Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yea definitely, the tire size ends up being about 34” tall and 11.6” wide. I did a full NorCal mod and the rubbing is now gone. 

Posted

1.5” lift in the front. Still has a slight rake, not completely level, but I like it. Running a 275/70r18 no rub full lock. Don’t judge my crooked bumper. I still haven’t got the hit and run damage fixed. :(

7838A5EC-0ED8-44B3-A50B-F9182F4BFD7B.jpeg

Posted
11 hours ago, rudyb said:

1.5” lift in the front. Still has a slight rake, not completely level, but I like it. Running a 275/70r18 no rub full lock. Don’t judge my crooked bumper. I still haven’t got the hit and run damage fixed. :(

 

Nice look!  I'm considering 285/70/17 LT's on my truck with a 1.5 level/lift.  I am adding a leaf to my rear springs and installing 1.5" spacers to the front to maintain a stock profile.  I am "beefing" up my truck for a major road trip with our travel trailer.  Did you find the larger, heavier tires to have a significant impact on your mpg's?  I could go with 265's but for a few $ more I can get the larger tires.  

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Donstar said:

Nice look!  I'm considering 285/70/17 LT's on my truck with a 1.5 level/lift.  I am adding a leaf to my rear springs and installing 1.5" spacers to the front to maintain a stock profile.  I am "beefing" up my truck for a major road trip with our travel trailer.  Did you find the larger, heavier tires to have a significant impact on your mpg's?  I could go with 265's but for a few $ more I can get the larger tires.  

Thanks! I have a running spreadsheet for mpg documentation. The numbers did drop, but I have not reprogrammed the ECM or BCM for the change in tire size (looking for advise to get this accomplished), and I have not put a formula in the spreadsheet to correct the value. I’ve had that on my to-do list so I hope to have an accurate answer soon. Something I noticed is that the transmission seems to be confused by the new tire size. I don’t really know how to explain it. It gets about 13mpg when the cruise is set anywhere from 65-69. If I set the cruise on 64 or 71-72 the mileage seems to go up to 17-22. 

Edited by rudyb
Posted (edited)

Before

38845FA3-A8CE-4A84-A886-594C390F8727.thumb.jpeg.7ec6fda1a39d53adcb03277d4446b216.jpeg

after

 

F55899D9-461D-41D8-B9B6-411781C6F2F8.thumb.jpeg.c3ab255bc23f8b1ffbaaaf6d0985b70c.jpeg

1.5” motofab block in the front. 

 

Thinking about Nitto Grappler 33/11.5/20  for tires. 

Edited by SSMUFF
Posted
On 1/31/2019 at 9:45 PM, rudyb said:

1.5” lift in the front. Still has a slight rake, not completely level, but I like it. Running a 275/70r18 no rub full lock. Don’t judge my crooked bumper. I still haven’t got the hit and run damage fixed. :(

7838A5EC-0ED8-44B3-A50B-F9182F4BFD7B.jpeg

I have the same year and same truck. I have the motofab 1.5 up front as well, and have been researching coopers new line of at3’s for new rubber. You have the setup I’m going for. Any way you can grab pictures straight on of the truck to show the width of your tires? Maybe turn your wheel as if your turning left?

im going back and forth with 275/65/18 and 285/65/18, but now you got me going on 275/70/18 due to no rubbing and I can actually see someone with the same exact everything as I have. 

I like the sidewall of the xlt’s better than the lt’s But it’s not a deal breaker, the tire size is going to dictate it.

thanks!

Posted
On 2/1/2019 at 8:31 AM, Donstar said:

Nice look!  I'm considering 285/70/17 LT's on my truck with a 1.5 level/lift.  I am adding a leaf to my rear springs and installing 1.5" spacers to the front to maintain a stock profile.  I am "beefing" up my truck for a major road trip with our travel trailer.  Did you find the larger, heavier tires to have a significant impact on your mpg's?  I could go with 265's but for a few $ more I can get the larger tires.  

From my calculated/corrected odometer numbers I think my math is still buggy, but going off of the trip meter readings at every full-up, it looks like my average MPG went from 17.55 to 16.15. I expected it to be worse!

 

I'm going off of this guy's formula. Again, I think something isn't right, but I can't get my head around it.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, Jgreen2193 said:

I have the same year and same truck. I have the motofab 1.5 up front as well, and have been researching coopers new line of at3’s for new rubber. You have the setup I’m going for. Any way you can grab pictures straight on of the truck to show the width of your tires? Maybe turn your wheel as if your turning left?

im going back and forth with 275/65/18 and 285/65/18, but now you got me going on 275/70/18 due to no rubbing and I can actually see someone with the same exact everything as I have. 

I like the sidewall of the xlt’s better than the lt’s But it’s not a deal breaker, the tire size is going to dictate it.

thanks!

I took a few photos today and tried to grab as many relevant measurements as possible. It was easier for me to upload everything to my blog to keep from getting the thread off topic. Head over to https://roodeebee.blogspot.com/2019/02/silverado-ride-height.html for details. You might be able to go 1" larger diameter than the 275/70r18, but that would probably be pushing it. On my next set I'm probably going to look at going a bit wider just for a tougher look. The next size up in the Cooper AT3 XLT is LT305/65R18. I recommend looking at https://tiresize.com/calculator/ and clicking the "tire comparison" tab. Also go to http://us.coopertire.com/tires/discoverer-at3-xlt.aspx and click "full specs" for all sizes of that model. Good luck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,263 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...