Jump to content

2017 Silverado Help


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello guys. I know this has been asked a million and one times but I seem to be getting no where and the threads seem to turn into more arguing and debating then facts and resolutions. Please be nice as I have knowledge of mechanics but not modifications. I currently have a 2017 Silverado 1500 z71 with a 2.5 rough country lift level kit(RC is garbage I know). I’m looking to lift it 4” this summer. I will be doing it myself with my father in law as he is a master mechanic and I know my way around a truck. I would like to run 33’s with 20 inch rims. In your opinion is a 4” rancho or a 4” BDS the best route to go? I am avoiding RC for the angles and I want quality (you get what you pay for) and I do not want to have issues down the road if I can prevent them now with the extra $ although I am not a millionaire. So my questions are any experience with 4” BDS OR 4” Rancho and which is better and any issues? Any advice on a 4” lift with 33” tires and 20 inch rims?(how will it look?) Thank you all for your help as this is my first truck I am modifying ??

 

-(silver rims were dealership)

-(black rims are after 2.5 level on it)

FA7E43FC-46AB-4450-8482-8D7A094D26D3.jpeg

409538BC-736E-4169-B6DF-B24FF22C07CB.png

Posted
Hello guys. I know this has been asked a million and one times but I seem to be getting no where and the threads seem to turn into more arguing and debating then facts and resolutions. Please be nice as I have knowledge of mechanics but not modifications. I currently have a 2017 Silverado 1500 z71 with a 2.5 rough country lift level kit(RC is garbage I know). I’m looking to lift it 4” this summer. I will be doing it myself with my father in law as he is a master mechanic and I know my way around a truck. I would like to run 33’s with 20 inch rims. In your opinion is a 4” rancho or a 4” BDS the best route to go? I am avoiding RC for the angles and I want quality (you get what you pay for) and I do not want to have issues down the road if I can prevent them now with the extra $ although I am not a millionaire. So my questions are any experience with 4” BDS OR 4” Rancho and which is better and any issues? Any advice on a 4” lift with 33” tires and 20 inch rims?(how will it look?) Thank you all for your help as this is my first truck I am modifying [emoji1417]
 
-(silver rims were dealership)
-(black rims are after 2.5 level on it)
FA7E43FC-46AB-4450-8482-8D7A094D26D3.thumb.jpeg.7c270b19cacab2e1277f9c192917ab3a.jpeg
409538BC-736E-4169-B6DF-B24FF22C07CB.thumb.png.db852bffc5b47905ffde9bf8ca6f6cae.png


I’ve got no experience with Rancho kits but I have a 6” BDS coilover conversion kit and I could not be happier with the quality of this product. The engineering behind the knuckle, sway bar drop, etc is phenomenal. The angles are amazing and the truck rides better than stock (although the coil overs have most todo with this). You won’t be disappointed in a BDS suspension system, they are top of the line products. a056c1fa0127d59f25f97e20c3b4bed0.jpg
55ed95766d946594e654274b437a620c.jpg
f9657593e65e33cff51ace433aa54546.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

20180518_200124.jpg.4adedea67c6336a38cc86363236f9cbe.jpgI have no experience with the Rancho kit, but I have the 4" BDS with 35's on 20x9 wheels. It is slightly, and I do mean slightly, stiffer than stock. I'm very impressed by the ride and handling from this kit. This is my first lifted truck, and if I were to do it again, I would go back to BDS without hesitation.

Posted

It will look great. Here is my truck with 4" Fabtech and 33x12.50R20 30b7736d74d4af3a3b0f04232ae7826c.jpg16b19c49f5ccd956a0f6c401074b68f2.jpg

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Posted
6 hours ago, Leftridgec4 said:

I currently have a 2017 Silverado 1500 z71 with a 2.5 rough country lift level kit(RC is garbage I know).  I am avoiding RC for the angles and I want quality (you get what you pay for)

 

 

How is it garbage?  Is it because someone told you it was?  For every one person that's had an issue you'll find 5 that haven't.  I bet you have no issues whatsoever with your RC level.  Its American made yet you say it isn't good quality?

 

Your post is confusing

Posted

I have the 4” lift by RC
If you get the shackles you’ll maintain pretty good angles
I currently run 22x14 on a 33 MT tire and am very impressed with how it rides


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
    • Coming back to this question, *my* answer is no, it's not something about which I'm knowledgeable. I'd need to read up on it and understand how it applies to we the consumer and our oil change regimens.   One of your bolded points is that fresh oil in a container contains particulate matter. I don't think I'm surprised, maybe a little bit that it seems to be a major factor, but there's manufacturing process involved in oil and it doesn't exactly come in sterile packaging.    How much is filtered out on the first start by an acceptable quality filter (AC Delco, as a baseline) filter?   On the GM OLM discussion, just saying that the "number of engine revolutions" appears to be a factor in oil life... cough... maybe driving style *does* matter.    
    • GMC has been revising their trim level names over the past several years. Sierra Pro has taken over the Work Truck/SL trim name; Elevation has replaced the SLE (and with the Premium upgrade, SLT) in the SUV lineup of late; AT4/AT4 Ultimate and Denali/Denali Ultimate have been the top of the line in off road luxury and on-road luxury respectively for the full-size pickups and SUVs.    SL, SLE, SLT nomenclatures are gone in the Sierra truck line. Mark my words.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...