Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

From what I understand, the same sensors are used in the Cadillac CT6. The brake pads have a wire in the pad, and current flows through the wire. The vehicle measures resistance. As the pads, and thereby the wire, wears down, the resistance increases as it is the same amount of current flowing through a smaller diameter wire. This, as well as many other factors im sure, are calculated into the estimate for pad life remaining.

 

I have a theory with the eboost system that provides brake assistance, what if that system is wrong, and is providing more brake assist than neccessary thereby wearing the pads out sooner.... 

 

Simplest test, check actual pad thickness. Compare that to the reported pad life, if true - suspect eboost software applying too much pressure. If pad life greater than reported, suspect software giving false readings...

Posted

Hope this helps everyone.  Just checked mine now when I rotated my tires.  18k miles and my fronts say 41% left for the brake pads.  Not true at all.  They are almost brand new, front and back.  I wouldn't worry at all about what the sensors say.

 

 

20190531_185817.jpg

Posted

My dealer did multiple updates at my first oil change.  They did ECM, TCM, BCM and another brake related one to address the rapid decline with the brake wear indicator.  Also got a radio update while there too plus first oil change.  All at no cost to me!  My brake wear indicator now shows 100% front and rears.  Hopefully this issue is fixed for me. 

  • Like 1
Posted
My dealer did multiple updates at my first oil change.  They did ECM, TCM, BCM and another brake related one to address the rapid decline with the brake wear indicator.  Also got a radio update while there too plus first oil change.  All at no cost to me!  My brake wear indicator now shows 100% front and rears.  Hopefully this issue is fixed for me. 
Would you mind sharing your work order from dealer that lists what update they did? I'm going in Monday and want to mention it.

Are you sure they didn't just reset it 100 manually and tell you it's fixed?

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Posted

Well, no.  I'm hoping they did all of what I mentioned.  For sure, time will tell!!

Posted

Had some other things to do at the dealer so I mentioned this since I was showing 80% life at 2K miles. They inspected the pads and found them at slightly less than 100%. They reset the indicator and sent me on my way. As such, I removed the brake wear indicator from the displayed items and am blissfully unaware of its reading.

Posted

Here’s mine. 70% highway driving. At dealership now for oil change, etc. will update when finished.

4BCA3E33-C969-4525-8BA0-53D5C2DAE56E.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 6/6/2019 at 9:05 AM, ddevos said:

From what I understand, the same sensors are used in the Cadillac CT6. The brake pads have a wire in the pad, and current flows through the wire. The vehicle measures resistance. As the pads, and thereby the wire, wears down, the resistance increases as it is the same amount of current flowing through a smaller diameter wire. This, as well as many other factors im sure, are calculated into the estimate for pad life remaining.

 

I need this overcomplicated feature in my pickup truck like I need a horn growing out of my head.  What happens when you need to replace the pads, are they now like quadruple the price to get that silly wire?

 

Would rather they have left this alone, and not tried to save a few dollars by removing the glasses compartment from the overhead, and the adjustable seatbelt shoulder mount, both of which have been standard on every new car I've bought since the mid-90s.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Schmoe said:

Here’s mine. 70% highway driving. At dealership now for oil change, etc. will update when finished.

4BCA3E33-C969-4525-8BA0-53D5C2DAE56E.jpeg

Any update?

Posted
23 minutes ago, ddevos said:

Any update?

“Brake pad life shows minimal wear. But I’ll contact you in a week and a half so that we can try to give you a loaner to investigate the problem. We will need your truck for a few days”. ?

Posted
13 minutes ago, Schmoe said:

“Brake pad life shows minimal wear. But I’ll contact you in a week and a half so that we can try to give you a loaner to investigate the problem. We will need your truck for a few days”. ?

Go figure. 

Posted

Mines also showing lower than would be expected. I did have pads changed on left rear for another warranty related issue 4-5 K ago.

IMG_0192.jpg

Posted

i believe he said hes gone thru 20%....which seems reasonable for 13000 miles. im in the same ballpark with 10000 miles. without factoring in driving habits and paths traveled it seems normal. I have larger wheels, heavier tires, i tow occasionally. I look at the information as a helpful guideline rather than something i worry about. brake pads like tires are going to need to be changed eventually. beats the old days with my nissan armada when i was having pads and rotors changed every 15,000 miles cause nissan didnt put adequate size brakes for the size of the truck.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I've had the same issue, and was told that on June 28th, GM released a document to dealers titled "PIT5695 Brake Pad Life % Calculates Down too Quickly". Seems we all of us having this issue are not crazy or driving our trucks wrong:-) I found with the dealer for 3 days on this one, and they released this on the day I went to pick up my truck from the service dept. Still no update, but they GM is aware of this and apparently has a software fix. They told me that the update would need to be performed at the dealer...

https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2019/MC-10162168-9999.pdf

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Good because at this rate I will be at 0% around 8K miles [emoji23]


Ryan B.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...