Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, hiranger said:

I had purchased mine in March and only been driving to work (4.5 miles each way) so I didn't ever see, November 11th we went to the In-laws and it was raining, My 10 year old says I'm getting wet, It was scheduled for its first oil change on the 26th, said they would need to keep it for about a week, I told them I would need a loaner can't be without wheels for a week, so I had to wait almost 1 month, they call, I drop mine off and pick up a 2019 Z71, last night we are coming back again from my in-laws, we stop to get gas and my 4 year old daughter Mon! this truck leaks in the same place as daddy's truck!

mine.jpg

My Silverado

loaner.jpg

Their Loaner Z71

Lol, wow. This is really going to turn into a huge issue for GM. 
 

Got mine in March 2019, too. It was a Feb 2019 build. Started leaking after 8 months, 7000 miles... which seems like a lot of people’s stories right now. With winter and spring upon us, the dealerships are going to start seeing a LOT more of these. 

Posted

With as big as this thread is, are there any trucks out there with significant time and mileage that do NOT leak? If so, I wonder what the difference could be between those that leak and those that don’t.

Posted
32 minutes ago, bamorris2 said:

With as big as this thread is, are there any trucks out there with significant time and mileage that do NOT leak? If so, I wonder what the difference could be between those that leak and those that don’t.

I used to think this was an issue isolated to specific build dates. But in the past few weeks a lot of us 2019 builds and even some 2020 builds are saying they are leaking. So methinks this issue is much worse than people think. 
 

I will safely speculate to say that nearly every T1 will have a leak at some point. 

Posted
1 hour ago, econometrics said:

Lol, wow. This is really going to turn into a huge issue for GM. 
 

Got mine in March 2019, too. It was a Feb 2019 build. Started leaking after 8 months, 7000 miles... which seems like a lot of people’s stories right now. With winter and spring upon us, the dealerships are going to start seeing a LOT more of these. 

 

2 hours ago, SamDSJR said:

So we got our first rain since my "fix" and sure enough she's leaking. In for the second repair she shall go tomorrow.

 

Posted

This is crazy, because lastnight it wasn't even raining hard when my daughter noticed the loaner was leaking too. Monday I'm calling Chevrolet and asking them to replace the rear window, I was reading that's the only real fix.

Posted
1 hour ago, ryan030389 said:

This thread has me nervous. February 2019 build. I purchased it new in September. No leaks so far. 4400 miles now


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Mine was a Feb 2019 build and it started leaking around 7000 miles. 

Posted
1 hour ago, hiranger said:

This is crazy, because lastnight it wasn't even raining hard when my daughter noticed the loaner was leaking too. Monday I'm calling Chevrolet and asking them to replace the rear window, I was reading that's the only real fix.

Good luck. It’s not really the only real fix, as there can still be some seals on the spoiler that leak. But it’s the next step if they already resealed your window. 

Posted

Been raining the last two days on and off and no re-leaks yet. But man, I'm checking almost every day. This isn't mentally healthy. Didn't start leaking until 12k miles. Nov '18 build, bought in March '19. No leaks until December '19. I would bet and agree with @econometrics that this issue affects all Silverados. There are only two types of Silverados, ones that have leaked and ones that will. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

I probably had less then a 1000 miles on my 2019 when I first smelled a bad odor. I thought for sure the carpet had gotten wet but I could find no evidence. This happened several times over the next couple of months until I finally discovered wet carpet just inside the drivers side passenger door. I started researching and found this forum and that;s when I realized it was coming from the rear window. My window is leaking on left and right side. There was water in the sliding window track and the plastic trim around the window is cracked. Going to the dealership a week from Tuesday. i wanted to get the holidays behind us so maybe the technicians will have a little focus. I'm going to stress a new window be installed because of the large crack in the plastic trim around the sliding glass. No amount of new sealant is going to fix that issue. So we shall see what happens.

Posted
32 minutes ago, UGADawgs said:

Been raining the last two days on and off and no re-leaks yet. But man, I'm checking almost every day. This isn't mentally healthy. Didn't start leaking until 12k miles. Nov '18 build, bought in March '19. No leaks until December '19. I would bet and agree with @econometrics that this issue affects all Silverados. There are only two types of Silverados, ones that have leaked and ones that will. 

I don't think the solid rear window is included in the leaking.  I posted in another forum. It seems like it's not IF it's going to leak but, WHEN.

  • Like 1
Posted
Mine was a Feb 2019 build and it started leaking around 7000 miles. 


I was dreading it before but now I’m really worried about it because I just had my interior redone with katzkins leather the last thing I was is some greasy tech getting hand prints all over the inside of my truck. Not to mention the horrible sealant and scratch job that comes along with the exterior part of the repair


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
1 hour ago, 2016 Sierra Owner said:

I don't think the solid rear window is included in the leaking.  I posted in another forum. It seems like it's not IF it's going to leak but, WHEN.

Right, I think the solid rear windows are fairing better. I guess I haven’t heard if anyone here with a leak has the solid window? I assume we all have the sliding rear. 
 

But, seeing how the spoiler is attached to the cab, and the poor engineering for water flow there, I could see how the solid rear windows could leak at some point, too. 
 

Main issue here seems to be that the sealant doesn’t keep the seal after some time goes by with the truck flexing and freezing / cooling, etc. Both sealant on the sliding window frame, but also around the spoiler bolt locations. 

Posted

I think part of the issue is the slider window has a piece of plastic for the window slider in-between the glass and gasket. The solid window is just glass and gasket but I would have to double check on my loaner. It's just a bad design all around. All to add a stupid spoiler that doesn't even look that good.

Sent from my Pixel 4 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...