Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 hours ago, truckguy82 said:

Did the new 5.3 get a lot faster or something?

 

I’ve driven numerous 5.3 and 6.2 loaners and a t1xx 6.2 loaner, and my own k2xx 6.2

 

You guys are smoking crack if you think the 6.2 and 5.3 are remotely close in performance.

 

6.2 feels like you slapped a blower on a 5.3.

It's probably 4-5 tenths quicker in the 1/4 over the previous 5.3's.  The 6.2 is obviously quicker in every way but the race isn't a blowout like I expected. 

Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, 19AT4 said:

Yep it didn't make any sense to me, I know they'd both do much better at sea level.  In the cab I could hardly notice a difference in power, he previously had a 8 speed 6.2 and he said the new one is a dog compared to his last one.  I hear the 8 speeds were quicker in the 1/4 mile.  I've yet to find any videos of the new 6.2 in the 13.9 range stock. 

According to Car & Driver, the 8 speed 6.2 was actually the slowest. All tests are on similar configuration, fully loaded trucks. 14 was a Denali, 15 and 19 are High Countries.

 

2014: 0-60 5.4s, 1/4 14.1 @ 99

2015: 0-60 5.7s, 1/4 14.3 @ 98

2019: 0-60 5.4s, 1/4 13.9 @ 100

 

Realistically, on the street it would be a coin flip for any of the 3. 
 

The only comparative figures I have from someone else with a Dragy on the 19+ trucks was an AT4 6.2 with the similar intake / exhaust mods as mine. That being a factory lifted truck on A/T tires and with 3.23s instead of 3.42s did 0-60 in 5.71. So really not that far off from mine. Another virtual coin flip. These 6.2 trucks are not any slower or faster than the last gen. 5.3 definitely is quicker though.
 

 

Edited by OnTheReel
Posted
12 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

According to Car & Driver, the 8 speed 6.2 was actually the slowest. All tests are on similar configuration, fully loaded trucks. 14 was a Denali, 15 and 19 are High Countries.

 

 

2014: 0-60 5.4s, 1/4 14.1 @ 99

2015: 0-60 5.7s, 1/4 14.3 @ 98

2019: 0-60 5.4s, 1/4 13.9 @ 100

 

Realistically, on the street it would be a coin flip for any of the 3. 
 

The only comparative figures I have from someone else with a Dragy on the 19+ trucks was an AT4 6.2 with the similar intake / exhaust mods as mine. That being a factory lifted truck on A/T tires and with 3.23s instead of 3.42s did 0-60 in 5.71. So really not that far off from mine. Another virtual coin flip. These 6.2 trucks are not any slower or faster than the last gen. 5.3 definitely is quicker though.
 

 

My dd is a tuned 6.2

 

I had a ‘19 denali loaner for 3 days.

 

It felt like the performance was in between my truck stock and my truck tuned.

 

despite what any numbers say, the unmodded for unmodden, t1xx is way way better feeling. I would not tune it if I bought one. It fell pretty similar to my tuned 6.2. Stock K2xx felt like gm let a bunch of 5th graders tune the throttle and torque management for a class project. 
 

interesting that the 5.3 got significantly quicker, I wasn’t aware of that.

Posted

I drove a new style 19 for a couple days and it seemed a lot quicker than my old tuned 5.3, like you can tell it's about 500 lbs lighter.  Its kinda disappointing that the new 6.2s aren't that much quicker or at all quicker than the old style.  They definitely don't feel 500 lbs lighter than the old style.     

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, SILVER SLED said:

I drove a new style 19 for a couple days and it seemed a lot quicker than my old tuned 5.3, like you can tell it's about 500 lbs lighter.  Its kinda disappointing that the new 6.2s aren't that much quicker or at all quicker than the old style.  They definitely don't feel 500 lbs lighter than the old style.     

500 LBS is really for the more stripped down models . Other higher models dont see that much weight savings.

The 5.3 for sure got quicker because of the 8 speed vs 6 speed .  Its able to stay in higher RPM. 

The 6.2  8 speed vs 10 speed is very close in performance. I do also agree its disappointing the GM has not touched their engines power in going on almost 8 years  now. I also understand these are trucks and not race cars so the power is  more then adequate. One thing i wish GM did was give you more gear options like RAM and Ford do . 

