Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I guess some of the 4x4 truck do not offer 4low. I know many people don't use it ever or use it incorrectly, but wow!  Anyone have details?

All Z71 have 4-low

RST doesn't offer 4-low.

 

Posted

RST.. and any configuration for that matter that has  Z71 will have duel speed transfer case with 4L.   I have one on order now. 

80% of the people that have 4x4 will never use. And when they do.. they will use 4H ..or "auto" most of the time. 

I have a Sierra 4x4 and Silverado 4x4 and I'm in the woods every single week... and even I rarely ever need or choose 4L

  • Like 1
Posted

This has been discussed a fair bit in other threads, but I'll briefly summarize my thoughts here.

 

In snowy areas of the world, almost everyone uses 4x4 once in a while.  4h serves fine for this.

 

The reasons I see for a two speed transfer case are:

1.  Off road.  Mostly for the type of rough trails that a stock truck would struggle on anyway.  Most drivers don't do any tough trails.
2.  Backing up or parking a trailer.  The extra torque is very handy if the transmission has a taller-than-first-gear reverse gear.  Slopes or bumps can require a fair bit of torque to creep a heavy trailer over.  The added control of 4L is great.

3.  Pulling a boat out of the water.  Some ramps are steep and slippery.  The extra torque and control is great.

 

I could be wrong, but it almost seems to me like the 2-speed should be tied to max tow packages, in addition to the off road packages.

Posted

I appreciate the extra torque when going off road in the winter to our camp.  Sometimes 4H doesn't allow enough wheel spin in snow and slush and 4L shuts off all of the nanny controls.  

Posted

4L is definitely pretty handy when you have it.  I wouldn't want to get a 4x4 truck without it.  I wouldn't say I use it as much for traction purposes but more for getting a better gear when moving something.  

  • Like 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, GMC-AT said:

RST.. and any configuration for that matter that has  Z71 will have duel speed transfer case with 4L.   I have one on order now. 

80% of the people that have 4x4 will never use. And when they do.. they will use 4H ..or "auto" most of the time. 

I have a Sierra 4x4 and Silverado 4x4 and I'm in the woods every single week... and even I rarely ever need or choose 4L

Yup, Just to have something that adds complexity, cost and future problems for something your not going to use?  There are going to be a few no doubt....I agree hardly ever use it?

  • Confused 1
Posted

The single speed t-case has an extra button on the shift control that uses the ABS/Stabilitrak to mimic 4LO in situations where it might arise. 

 

If the 2 speed case is on anyone's requirement list, its included with Z71, which is available on WT, LT, RST, LTZ and High Country, and standard on Custom TB and LT TB.  The only trim that you can't get Z71 on is the Custom trim. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, newdude said:

The single speed t-case has an extra button on the shift control that uses the ABS/Stabilitrak to mimic 4LO in situations where it might arise. 

 

If the 2 speed case is on anyone's requirement list, its included with Z71, which is available on WT, LT, RST, LTZ and High Country, and standard on Custom TB and LT TB.  The only trim that you can't get Z71 on is the Custom trim. 

 

I'd be interested to hear more about that 4lo mimic button.  Any video reviews yet?

Posted

I've used many boat ramps in my life and only a few times have I needed 4wd, never 4wd low.  Most of the people who talk to me about 4wd low tell me how they can't get it out of 4wd low once in 4wd low. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, SILVER SLED said:

I've used many boat ramps in my life and only a few times have I needed 4wd, never 4wd low.  Most of the people who talk to me about 4wd low tell me how they can't get it out of 4wd low once in 4wd low. 

Same here.  I use 4L every time I put the boat in or out of the water.

Posted
42 minutes ago, Darmichar said:

Same here.  I use 4L every time I put the boat in or out of the water.

He said he never uses 4 low, only 4 hi.  

 

I'm in the same group. It was necessary with the 4 speeds but you shouldn't need 4 low to pull a boat out with a new 8 or 10 speed (around 4.6 1st gear, 4 speed was 3.06)

 

I'd take 4 low, but I don't really care 1 way or another.  

 

The single speed has a mode that has some cool off-road features like a crawl mode and a mode that makes it so the truck won't move unless your foot is on the gas (won't roll if idleing or when you take your foot off the gas or brake)

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SILVER SLED said:

I've used many boat ramps in my life and only a few times have I needed 4wd, never 4wd low.  Most of the people who talk to me about 4wd low tell me how they can't get it out of 4wd low once in 4wd low. 

Depends on the boat ramp.

Several around here in the KC area are STEEP and slimy.

4 Low is added insurance if you ask me. Kind of like the afterburner on a Jet Engine.

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Sierra Dan said:

Depends on the boat ramp.

Several around here in the KC area are STEEP and slimy.

4 Low is added insurance if you ask me. Kind of like the afterburner on a Jet Engine.

Perhaps I'm missing something. If you're in 4 hi on a single speed transfer case and can spin the tires (you said slimy) you would have a gaurenteed 3 tire spin due to the rear locker.  What would 4 low do for you?  The single speed offers a mode that would make it so the brakes would stop you from rolling backwards when you are not touching the brake or gas too. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, shift_grind said:

Perhaps I'm missing something. If you're in 4 hi on a single speed transfer case and can spin the tires (you said slimy) you would have a gaurenteed 3 tire spin due to the rear locker.  What would 4 low do for you?  The single speed offers a mode that would make it so the brakes would stop you from rolling backwards when you are not touching the brake or gas too. 

I guess you are not missing anything but expressing your facts and opinions about what you know, which is what I have done.

The post I quoted from Silver Sled mentioned never needing 4wd Low for boat ramp use.

Like my response stated..... it would depend on the boat ramp. I have neighbors, friends and relatives who do use 4 Low around here on boat ramps.

I have also used 4 Low with my sierra on a boat ramp to launch and recover my next door neighbors 23' Tige' ski boat.

4 Low is a grunt/gearing aid in this case. Just like running 4 Hi or 4 Low in Mud. You need 4 Hi in mud for wheel speed. 4 Low will bog you down as you do not get the proper momentum.

 

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Sierra Dan said:

I guess you are not missing anything but expressing your facts and opinions about what you know, which is what I have done.

The post I quoted from Silver Sled mentioned never needing 4wd Low for boat ramp use.

Like my response stated..... it would depend on the boat ramp. I have neighbors, friends and relatives who do use 4 Low around here on boat ramps.

I have also used 4 Low with my sierra on a boat ramp to launch and recover my next door neighbors 23' Tige' ski boat.

4 Low is a grunt/gearing aid in this case. Just like running 4 Hi or 4 Low in Mud. You need 4 Hi in mud for wheel speed. 4 Low will bog you down as you do not get the proper momentum.

 

My owners manual for my Sierra says you can use 4L up to 45 mph!  Wow.  The only time I tried 4L for more than 10 mph was on sand dunes in my Canyon, and I quickly concluded 4H was better suited.

Edited by rkj__

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...