Jump to content

2500Hd Rumors

plumbob98

By plumbob98
in Future GM News & Rumors

Recommended Posts

plumbob98 Enthusiast

plumbob98

Posted
Posted

I know we have to wait 'till 2020 for the release of the new 2500hd, but was curious as to if there's been any new rumors as to if GM is going to be replacing the 6.0 liter V8 in their future heavy duty line up? Very soon I'm looking to upgrade my '01 2500hd with the 6.0 liter, but I'm wondering if it's better to wait on a new gas powertrain or get some deep discounts on 2018 series models. Don't get me wrong the 6 liter has been a very dependable unit, but I've always felt it's lagged in the torque section, especially when pulling loads through the rocky mountains. I'd be willing to a chance of the first model, as I did when I bought my '01 and not interested in Diesels after the government made them so eco-friendly. Thanks for any input or thoughts!!!

diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

I wouldn't be a test pilot for a new model.

 

:)

grizzlyltz Enthusiast

grizzlyltz

Posted
Posted

I hope gm stays with the 6.0, it’s an industrial mill and why change something that’s not broke
My under powered 6.0 pulls 12000lbs through the Rocky’s just fine




Grizzly

redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted

Instead of 360hp/380ft-lb,  how about 445hp/910ft-lb?

 

Nearly 2.5 x the L96 torque level. 

 

:thumbs:

grizzlyltz Enthusiast

grizzlyltz

Posted
Posted
Instead of 360hp/380ft-lb,  how about 445hp/910ft-lb?
 
Nearly 2.5 x the L96 torque level. 
 
:thumbs:

Lol your comparing a L5P to a baby L96


Grizzly
redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, grizzlyltz said:


Lol your comparing a L5P to a baby L96


Grizzly

Yupp.

 

If plumbob98 needs/wants more torque, the solution is out there!

 

Yes, it costs more, but it also trades in for more when it's sold.

plumbob98 Enthusiast

plumbob98

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Believe me I understand about the 6 liter being reliable, I have one. That's not my point, I'm asking if anyone has heard rumors of a new mill as to make a decision on whether or not to wait for the new unit. As I've stated I believe GM makes extensive testing on new mills and that's why I didn't mind being the first in line to buy one in '01, but at the same token I don't believe GM is going to sit back idly and watch the competition surpass them with bigger H.P. and T.Q. numbers. And I'm glad to hear others are happy with traveling in the mountains with their 6 liter, I'm not. Eisenhower pass in Colorado is a bear with the 6 liter and pulling a load. I keep my trucks for a long time and with Ford coming out with the 7-liter and already have an  all aluminum body(I live in the rust belt), it's looking real good. I've also stated the diesel is out, as I'm not interested in them. 

grizzlyltz Enthusiast

grizzlyltz

Posted
Posted
Believe me I understand about the 6 liter being reliable, I have one. That's not my point, I'm asking if anyone has heard rumors of a new mill as to make a decision on whether or not to wait for the new unit. As I've stated I believe GM makes extensive testing on new mills and that's why I didn't mind being the first in line to buy one in '01, but at the same token I don't believe GM is going to sit back idly and watch the competition surpass them with bigger H.P. and T.Q. numbers. And I'm glad to hear others are happy with traveling in the mountains with their 6 liter, I'm not. Eisenhower pass in Colorado is a bear with the 6 liter and pulling a load. I keep my trucks for a long time and with Ford coming out with the 7-liter and already have an  all aluminum body(I live in the rust belt), it's looking real good. I've also stated the diesel is out, as I'm not interested in them. 


I understand what ur laying down but you can’t really compare your 01 to the new 6.0 with the 6 speed tranny vs your 4
All I’m saying is that I’m totally happy with mine and 90% of owners are
If you want aluminum and a 7 go buy a Ford