A 6.2 with 3.55 or even 3.73 would be much quicker then 3.23 

 

Edited by f8l vnm
Posted
8 hours ago, f8l vnm said:

500 LBS is really for the more stripped down models . Other higher models dont see that much weight savings.

 

The 5.3 for sure got quicker because of the 8 speed vs 6 speed .  Its able to stay in higher RPM. 

The 6.2  8 speed vs 10 speed is very close in performance. I do also agree its disappointing the GM has not touched their engines power in going on almost 8 years  now. I also understand these are trucks and not race cars so the power is  more then adequate. One thing i wish GM did was give you more gear options like RAM and Ford do . 

A 6.2 with 3.55 or even 3.73 would be much quicker then 3.23 

 

The 5.3 had the 8 speed available in the k2xx

 

 

Posted

I can tell you that I had a 2018 Sierra with 6.2L 3.23 8spd. I now have a 2019 Silverado 6.2L 3.23 with 10 spd. I can tell you this new 19 would beat my 18. The 10 spd is so dialed in it's crazy, and to be able to put it into sport mode makes it even snappier. I also had my 18 tuned with a Hypertech programmer.  Made huge difference in performance, but this 19 would still have beaten it. The 8spds in the 6.2Ls have a clunking/hesitation problem between 1st/2nd gear. Was always hunting when driving around town. This new 10spd does none of that! 

Posted

I test drove the 5.3 vs the 6.2 since I wanted to see if the difference was worth the upgrade cost. No brainer. I don’t know the details of the trans or the gearing but it was a night and day difference between how the 2020 trucks accelerated. Total no brainer. I gladly paid the difference and got the 6.2 in my Sierra. In every way it felt stronger. It was the most apparent on the roll on but even from a dead start the 6.2 felt MUCH faster that the 5.3. I don’t care about the MPG difference. These are huge fat trucks after all. 

  • 8 months later...
Posted

Bone Stock 2021 LTZ 6.2 10 speed. Cold salty road. Sport, TCS off, Brake torque 2200 rpms got the best result. I'm really impressed with this truck this engine trans combo is great. 

Screenshot_20210127-183627_dragy.thumb.jpg.ade5cb48ec56c70c8078edb4e172e39f.jpg

Posted

Nice numbers. Ya the new T1 5.3Ls are a HUGE upgrade over the K2s and it’s because of the transmission. The K2s were lazy shifting and hindered by GMs programming. 
 

GM did a great job reprogramming the 8 spd and 10 spd transmissions in the T1s. The new 5.3L is great but it doesn’t compare to the 6.2L. 
 

Car and Driver had 6.2L @ 5.4 secs

        And a 5.3L @ 6.1 secs. 
 

Still very respectable when the last 5.3L they had did it in 7.2 secs.  So shaving a second is quite impressive. 
 

Mu stepdads 2020 Sierra SLT 5.3L with 10 spd is no slouch. It greatly impressed me because I owned 2 K2 5.3L. One with a 6 spd and other with the 8 spd. 

Posted (edited)

So the 6.2 is going to beat the 5.3 to the next stop light by a couple tenths of a second.  It's a $2500 option and you have to run premium fuel in it. 

I know I must be missing something but I can't figure out what.  5.3 10 speed in a pickup truck seems plenty enough for me. 

 

Unless of course you're young and have been picked on your whole life, then by all means get the 6.2 and hammer the snot out of it from stop light to stop light and  show em who's boss, lol!

 

Me, well I'm happy with the length of my manhood and my 5.3.

Edited by steelcity
Posted

I would pay the up charge if was in the Texas Edition trucks I was buying back in the day. The trouble was when I was buying new every couple years. They weren’t discounting the 6.2 equips trucks. The up charge was usually 12-15K. That pays for lots of mods.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, steelcity said:

So the 6.2 is going to beat the 5.3 to the next stop light by a couple tenths of a second.  It's a $2500 option and you have to run premium fuel in it. 

I know I must be missing something but I can't figure out what.  5.3 10 speed in a pickup truck seems plenty enough for me. 

 

Unless of course you're young and have been picked on your whole life, then by all means get the 6.2 and hammer the snot out of it from stop light to stop light and  show em who's boss, lol!

 

Me, well I'm happy with the length of my manhood and my 5.3.

A couple tenths of a second huh?? A couple is 2. Last I checked it was about 7 tenths which is pretty big when racing. 
 

