Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Typically draining a battery at high levels shortens the life... sometimes drastically. 

  • 9 months later...
Posted (edited)
On 1/20/2021 at 12:34 PM, LDM said:

This right here.  The infrastructure for electric cars isn't there and it will cost billions to make it capable of handling the load required.  Not to mention where is all this energy going to come from?  Solar and wind?  Those can't even supply what we now need, let alone what we will need when 90+% of the vehicles on the road are electric.  Right now electricity is cheap in many areas but once everyone has to start paying for all that infrastructure and power plants, the costs will skyrocket.  If people think $4-5 gas is expensive, wait until you are paying $1+ for a kWh of electricity for all your power needs at home and for your electric car.  Those electric cars will cost more to buy and more to operate than anyone in this country is going to be willing to pay.

You talk like we've got an unlimited supply of oil, and we're doing this just because some people want change.  We've got a few years left to figure it out, but we probably shouldn't kick the can down the road for too much longer...  World Oil Statistics - Worldometer (worldometers.info)  

 

Edited by Dmax3
grammar
Posted (edited)
On 1/23/2020 at 12:22 PM, L86 All Terrain said:

Cold climates can reduce a batteries ability by up to 90%. Take your phone out and leave it on the deck and see if it hasn't died in an hour. It's -30c here for a few months, I get mad enough at my phone, I don't need to be kicking my truck because I can only get 100 miles on a charge. Not saving the environment anyway, you're just reducing fuel, and supplementing it with electricity that is primarily generated through burning of fuels. Six of one, half a dozen of the other.  

We don't really have a choice.  These need to be developed and will take a few iterations to perfect. 

Edited by Dmax3
Posted

I’ve been around for many change claims. Coming ice age to warming now just climate change. Well yes the climate does change. I remember just 20 years we’ll be out of oil, that was 40 years ago. Then came fracking. Some say 100 years. When you get my age, 66 you learn they know nothing. Follow the money. Never count out technology, it can’t be rushed. Nuclear is the best example. Jane Fonda killed that one, imagine that. 

  • Like 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Dmax3 said:

You talk like we've got an unlimited supply of oil, and we're doing this just because some people want change.  We've got a few years left to figure it out, but we probably shouldn't kick the can down the road for too much longer...  World Oil Statistics - Worldometer (worldometers.info)  

 

The same "professional sources" that have lied to us about EVERYTHING certainly aren't telling us the truth about fossil fuels.  They also claim we have a "climate crises" that requires all individuals to give up freedoms, property rights, while the elite still continue to purchase ocean front homes.  The same "professional sources" have flip-flopped more times than one can count and remember in regards to global warming/climate change/death rate statistics and have manipulated data for quite possibly centuries.  All whilst ignoring the fact that we're actually headed for global cooling and a subsequent mini-ice age as sorts.

Keep drinking their kool-aide and you're bound to end up like the followers of Jim Jones.

Posted (edited)

Was waiting for TFL to do it, and they did.  Ike Gauntlet in the Rivian:

 

 

 

 

I like that they filmed the trip to the Ike to indicate range hit just to get to the test.  And boy, it took a hit.  Also.  EVs don't get power loss at elevation like ICE, so if this was even a loop test on fairly normal expressways instead of the Ike, the test should be repeatable at 900ft and 9000ft.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

That will not sell Rivian for towing!!! RANGE ANXIETY. 
I was surprised how small it is. 

Edited by customboss
  • Like 1
Posted
On 1/31/2022 at 10:47 AM, Dmax3 said:

You talk like we've got an unlimited supply of oil, and we're doing this just because some people want change.  We've got a few years left to figure it out, but we probably shouldn't kick the can down the road for too much longer...  World Oil Statistics - Worldometer (worldometers.info)  

 

According to these same sources we should have run out of oil by now.  Hasn't happened and isn't going to anytime soon.  I'll stick with my current gas powered truck over useless electric vehicles than can't do what most people need them to.

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, LDM said:

According to these same sources we should have run out of oil by now.  Hasn't happened and isn't going to anytime soon.  I'll stick with my current gas powered truck over useless electric vehicles than can't do what most people need them to.

With the 11" of snow we got today there's no way any electric snow blower would have been able to run for 3 hours.  The stupid a-holes who do product reviews for the electric snow blowers try to spin having to stop work to recharge batteries as some sort of joyous occasion.  My arse it is!

Edited by BlaineBug
Posted

I use battery powered weed eaters, hedge trimmer’s, leaf blower. Same brands, same batteries. I have several batteries and chargers. Shouldn’t be a problem adding a snowblower.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I use battery powered weed eaters, hedge trimmer’s, leaf blower. Same brands, same batteries. I have several batteries and chargers. Shouldn’t be a problem adding a snowblower.

Same, I have never had any success with 2 or 4 stroke residential grade leaf blowers or weed wackers, and never wanted to pay commercial grade pricing!  I went electric on these.  The Harbor Freight weed wacker only uses a half battery but I had to buy 3 batteries for my Milwaukee leaf blower, and that's not for actually blowing leaves, that's just for grass clippings!  Residential only, no commercial work, just my home.  I do have to agree with you though considering that you live in Texas, you will certainly absolutely encounter little issue with a battery powered snow blower!

Edited by BlaineBug
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, BlaineBug said:

Same, I have never had any success with 2 or 4 stroke residential grade leaf blowers or weed wackers, and never wanted to pay commercial grade pricing!  I went electric on these.  The Harbor Freight weed wacker only uses a half battery but I had to buy 3 batteries for my Milwaukee leaf blower, and that's not for actually blowing leaves, that's just for grass clippings!  Residential only, no commercial work, just my home.  I do have to agree with you though considering that you live in Texas, you will certainly absolutely encounter little issue with a battery powered snow blower!

I spent 40 years listening to those screaming two stokes. I started using battery powered around the house 20 years ago. I do have a plug in blower for heavy work. When my latest riding mower wears out if battery power isn’t too expensive I may get one. I’ve seen battery power snow blowers, no need for one here.

Posted
4 hours ago, BlaineBug said:

With the 11" of snow we got today there's no way any electric snow blower would have been able to run for 3 hours.  The stupid a-holes who do product reviews for the electric snow blowers try to spin having to stop work to recharge batteries as some sort of joyous occasion.  My arse it is!

Agreed.  I spent an hour and half in the morning clearing my driveway and then another 45 minutes later in the day.  I've had this same snow blower for over 15 years and aside from putting gas in it and changing the oil, it starts first pull every time.  No battery is going to last 15 years, especially when some years I don't even have to use it because we don't really get any snow.  There are certain devices that work great with batteries, like my black and decker cordless drills, weed eater, and reciprocating saw.  But when it comes to something like a truck that actually gets used for towing and work, batteries are just about useless to power something like that.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 1/31/2022 at 11:47 AM, Dmax3 said:

You talk like we've got an unlimited supply of oil, and we're doing this just because some people want change.  

 

We do have an unlimited supply.  Communists, Fellow Travelers and Useful Idiots are actively pushing this nonsense.  Any serious student of history can expose these farces.

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 555 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...