Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, Rmiles2314 said:

Hi all, quick question on this.  I have the 5.3 with single exhaust, I haven't seen any posts or pics with just the single.  Does this make a difference?  I know my sound is good when I first start it but of course quiets down after a few seconds.  Also, I see the clamps and sheet metal on the 3 screens (for those that did the clamps/sheet metal), do you also have to do the valve as well (sorry probably a dumb question) if you're only doing the exhaust tape?  Thanks, I can't wait to try it on mine!!

Not sure what the exhaust on the single pipe set up looks like - if it has resonator screens or not. Crawl under yours and take a look. Probably just has the three screens on the one tail pipe? 

 

Clamping open the flapper valve is where you get most of the noise improvement from this mod / hack. I would advise you to cover the screens, too. You'll get the best improvement in sound. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, econometrics said:

Not sure what the exhaust on the single pipe set up looks like - if it has resonator screens or not. Crawl under yours and take a look. Probably just has the three screens on the one tail pipe? 

 

Clamping open the flapper valve is where you get most of the noise improvement from this mod / hack. I would advise you to cover the screens, too. You'll get the best improvement in sound. 

Thank you!  Yeah, it has just the one pipe and 3 screens.  The flapper valve is just up a ways on the pipe, correct?  I have the Cherry Red Texas Edition and am saddened to have not got dual exhaust.  I love that look but will have to eventually do duals later on, hoping this will be a good and easy experiment!

Posted
6 minutes ago, Rmiles2314 said:

Thank you!  Yeah, it has just the one pipe and 3 screens.  The flapper valve is just up a ways on the pipe, correct?  I have the Cherry Red Texas Edition and am saddened to have not got dual exhaust.  I love that look but will have to eventually do duals later on, hoping this will be a good and easy experiment!

On the trucks with dual exhaust, the flapper is just before the muffler intake. 

 

Look at pictures posted previously in this thread, and you should see it. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, econometrics said:

On the trucks with dual exhaust, the flapper is just before the muffler intake. 

 

Look at pictures posted previously in this thread, and you should see it. 

Thank you, I'll let you know!

Posted

so i love tinkering with my truck...couldnt help trying this out. used the hvac tape...did the whole thing in the dark with a flashlight in 10 minutes. my honest review is that it def makes noticeable difference, and while its a great idea, cant beat the result for spending 10-20 bucks. It does not compare to a true exhaust upgrade.  I did an exhaust on my 2015...infact the old valve mod on that one is what sparked the bug lol. in closing this is a great mod. its low cost, actually works and gets people to get working on their truck and get a little dirty. 

  • Like 3
Posted
11 hours ago, mfbearded said:

so i love tinkering with my truck...couldnt help trying this out. used the hvac tape...did the whole thing in the dark with a flashlight in 10 minutes. my honest review is that it def makes noticeable difference, and while its a great idea, cant beat the result for spending 10-20 bucks. It does not compare to a true exhaust upgrade.  I did an exhaust on my 2015...infact the old valve mod on that one is what sparked the bug lol. in closing this is a great mod. its low cost, actually works and gets people to get working on their truck and get a little dirty. 

Did you also do the flapper valve?  There were a few different ways I saw on here, just curious how you handled yours in such a little amount of time!

Posted
On 9/25/2019 at 9:12 AM, Rmiles2314 said:

Did you also do the flapper valve?  There were a few different ways I saw on here, just curious how you handled yours in such a little amount of time!

yes i also did the flapper. used a piece of exhaust pipe strap (approx. 3'' long'') and hose clamp as someone else did above. used the hvac tape as well. as i stated i changed my own exhaust myself on my 2015 so i was knew my way around the truck and where things are. the valve is right before the muffler and the screens are right near the rear tires. 

Posted
9 hours ago, mfbearded said:

yes i also did the flapper. used a piece of exhaust pipe strap (approx. 3'' long'') and hose clamp as someone else did above. used the hvac tape as well. as i stated i changed my own exhaust myself on my 2015 so i was knew my way around the truck and where things are. the valve is right before the muffler and the screens are right near the rear tires. 

Thank you, hope to do it soon, will update once completed!

Posted

Just a note...I was under my truck the other day and see that all but one section of my HVAC tape has came off.  I imagine if I would have wrapped all the way around the pipe, it wouldn't have came off as easily.

Posted
On ‎9‎/‎24‎/‎2019 at 5:28 PM, econometrics said:

 

Clamping open the flapper valve is where you get most of the noise improvement from this mod / hack. I would advise you to cover the screens, too. You'll get the best improvement in sound.

I plan on doing this mod this weekend.  I admittedly haven't been under the truck yet to review, but am confused at how to clamp open the flapper valve.  Covering the screens makes total sense; I am just looking for more clarification on how the flapper works to best clamp it open.

 

Thanks!

Posted (edited)

FYI for 6.2 owners:

 

clamped open both my flappers valves and noticed zero difference in sound. Seems to do nothing on the 6.2 

Edited by brendon444
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 10/25/2019 at 10:54 AM, Zrouge1 said:

Has anyone just covered the resonators and left the flapper alone?

You won’t get much sound change doing this. 

Posted
7 hours ago, econometrics said:

You won’t get much sound change doing this. 

Thanks, you are correct a little change, mostly on a cold start.  What I did notice was when pulling our trailer and the RPMs got up around 3K plus it got a little obnoxious sounding to me.  That’s just the resonators covered, the flapper doing its thing.  

Posted
45 minutes ago, Zrouge1 said:

Thanks, you are correct a little change, mostly on a cold start.  What I did notice was when pulling our trailer and the RPMs got up around 3K plus it got a little obnoxious sounding to me.  That’s just the resonators covered, the flapper doing its thing.  

??
 

For me, the growl when the engine is under load or revved is just right. But I’m someone who was really considering a performance exhaust. So at the price it cost to do this hack, I’ve been loving it for what it is. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...