Jump to content

BEST MODEL EVER BUILT


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, aseibel said:

looks wise, aren't we all in love with what we saw when we were kids?

For me its square body or GMT400. Nothing built in the last 20 years has looked as good to me.

 

technology keeps improving, some bugs will always be found. I have never been into the new flashy features, so there's not much draw to the brand new vehicles. Wait till the 5th service bulletin/ recall just like the 14-15's had.

I used to think the gmt800s, but a clean 400 with the right paint scheme, oh man those are nice. 

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

The last new truck for me was a 14 Texas Edition GMC. I have to give it credit for quite cab, fuel economy, and power. For the winner as far as longevity and near perfection my 04 GMC Z71, with my 01 near tided. The 14 could easily have won it weren’t for cylinder deactivation and weak drive shaft.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I can't judge my 2017 yet... at 27k miles it's been flawless, but it's too early to tell. If it ends up as reliable and as problem free as my 2008 Tacoma was, I'll be happy.

At 185k, all I did was regular maintenance, tires, brakes, muffler and a $150 steering shaft. Pretty good for 10 years of ownership.

Posted

GMT800.  I crashed my 05 1500hd sierra a couple weeks ago... jumped an approach and it bent the frame in front of the cab a bit and wrecked the forward sheet metal.  It has over 200000 miles... getting pretty rotten.... but... I'm fixing it.  Didn't report the accident or claim insurance on it as it would have been just written off and I don't feel like fighting with them on buying it back and the salvage title.  It's going to cost me more than the truck is worth to fix... I don't care.  Will be on the road again in the early new year and hits the frame rack over Christmas while the body shop is technically closed. Its easily the best vehicle I have ever owned.. and will continue to be that.

 

I could let it go and just drive the 2017... buy another one... nope.  I might buy a 6.2 GMT900 to bag anyway but I am not letting that 05 go.  Not happening.  I prefer my 05 over my 17... or any of my other non gmt800 trucks I have or have had.  It's why the biggest dollar project I have done automotive wise approaching 6 figures in cost is.... another 2004 GMT800 like my 05 lol. 

Posted

My 96 GMC Z71 was a great truck

My 2000 GMC Z71 was good except for the 5.3 piston slap.... 

My 2009 Chevy Silverado Z71, the 5.3 had to be rebuilt at 40k... it drank 2 qts of oil every 700 miles. The rebuild was covered under warranty. 

My 2014 GMC AT 5.3 was a nice truck with the exception of all the tsb’s, recalls and seat issues. 

My 2016 GMC AT 6.2 has been a great truck, probably the best I have owned! No problems! 

Posted

The old carb'd GM's were the easiest to own, anyone can work on them. The Vortec trucks were also very reliable and somewhat mechanic friendly. The GMT800 HD's were great, but not so much the 1/2 tons and the 2007.5-2013 were the most reliable trucks Chevy ever made. The K2 is the best looking truck since the late 50's/ early 60's "Apache", but the worst in terms on long term quality. The T1? I would expect similar reliability as the K2, which is not great. 

Posted

I think each generation gets better.  I own a '81 C10 square, 2006 1500 GMT800, a couple of 1500 GMT900, and am looking forward to a T1XX.  Lots of improvements each generation.  Driveability on a daily driver is important to me.  

Posted

I think my 06 Silverado was the best vehicle I ever owned. I really like my 15 Sierra z71. The 5.3 in my 15 flat runs way better then my o6 5.3. I do think the 06 was built a lot beefier. Time will tell on my 15 so far it's been good no major issues at 41,000 miles. Now I will say my friend bought a 2019 loaded at4 with the 6.2 and DANM it's nice!!

Posted

My opinion is weird. 67-72 Chevy is the best looking truck ever made to me but my favorite truck is the 73-87 cause that’s what everyone had when I was little. I was born in ‘84 so they were already on their way out by the time I was old enough to know what I was looking at but people didn’t dump cars and trucks so fast back then so they were still around. Not a fan of the 400s at all though even though they were “childhood era” too. 

