Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 3/30/2021 at 6:58 PM, Fubar12 said:

20210327_132136.jpg

What tire size are on those 22"? Any modifications to not rub?. I assume its leveled. Nice set up. Any more pics?

Posted
Just now, Angelo Pace Jr said:

BD8E3B51-D6E7-484E-AB99-E4EA4B8FF1D2.jpeg

2019 Trailboss Custom w/ Zone 6”- Belltechs  set at 7”- 37s on Stock rims( yea they fit and Don’t rub at all) Just ordered Cognito/Deaver Minipack springs for additional 1”-3” for rear To level out rear...

  • Like 2
Posted
On 4/4/2021 at 10:55 AM, kivetts04dmax said:

What size tires did you go with? leveling kit?

Lt285 50 22 33's

I do have a level kit however I have not installed it

Posted
On 4/6/2021 at 1:00 PM, lapoolboy said:

OEM 22's with 285/55R22 Ridge Grapplers.

PXL_20210406_195539797.jpg

PXL_20210406_195605936.jpg

how is the road noise vs stock tires?

Posted
2 hours ago, bluemonstercali said:

how is the road noise vs stock tires?

Honestly, I don't hear anything at all from the tires.  Of course, they are brand-new and I'm sure they will get louder as they wear, but I'm pleased so far.  This truck is pretty well insulated with the carpeted wheel liners and that helps some I'm sure.

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, Fubar12 said:

Lt285 50 22 33's

I do have a level kit however I have not installed it

Looks good! I’m leaning towards the toyos over the RGs. I’ve ran several Nittos and they aren’t bad but heard the toyos balance and wear better and they are a little lighter than the RGs.

Edited by kivetts04dmax
Posted
29 minutes ago, kivetts04dmax said:

Looks good! I’m leaning towards the toyos over the RGs. I’ve ran several Nittos and they aren’t bad but heard the toyos balance and wear better and they are a little lighter than the RGs.

Hope they aren't the Open Country R/T....I ran them on my 2017 and they were the loudest, most obnoxious tire I've ever ran...bar none.

Posted
1 hour ago, lapoolboy said:

Hope they aren't the Open Country R/T....I ran them on my 2017 and they were the loudest, most obnoxious tire I've ever ran...bar none.

I’ve been looking at the AT3s. I’ve been trying to see what the aggressive side looks like in the stock 275/60/20 size looks like, I wish they were a touch more aggressive on the sidewall

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Ahh, sorry about that - I got some bad info. Newdude is correct. That's what I get for working 13 hours straight ... on my "vacation", lol.   Should've checked the files I had instead of the internet.   Anyway ... this is GREAT news, since this would've been an absolute friggin nightmare to get working.   I'm telling you right now, your computer isn't bad. If it worked before the swap, it's working now. You need to do some more (better) diagnostics and figure out exactly what you're missing. Did you test every wire directly at the MAF? Have 5V reference? Ground? If you're reading ZERO g/s, your Hz isn't much use - it's going to be the wrong value anyway. The MAF is not working, and you need to find out WHY.   I got this off the net, so VERIFY first: Pin A: Black (BLK) wire, Circuit 552, serves as the Sensor Return (Ground).  Pin B: Tan (TAN) wire, Circuit 472, carries the Intake Air Temperature (IAT) signal.  Pin C: Yellow (YEL) wire, Circuit 492, is the primary MAF Sensor Signal output to the PCM. Pin D: Pink (PNK) wire, Circuit 339 or 539, provides Ignition 1 Voltage (Power).  Pin E: Tan/Black wire, Circuit 552 or similar, often associated with the Intake Air Temperature ground or signal return.  Global-A list: https://postimg.cc/KKJnQC85    
    • Correct....the end user can't reach to Realtruck directly like they can if they purchase a Bak, Undercover, etc...  It has to go through a dealer.
    • It is 4wd. shop told me it is the slip yoke. But not sure.
    • No, I did not tune out vvt. From what I read it should still be able to run without it, it'll just lose some torque/power.    I can see how that would make it not run correctly, but why would that cause the faulty MAF readings?   EDIT: I just ran a quick test and checked, and as I expected, the computer sees that the VVT cam phaser solenoid is not present, and throws a code for it, and does not try to change the cam angle at all. Commanded position just remains at zero, 100% of the time. This makes me think that the VVT is most likely not the cause of the problem though if anyone has a different/better explanation, I'm all ears.   UPDATE: I was able to find that my scan tool does indeed support reading the frequency (hz) off of the MAF (I thought it wasn't supported but turns out I just didn't know where to look for it). I noticed that regardless of engine state it always however this Is not what I observed with my multimeter. Like I said before, the MAF seems to put out a normal signal during cranking and then the signal drops to a very erratic reading once the engine is running. It seems from what my scan tool is telling me that the ECM is not recognizing this at all, and just reads 0 Hz 100% of the time. This pushes me towards the the PCM itself is faulty. I I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle, which I may try to connect and program (it's only ~50 bucks to get the software for a one-time programming)
    • Did you tune out the VVT?  07-09 they did not have VVT.  2010-2013 they did.      If you haven't tuned it, its trying to adjust cam timing.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...