I’m 39 years old and still love to mash on the truck every now and then. It’s a joy driving a truck that can go 0-60 in under 6 seconds. As for the “picked on” as a kid statement. Pretty lame!  I don’t see how enjoying 420 HP and being bullied relate. Maybe it’s you that can’t afford the $2500 up charge and the cost of premium fuel????. And your envious of that??????
 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, KARNUT said:

I would pay the up charge if was in the Texas Edition trucks I was buying back in the day. The trouble was when I was buying new every couple years. They weren’t discounting the 6.2 equips trucks. The up charge was usually 12-15K. That pays for lots of mods.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I agree.  The new trucks are discounted no matter what they have in them. I couldn’t believe my 2018 Sierra with the 6.2L had $12,500 off of it when I bought it. Blew my mind. 
now I just wish they would offer it in all trim levels, along the 10 speed across the board as well. 

Posted

I always see this 6.1sec 0-60mph from C&D for the 5.3L. Were they going downhill with a tailwind? 

 

My 5.3L / 8spd hasn't gotten anywhere near that. And I have the GMPE and CAI, which does seem to have maybe helped quicken things up a tad bit, but not that much. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,920
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Frank V
    Newest Member
    Frank V
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,346 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Folks, Have a great new 2026 WT  (std cab, 2.7/4WD) w/base 40/20/40 mech adj bench "fake buckets"  (with lower and upper center console) heavy vinyl seats.  Overall the seats are very comfortable and the vinyl is heavy and appears less likely to 'split out'. Am very tall (6'5")  + a bad back/osteporosis/former hyperparathyroidism so ease/range of movement is a bit restricted.  The truck rides a bit high and I use a nerf step bar w/my left foot to step in, then I put right foot/leg in, drag my butt in  & get seated.  Worked fine in my 2018 RAM quadCab. But I end up dragging my butt over the left raised sidecushsion area of vinyl seat, and due to texture there's fair amount of traction on slide inward.  (ArmorAll didn't improve.) If the seat were even ~1/2" - 3/4" lower it'd be helpful, but base seats just have the forward/backward underseat bail and the side lever for tilt which really doesn't affect seat height.   I really don't want to 'de-puff' the left side sidecushion forming the  fake 'bucket'. I know one company sells 'seat elevator blocks':  but is there a simple way of lowering the height of the driver seat instead?   Thanks Bill W San Jose  
    • I have a basic 2026 1500 WT  (2.7L/4WD reg cab shorttbed). Comfy, generally happy with electronics/radio - but is there a way I can add switches to steering wheel right-side position (curr. empty) so I can adjust volume, push phone button to voice dial, etc? Bill W San Jose  
    • The curb weight on a 1 ton crew cab long bed is around 7k lbs.  Now, I don't know where you went to school but 9k is not more than 2x 7k lbs. More than 2x 7k lbs would be 14k+.   With that said, obviously yes you're going to feel a 9k lb trailer when slowing down.  I already said, when accelerating.  When changing lanes?  No.  But if you look at the context of what was quoted, the original person said, "after a mile or two..." which means that would be after the accelerating portion and you're driving a generally steady pace.  Please do learn to read and comprehend.
    • So I purchased the Range unit for my 2026 and I am seeing different locations suggested for the ECM . Can anyone confirm wither under hood, left side or right side or behind the wheelwell?
    • Like I've said before. Di and Carbon buildup is not that big of a concern. Engine had minimal buildup, and that engine was obviously not super well maintained. Do regular oil changes, and you're gtg as long as the rest of the truck lasts. Also, the High Pressure FP that people ****** about, but can't tell you why.  Now, I wish they'd trash the variable oil pump. No real world issues with them, but I'll gladly eat whatever miniscule MPG it's saving me in favor of more oil at all RPMs.    Curious to see his assessment of the 7.3 compared to the 6.6. I expect he'll praise the port inj, but from a structural standpoint, the 6.6 is as robust as any engine out there.    Not to take away from the 7.3. I feel it's equally as good as the 6.6.     As to heat on the rear cyls, I'd have to see numerous examples before I'd say it's an issue. Especially not knowing the history of that engine. For all is known, they could have blown a rad hose, and ran it hot, and the 2 rear cyls may be the first to get hot in a low coolant situation, but not be an issue aside from that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...