Posted

I've owned at least one truck from each of the last 4 generations of GMC 1500.  All things considered, the '14-'18 is definately the best all around vehicle imo.  The '19 is not for me, I firmly believe in time, the '19 will be viewed as a step backwards from an overall quality aspect (still a good truck, but not quite as good as its predecessor).

Posted
On 12/10/2018 at 4:21 PM, pronstar said:

Mechanic friends of mine seem to agree that the 99-07 models were built very well and are largely bulletproof.

But I’ve never owned one so no first-hand experience.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Lol as long as you didnt mind your 5.3 engine sounding like a box of rocks when started, piston slap was very prevalent on nearly every model made during the 99-03 years. I had an 05 and was a good truck but my 14 has seen the dealer less than the 05 did at this same point and time. My 95 s10 zr2 was at the dealer near every week, i think i spent 10 grand on ball joints and idler arms during my 9 years of owning it. 

Posted

Gee, let me think for a moment on how to word my response for a family-friendly audience:

 

Not only "No" but "HELL TO THE NO!"

 

The new generation looks like it was designed by separate committees, comprised of blind idiots who phoned it in and left early), none of which were allowed to work together on anything.

:puke:

 

GM spends all of its efforts saying "Hey, look at this shiny new feature over here!' (that most people don't care about, like a complex new 12-way folding tailgate in response to Ford's simple step) to try to keep us from focusing on the fact that they never have fixed all of the problems from the past (like the 8 speed transmissions and AFM problems) [hey, let's rename AFM and make it much more complex . . . dealers can't fix the last generation, but it'll take buyers 2-3 years to find out the all-new system has the same old problems], all the while hoping that we don't notice the decontenting of items on all but the lowest-priced models (which themselves are now $45-50K+ now!).  Not to mention their interiors are by far the worst in the industry.  Overheard at the dealer:  "Uhhh, you don't like the inside, have you looked at the front?  Uhhh, you don't like the front, have you looked at the rear?  Uhhh, you don't like the rear, did you notice we rounded off one corner of the wheel wells? Uhhh, you think that looks silly, did you notice that we moved the mirrors down the doors and took the low range out of your 4x4 transfer case, and that the new models get worse fuel mileage than last year?"

:loser:

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, MaverickZ71 said:

Gee, let me think for a moment on how to word my response for a family-friendly audience:

 

Not only "No" but "HELL TO THE NO!"

 

The new generation looks like it was designed by separate committees, comprised of blind idiots who phoned it in and left early), none of which were allowed to work together on anything.

:puke:

 

GM spends all of its efforts saying "Hey, look at this shiny new feature over here!' (that most people don't care about, like a complex new 12-way folding tailgate in response to Ford's simple step) to try to keep us from focusing on the fact that they never have fixed all of the problems from the past (like the 8 speed transmissions and AFM problems) [hey, let's rename AFM and make it much more complex . . . dealers can't fix the last generation, but it'll take buyers 2-3 years to find out the all-new system has the same old problems], all the while hoping that we don't notice the decontenting of items on all but the lowest-priced models (which themselves are now $45-50K+ now!).  Not to mention their interiors are by far the worst in the industry.  Overheard at the dealer:  "Uhhh, you don't like the inside, have you looked at the front?  Uhhh, you don't like the front, have you looked at the rear?  Uhhh, you don't like the rear, did you notice we rounded off one corner of the wheel wells? Uhhh, you think that looks silly, did you notice that we moved the mirrors down the doors and took the low range out of your 4x4 transfer case, and that the new models get worse fuel mileage than last year?"

:loser:

 

 

 

 

Sooo....you're saying you can't wait to buy one of the '19 truck?  lol

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 571 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks; I looked there a few minutes, and I think I can find something. I really never looked there, as I thought it was stuff like PTO/aftermarket bodies/accessories like snow plows.
    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...