.

 

Thanks for the feedback!

  • Like 2
Posted

LoL!! well, you guys pretty much stated what i already had a gut feeling of. They havent changed this motor and its efficiency since i owned one back in 2002. Only difference is the driver. I dont get in a big hurry anymore these days (56 years old) and just retired from my hobby of 15 years of roadracing "them damn crotch rockets", so i had my share of high speeds and it just doesnt do anything for me to do it on a public road anymore so i pretty much stay at or just a tick over the speed limit and when towing my 7500# RV, i stay right at the speed limit.

 

I wasnt sure if a cold air intake, or maybe a programmer would do anything for these engines or not. I know a programmer did WONDERS for my Duramax, almost doubled my MPG and the torque and HP was WAY better than stock.

 

I'm still glad i went with the gasser tho. When i bought my D'Max, diesel fuel was almost .50/gallon cheaper than regular gas and i doubled my MPG over the 6.0 i had before. Of course, i was traveling all over the SE pulling a big race trailer and it made sense. These days, i pull this RV 6-8 times a year and a bass boat a few times a year. I just like the towing capacity of the 2500's over the 1500's is the reason i went with this particular truck. Well, that and the fact i couldnt FIND a damn 1500 in the LT version, they all were the LTZ's which were about 10K more than i gave for this one. Guess i'll just baby it a little more than i would normally and leave it alone.

 

Thanks for the feedback!

 

Don't waste your money on a programmer "box tune" for a gas truck... YES, They do help diesels... Custom tune helped out my 6.0 power and shifting performance big time.. Similar mileage because i'm always in the gas. Yet to cruise on the highway with it.

Posted (edited)

Just purchased this truck after 14 years of ownership of my 2003 Duramax. I kind of figured that my fuel economy wasnt going to be as good, and having owned a 2002 1500HD with the 6.0 motor that had pathetic fuel economy, i was hoping that in 15 years they had improved the fuel economy a bit. Doesnt seem like it right now as im lucky to get 14mpg or so on the interstate and 12 around town.

 

Granted, ive literally only had this truck for 2 days and only have 220 miles on it and its not even broken in yet, BUT, here is my question (since ive only dealt with my Duramax for 14 years), what can i do (relatively inexpensively) to improve fuel economy on this 6.0 motor'd truck? Ive been out of the "gas" world and have no idea what theyre doing to gas trucks these days to improve gas mileage.

 

Oh, and for the record, this is the 6.0 FLEX fuel motor. And i doubt i'll be running much E85 thru it.

Congrad on the new truck, There good solid truck. Mine has pulled whatever I needed.

Edited by crankman
  • Like 1
Posted

curious how much you spent in repairs on the duramax over the years you owned it, and how many miles? the 6.0 saves you money in up-front cost and typically cheaper repair bills, you spend your money at the gas station instead of at the dealer or a repair shop.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I also have the flex 6.0 in a '17 2500. With 3400 miles on the truck now my lifetime average is 13.5 (hand calculated but the DIC shows the same numbers). Normal driving for me is about 35 miles of highway at 70mph with 10 miles or so in city traffic. On highway trips I've seen as high as 17.5 when driving 55-65 through rolling/mountanious terrain. I expect better once long haul, at least until I hitch the trailer on. :)

Edited by Dale L
  • Like 2
Posted

I gave up a 2002 2500hd for my 16' it's not true there are no improvements

  • Like 1
Posted

curious how much you spent in repairs on the duramax over the years you owned it, and how many miles? the 6.0 saves you money in up-front cost and typically cheaper repair bills, you spend your money at the gas station instead of at the dealer or a repair shop.

Well, $5K just 2 years ago on injectors (that needs to be done every 135-150K), this was my second set, first were replaced under warranty at 88K. I'd say since ive owned it, not counting the injectors, ive spent every bit of $6K or more on repairs. The dmax is a GREAT truck, hell, i LOVED that truck, and it didnt "break" often, but when it did, it was "diesel" schitt, and it was EXPENSIVE, hell, the lift pump and fuel control module was a $1500 repair bill alone. None of those repairs are anything "maintenance" items, even just oil changes are almost double what they are on a gasser, and with todays diesels, i dont EVEN wanna fool with that friggin DEF crap.

 

This truck just makes more sense for me. It was over $20K less than what a Dmax would have cost, and that would take a HELL of a long time to make up on fuel savings, especially with diesel being more expensive than regular now. It was a no brainer when i was pulling a 5th wheel 20K miles a year all over the SE United States roadracing motorcycles, but now all i pull is a 10K pound trailer (thats loaded with all gear and golf cart) about 7-8 times a year. After the last injector change on the DMax, i was only getting around 18 on the hwy and 14-15 to and from work everyday, so even tho this truck def isnt going to get the quite as good a fuel economy as my dmax, it is something i can live with. Week to week it will cost a bit more, but i think over the long run, i'll be saving money.

 

Oh, and when i traded it, the rear in would NOT have gotten me home from Tennessee, and would have been another $1500-2000 repair bill at an out of town dealership, hence the REASON i traded it THIS weekend rather than when i got home. Had i been home, i'd have torn it apart myself to see if i could have repaired it cheaper, but i have a feeling it would have been a catastrophic failure leaving me stranded on the interstate, so it was traded on this.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,875 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...