Grizzly
plumbob98 Enthusiast

plumbob98

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Ok, I've been a GM fan for years. Didn't mean to bring up the Ford name in a GM forum, my bad, but all I'm saying is GM is getting surpassed by numbers and I highly doubt GM is going to sit back and let this keep happening(even an F-150 ecoboost has higher numbers). All I'm saying is just for one moment and take off the GM glasses and see there's other options out there and I'm sure GM is seeing that also. It's a simple question, "IS THERE ANY RUMORS OF A NEW GAS POWERPLANT ON THE HORIZION"??? I already know you're happy with your trucks, so that's a given, but if I'm going to dole out to close to $50-60,000 dollars on a truck, I want to make sure I'm getting the best "GM" option out there!!!! That's all. I'd be pretty upset getting a new truck and the next year they come out with a sweet Torque monster of a gas motor and I'm driving something that's been out for 17 years(H.P. and T.Q. numbers haven't increased that much in these years), less the newer 6 speed tranny. Thanks!!!

dmax_ty Enthusiast

dmax_ty

Posted
Posted

I’m not sure on the gas power plant, but the Duramaxwill still be around backed by a 9-speed Allison. 

2017HD Enthusiast

2017HD

Posted
Posted

There has been much discussion on the forum for the past few years about the 6.0L No plausible rumors have surfaced - lots of suggestions for GM engineers - Turbos, more displacement, better tune, etc. I would think that if there were a major revision in the power plant there would be prototypes being put together now and just like with the L5P Dmax there was speculation based on parts orders from various shops known for doing GM prototypes. There has been nothing on the 6.0L.

 

My 07 HD with the 6.0L was a great improvement over the 5.7L it replaced - made a huge difference in towing my 6000lb Travel Trailer. Now that I have upgraded the TT again (8000lbs) I also upgraded to the DMax - and have not looked back. While the 6.0L could have done the job, I feel that the DMax does it way better.

C/K Man Enthusiast

C/K Man

Posted
Posted

First off, regarding the Ford 7X engine:  Basically the story is that it is a tall deck long stroke 7.3L derivative of the current Ford 6.2L.  7X is supposed to replace the V-10 in the F-450 and larger trucks, so it may not be available in any Ford pickup.

 

Now, about a replacement for the GM L96:  The answer to that question may be found in the Silverado 4500/5500.  The new Chevy medium duty trucks will go on sale later this year, but initially only with the Duramax/Allison powertrain.  However, with the resurgence in gasoline engines for medium duty trucks, I think it's very likely that the 4500/5500 will eventually have a gasoline engine.  In fact, some of the 4500/5500 prototypes that have been photographed have NOT been diesels.  It is a fact that Freightliner and Isuzu both use the L96 6.0L engine in some trucks up to 19,000#'s GVW, but the story that I hear is the L96 will not be used in the new GM/Navistar medium truck. 

 

The new Silverado/Sierra HD pickups are supposed to debut in 2020, which is about the time I expect to see a gas engine in the 4500/5500.       

f8l vnm Senior Enthusiast

f8l vnm

Posted
Posted

6.0 is last in hp and last in tq. And last in towing in its class. Look it up pick up trucks did an extensive test and 6.0 was well a dinosaur. Yes I know it’s a rock and reliable but after 18 years it’s time for something new.  I know some grizzly and some others will disagree but it’s ancient 

sdeeter19555 Senior Enthusiast

sdeeter19555

Posted
Posted

I've been thinking about this some, since I will be in the market myself about that time...it really has no benefit for GM to offer a different gas option.

If they offer a big gasser, they will lose Duramax sales...and those command a pretty penny...

I would like to see a larger displacement option, but I doubt we will see it. If anything, we would probably see an upgrade to meet current emissions requirements...


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

C/K Man Enthusiast

C/K Man

Posted
Posted

I think that GM will offer a gas option for the 4500/5500, and I think it is likely the L96 will be replaced in the 2500/3500 at some point, my guess is with the same engine in the new medium duty trucks.  A lot of large fleets are going back to gasoline, the economics of diesels no longer work out for them.  Sure diesels have a power advantage, but they no longer have a fuel economy advantage, they are less reliable than gasoline now and the are VERY expensive to fix.  Also, gasoline engines are easy to convert to CNG/LNG. 

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,842
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    CaptainDad
    Newest Member
    CaptainDad
    Joined

  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 484 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • asilverblazer
      Slate Electric Truck

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • newdude
      Help purchasing a touch screen digitizer

      By newdude · Posted

      I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • asilverblazer
      give me some tips to make my truck look better

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • fondupot
      Exhaust heat while towing!

      By fondupot · Posted

      You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...