Jump to content

Factory 5th wheel prep


Recommended Posts

Posted

Read on another forum that GM changed the pattern in the bed for the hitch?

Anyone know if this is true, and if it matches anything else?

  • Replies 143
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I know they moved to ball back two inches behind the axle. Just eyeballing the four puck holes the ball does look further to the rear in their pattern. That’s all I’ve heard they changed. I am counting on the pattern being the same as 2019.

Posted

I just got conformation from Curt, the pattern has changed for 2020. So our hitches or ISR adapters are now useless. :(

Posted
16 minutes ago, powerhaulic said:

I just got conformation from Curt, the pattern has changed for 2020. So our hitches or ISR adapters are now useless. :(

 

So the F-R and R-L dimensions between the puck locations has changed, as well as the centering of the grouping relative to the rear axle?

Posted
42 minutes ago, redwngr said:

 

So the F-R and R-L dimensions between the puck locations has changed, as well as the centering of the grouping relative to the rear axle?

What dimensions are unknown, only that they are different.

Posted

I will be following and hoping to learn more. I had picked out what I wanted for a hitch and need to be able to tow my fifth wheel soon after delivery. 

Posted
On 7/15/2019 at 4:26 PM, powerhaulic said:

I just got conformation from Curt, the pattern has changed for 2020. So our hitches or ISR adapters are now useless. :(

When you say you got a confirmation from Curt, you mean that you emailed them?

 

Curt is normally the 5th Wheel puck option on the Build and Price tool, but I don't even see an offering from them as an option. I might need to get a gooseball adapter like the B&W Companion or the Andersen Ultimate Hitch because I'm not replacing the inbox on my RV.

 

I'm surprised that no one else has picked up on this...

 

EDIT: I got in touch with with Andre at TFLTruck and they are going to research this topic and do a write up. I sent him a link to this thread.

Posted

Curt is still going to be supplying the accessory hitch, and has the ISR adapter in the works.

Posted

Does anyone have an idea about adapters for the puck systems?  Does a company make a universal one?  I have a B&W Patriot that is new.  I'd hate to have to buy another hitch.

Posted

As I stated above, Curt will be the first one to market with an ISR adapter for the 2020 HD.

 

I believe I will be among the first to have one. I am a dealer for RV and other powersports, and have contacted several manufacturers about the availability of hitch adapters.

 

 

Posted

my '20 hit the line today, I emailed Curt as well, they are in the process of design.  I asked if it would be available by Labor Day weekend and it was a maybe.  I'm SOL, if not, I have camping reservations and will have a lonely 5ht wheel sitting in the driveway without a hitch to pull it with.  I expect the truck here by 8/15, if I cannot get the hitch in time, it may sit on the back lot for 2 weeks. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Shawn T said:

my '20 hit the line today, I emailed Curt as well, they are in the process of design.  I asked if it would be available by Labor Day weekend and it was a maybe.  I'm SOL, if not, I have camping reservations and will have a lonely 5ht wheel sitting in the driveway without a hitch to pull it with.  I expect the truck here by 8/15, if I cannot get the hitch in time, it may sit on the back lot for 2 weeks. 

I know there are hitches that connect to the gooseneck ball.  I'm assuming you already have a hitch but there are options with the ball mount type.  

Posted
7 hours ago, JDT4719 said:

I know there are hitches that connect to the gooseneck ball.  I'm assuming you already have a hitch but there are options with the ball mount type.  

Not that easy, as GM changed the pattern of the other 4 pins. They are used to prevent rotation around the gooseneck ball when using an adapter.

Posted
57 minutes ago, powerhaulic said:

Not that easy, as GM changed the pattern of the other 4 pins. They are used to prevent rotation around the gooseneck ball when using an adapter.

The "pins" or "pucks" are for mounting a 5th wheel hitch. They have nothing to do with a goose ball adapter. Look at the Andersen Ultimate hitch, or the B&W Companion that uses the goose ball instead of the pucks. They ONLY attaches to the goose ball and does use the pucks at all.

 

https://andersenhitches.com/Catalog/gooseneck-mount--ultimate-5th-wheel-connection.aspx

https://www.bwtrailerhitches.com/companion-single-point-attachment

 

Either of these would be the solution to connect 5th wheel RVs (and other 5th wheel connections) that will still work on the new trucks if you already own it, because it isn't reliant on the puck placement.

Posted

I had one of the B&W Companion hitches that used their Turnover ball mount (gooseneck) and it worked very well.  I used it for several years before going with an air ride hitch that uses rails or an adapter.  It was on a truck that had nothing but the gooseneck ball mount system.  There was no issue with it spinning.  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...