Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I own a 2019 GMC SLT Sierra with a multi-pro tailgate.  The opening between the main tailgate and the interior tailgate allows water, dirt and snow to come through the 3/4 inch crack between the main and interior tailgate.  The very top lip of the tailgate between the two tailgates has a huge opening which continues to the bottom of the interior tailgate.  GM failed install weather stripping or a seal in this area, so water, dirt and snow will seep through easily through the large crack.  I have a Lomar Tonneau cover and when I went through a car wash yesterday, my interior box bed was wet about 2 ft in from the exterior bed.  If you place a flashlight inside your truck bed and have a Tonneau cover you will see why this crack between the two tailgates allows so much water into the truck bed.  If you view the photos attached, I have circled in red the area that a weather stripping seal is needed.  My GM dealership told me, if I wanted a dryer truck bed, I should have ordered a Yukon.  All owners of a 2019 or 2020 GM with a multi-pro tailgate need to express our disappointment with this design and demand that GM fix the design flaw.  

 

Chev owners don't know how lucky they are not to have a multi-pro tailgate.  I understand chev will be adding the multi-pro tailgate in 2021.-do=add#.url-do=add#.url550453139_Tailgatesealneeded.JPG.b01f46def487f4342ebbe8a9829267d1.JPG  

Tailgate seal - missing area.JPG

Tailgate missing seal.JPG

Posted

Not sure who "our" is but I think you are the first to post of water intrusion with the multi pro gate here.  No pickup truck boxes are entirely waterproof to begin with.  Most are open under the bed rails for proper air flow/venting and even the regular tailgates aren't waterproof.   

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Of course I understand, but you have to admit that water would not seep into the bed from the bottom, like it does now from the top with a Multi-pro poor design tailgate.  Please admit the multi-pro design is not the best for those of us that add Tonneau covers as we would like to keep items in the truck bed dry.   Go back to the factory and figure out a fix.

 

Thank you,

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, newdude said:

Not sure who "our" is but I think you are the first to post of water intrusion with the multi pro gate here.  No pickup truck boxes are entirely waterproof to begin with.  Most are open under the bed rails for proper air flow/venting and even the regular tailgates aren't waterproof.   

 

Agree.  My 2020 Chev gets wet about 2' into the box as well after going through a high pressure wash.  I have the Embark cover.

  • Like 1
Posted

I sometimes wonder if I made a mistake not getting the GMC. Now not so sure. 

Posted

I don't understand why you think GM is responsible for your bed not staying dry when that is never a design criteria of theirs, at least not from the truck design side.  The bed is designed to be open and get wet.  If you want it dry that would fall on whoever designed your cover for covering up all of the other "cracks" and providing a solution for that.  

Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, DianaNeal39 said:

Of course I understand, but you have to admit that water would not seep into the bed from the bottom, like it does now from the top with a Multi-pro poor design tailgate.  Please admit the multi-pro design is not the best for those of us that add Tonneau covers as we would like to keep items in the truck bed dry.   Go back to the factory and figure out a fix. 

 

Thank you,

 

GM will be of zero help as well.  Especially since you have an aftermarket tonneau cover.  If you had a GM one they might express some concern, but having an aftermarket cover is ripe for the ol' "its aftermarket so it might not be sealing properly".    

 

My Colorado would get a bit of water with a GM tonneau, no multi pro gate.  My K2 would get a bit of water spray with a GM tonneau, no multi pro.  Its not a multi pro gate only thing.  Watch for the aftermarket to have a seal kit as the aftermarket makes tailgate seal kits for regular gates as it is. 

Edited by newdude
  • Like 2
Posted

You can buy bed or tailgate seal from a few different manufacturers in bulk rolls from 10' to 100' for about $2 to $3 per foot if you really want to completely seal it from water or dust. My GMC dealer offered a tailgate seal which they sell for the gap between the bottom of the bed and bottom of the tailgate when I bought my GMC tonneau cover for my 2019 Sierra Denali with Multi-Pro tailgate, but I refused as I wanted any water that may be present in the bed to drain out there as designed. None of my other trucks (Ford, GMC or Chevy) ever had a tailgate seal and they all got some very minor amount of water in them when I went through a car wash but not otherwise, and it was easily wiped dry with a towel. However my 2005 Tahoe SUV did have a seal around the rear tailgate door and did not let water, dust or even air in it. This is not a design flaw and GM will not be changing it but instead will leave it up the end user to add whatever bed or tailgate seal they prefer, or not, as they and all other truck manufacturers always have for nearly 100 years. 

Posted

When I first saw the prototype for this new gate, my first thought wasn't, "wow, what a useful innovation". Instead it was, "great, another crevice to collect dirt, debris, water and rust."

 

I'm not surprised in the least.

  • Like 2
Posted

It doesn't work how you want it to so it is a flaw? If GM wanted it to be perfectly sealed, they would have. A flaw is an overlook in the purpose or structure, the tailgate operates as designed. There was 0% of the design attributed to sealing the bed, has been that was with every tailgate from every manufacturer since the tailgate and pick up was invented. You want it sealed, go buy a roll or rubber and do it. Even the normal tailgate when the pressure washer hits from the rear a good amount of water comes in the bed, the gaps on the sides are large. Not sure why everyone deems something a flaw or problem if it doesn't operate the way they think it should (IE the drop down hitting a hitch), it is designed to work as such. The regular tailgates aren't sealed, no reason the mini multi-pro would be too. Should probably rename this thread so as not to mislead people...

 

Tyler

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I have had many trucks in the past and none of them sealed perfectly to keep water out with a tonneau cover. None of them let much water in either. My new AT4 is exactly the same as all of the others. It let in exactly the same amount as my others. I have the gm rev cover on my AT4.

Posted

I have the Retrax ProXR and have been working on getting it as waterproof as possible.  Most of the water I have is coming in through that gap between the 2 sections of the tailgate.  I picked up this weatherstripping from Lowes and put some at the very top on the plastic cap between the 2 tailgates.  That stopped a large amount of the water coming back there.  I think I still have some coming in between the larger gate and the bed on the sides - still working on that piece.  I also have a Rok Block tailgate seal, but haven't installed yet - waiting to get the water coming in from the top addressed before I seal up the main exit path for it.     

 

https://www.lowes.com/pd/M-D-13-ft-x-1-in-Expand-N-Seal-Foam-Window-Weatherstrip/1000460601

Posted

Dave,

 

Could you send a photo, as to how you installed the weather stripping on the top?  I was in my GM dealership today and asked them to discuss my concerns with GM.

 

Thank you, 

Posted (edited)

Any Sierra trim can be ordered without a multipro tailgate. 

 

 

Edited by redwngr
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...