Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, tanner709 said:

AUTOMATIC 4 HI
If road conditions frequently alternate between high- and low-traction areas, consider using the “AUTO” setting found on select GMC electronic transfer cases. This setting allows your GMC to automatically distribute torque to the front axle by anticipating the need for additional traction.  Shifting into “auto” engages the front axle, but the transfer case sends power primarily to the rear wheels in normal conditions and the clutches modulate torque forward to provide stability and enhance traction to the vehicle.  Although not always optimal for efficiency and wear of your vehicle 4wd driveline, AUTOMATIC 4 HI can be used on any road condition without risk of damaging your vehicle.


This is also dependent on your driving.  I teach EVOC training and we've destroyed some systems on dry pavement if people leave them in 4-Auto, because you can cause the system to kick in on dry pavement.  You probably shouldn't be driving that way on the street, but just a thought.

Posted
4 minutes ago, SqueakyBoot said:

This is also dependent on your driving.  I teach EVOC training and we've destroyed some systems on dry pavement if people leave them in 4-Auto, because you can cause the system to kick in on dry pavement.  You probably shouldn't be driving that way on the street, but just a thought.

I agree, and dry pavement in the summer vs the winter is two very different things. So are the winters we all experience. Turning this off or at least being cautious of it on any dry, high traction, surfaces is critical.

 

A more common scenario than damage to trucks, you'll see this in the ATV community alot. Where 90% of riders stay in awd/4wd when entering back on the pavement or hard pack - or the cases of plowing, slipping and suddenly hooking in.snap goes a front d/s or the front diff.

Posted
On 7/15/2019 at 3:37 PM, z71 man said:

Got a call from my dealership last week and they say they have a fix, GM has ordered the parts and they will let me know when to bring my truck in. Don't know what  parts were ordered, but when I find out I will let you know.  Hope it works this time

Mine has been making the noise as well and today I had my HC in for its first oil change and mentioned the problem to my service writer. I also gave him a copy of the PIP that was posted here. They were unable to find anything about the fix in their system.

 

Please keep us posted on yours, and if possible any TSB, or other bulletin that would apply to the fix for it. Thanks!

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/15/2019 at 5:37 PM, z71 man said:

Got a call from my dealership last week and they say they have a fix, GM has ordered the parts and they will let me know when to bring my truck in. Don't know what  parts were ordered, but when I find out I will let you know.  Hope it works this time

Any word yet? Can’t wait to get mine fixed. I’m sick of listening to jingle bells lol. 

Posted
On 7/7/2019 at 12:15 AM, Tischmic said:

My 2019 Rst is doing the same thing. Goes into the dealer Wednesday. 

any news about this?  What did the dealer say?

Posted
17 hours ago, Tischmic said:

Any word yet? Can’t wait to get mine fixed. I’m sick of listening to jingle bells lol. 

I'm interested in the solution too

Posted
27 minutes ago, dho238 said:

QS any news about this?  What did the dealer say?

They heard it and admitted it was very odd. They looked into it and told me about the #pip5653 (which I told them about) and said they spoke with the Gm tech line and said they are aware of it and they do not have a fix currently but expect one soon. I asked how soon, and they said, they expect within a few weeks. I also told them about my brake wear life indicators going down very quick, (50% in front with 5k miles) lol...which they also told me Gm is aware of and they said Gm HAS a software update for that but it hasn’t been released to dealers yet. This was over a week ago now. 

Posted

What a joke. My truck has the same annoying noise. GM should be ashamed of themselves. I remember test driving the truck and it was always in automatic 4 wheel drive. Now I know why. 

Posted

The dealership called me around July 10th about a fix on this issue.  They have not called me back yet, hopefully next week they will, or I will call them.   I will let everyone know as soon as I find out how they are going to fix this jingle

Posted
On 7/19/2019 at 4:34 PM, Tischmic said:

They heard it and admitted it was very odd. They looked into it and told me about the #pip5653 (which I told them about) and said they spoke with the Gm tech line and said they are aware of it and they do not have a fix currently but expect one soon. I asked how soon, and they said, they expect within a few weeks. I also told them about my brake wear life indicators going down very quick, (50% in front with 5k miles) lol...which they also told me Gm is aware of and they said Gm HAS a software update for that but it hasn’t been released to dealers yet. This was over a week ago now. 

My dealership told me the same thing, GM does not have a fix as of now

Posted

I feel like everyone is giving up on this issue. Does anyone have any updates for a fix?

Posted
1 hour ago, Aycock1987 said:

I feel like everyone is giving up on this issue. Does anyone have any updates for a fix?

 

I spoke with my dealership last week, they said there isn't a fix yet. I have my first oil change tomorrow so I will try to ask a little more about it.

Posted
2 hours ago, The Tos said:

 

I spoke with my dealership last week, they said there isn't a fix yet. I have my first oil change tomorrow so I will try to ask a little more about it.

Ask them if they know if they are still working on one. Or if they can find out

Posted
6 hours ago, Aycock1987 said:

I feel like everyone is giving up on this issue. Does anyone have any updates for a fix?

Gm better not be giving up, or else they can buy my truck back and give me one that doesn’t sound like the Salvation Army bell ringers. I haven’t called Gm yet but I’m thinking I may have to.

Posted
14 hours ago, Tischmic said:

Gm better not be giving up, or else they can buy my truck back and give me one that doesn’t sound like the Salvation Army bell ringers. I haven’t called Gm yet but I’m thinking I may have to.

Always call and start a case. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,046 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...