Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 9/14/2021 at 9:27 PM, OnTheReel said:


Still would need AWD for sure. 600+ HP in a 2WD truck that weighs nothing in the back would be completely worthless. Even the normal 6.2 is basically worthless if you just leave it in 2WD.
 

The big appeal to these trucks is the traction. On the street you can take down some fairly quick cars. At least up to 60. After that you can’t really fight physics. Or that speeding ticket.

This is why I put mine in Auto 4x4 when pulling out in traffic making a right hand turn.  If i don't then I just light up the rear tires.

Edited by Black02Silverado
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, It's Tim said:

I always feel sorry for peeps that get stuck with that 2.7 and post here looking for any type of upgrade. The threads always start the same: "It's not that bad", um... ya it is.

I’m cautiously impressed with blown little engines. One of GMs finest moments was the blown 4.3. I owed T- type briefly. Had a friend who had a shop full. It’s a shame I couldn’t get over the sound. I was still in had to be a V-8 stage. My wife’s intagra type r and V-6 Genesis converted me toward alternative power, other than V8s. Diesels excluded. Some of the fast and furious types who now drive pickups. Will probably make them V-8 killers. Unfortunately they probably have cylinder deactivation. Otherwise I could see myself in a tuner 2 door version. 

Edited by KARNUT
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, It's Tim said:

I always feel sorry for peeps that get stuck with that 2.7 and post here looking for any type of upgrade. The threads always start the same: "It's not that bad", um... ya it is.

 

I see the same amount of threads/posts about modding 6.2/5.3 as I do 2.7 

Its not a hot Rod and its not some crazy high HP/high TQ engine. Its the base model engine that happens to have good torque throughout the powerband and gets pretty damn good mileage. All while being able to haul/tow respectable amount of weight.  ( if you have smaller loads) 

Its funny how some people on here are almost threatened by the 2.7 . ( Grumpy Bear ) being he biggest hater but then again he just loves his 4.3 haha 

End of day i will drive that GM 6.2 all day and will continue to by my GM trucks with the 6.2 or a V8 but that's just me ,however lets take a moment here to give GM its props. They axed the dinosaur 4.3 and are giving us a motor that gets more power, more torque and better mileage. 

 

Edited by f8l vnm
Posted
On 9/14/2021 at 12:09 PM, Amcguy1970 said:

 

Best or favorite/nicest? Not sure how someone can say best ever a year in without waiting to see if it has any problems or things pop up they don't like; unless this is your first vehicle ever I guess or you only keep a vehicle for a year? We usually wait until we get rid of a vehicle to determine how good it was. Best for us was a 91' Astro van, though not the nicest it was the most reliable and lasted the longest with no problems outside of an alternator over nearly 250k; all the while spending much of the time towing a boat at its weight limit with a family of 4 in it around the great lakes.

 

Because no one can tell the 10hp difference and the less than 1mpg difference between regular and premium doesn't cover the cost upgrade... It isn't like you get a 50hp bump or anything, it is minimal and the cost savings favors regular. Now towing or hauling or running hard we use premium, otherwise it is 87 most of the time. If it was required that would be a different story. 

 

Tyler

No it's not my first vehicle. I've had many other vehicles over the years some of which I put over 150,000 miles on. I also am from Michigan and tow boats and trailers. I was just stating that this is the best truck I've owned since none of the previous came with the kind of power of the 6.2L smoothness of the 10 spd transmission and technology this current truck has.

Posted (edited)

You folks running 87 are going to eventually break your rings and or pistons, maybe not you if you trade it in after a couple of years, but the next poor sap will suffer for your sins.

 

You cannot always hear knocking and pinging, you have to use a scan tool to see it.

 

These latest DFM engines do not detect fuel quality and then run on a different set of tables AFAIK.  The previous generations did not.

 

For those of you willing to take the challenge, get an OBDII adapter that works with your truck and phone, get an app that works with both and then watch it while you drive on a tank of swill and a tank of 93.  

 

Racetrac 93, not top tier, 0% alcohol content.  6.5" Lift on 35s. Stock tune.

 

Love the 6.2, it is so much more powerful than our 5.3 and they are very fuel efficient for what they are.  Ours came with 3.73 gears, it gets up goes and is rated to tow over 5 tons.  Reminds me of the Grand Nationals I used to have.  Fun stuff!

 

Even my 5.3 benefits from running 93, the engine runs cooler, smoother and gets better gas mileage.

Edited by swathdiver
additional information
  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, swathdiver said:

You folks running 87 are going to eventually break your rings and or pistons, maybe not you if you trade it in after a couple of years, but the next poor sap will suffer for your sins.

 

You cannot always hear knocking and pinging, you have to use a scan tool to see it.

 

These latest DFM engines do not detect fuel quality and then run on a different set of tables AFAIK.  The previous generations did not.

 

For those of you willing to take the challenge, get an OBDII adapter that works with your truck and phone, get an app that works with both and then watch it while you drive on a tank of swill and a tank of 93.  

 

Racetrac 93, not top tier, 0% alcohol content.  6.5" Lift on 35s. Stock tune.

 

Love the 6.2, it is so much more powerful than our 5.3 and they are very fuel efficient for what they are.  Ours came with 3.73 gears, it gets up goes and is rated to tow over 5 tons.  Reminds me of the Grand Nationals I used to have.  Fun stuff!

 

Even my 5.3 benefits from running 93, the engine runs cooler, smoother and gets better gas mileage.

Finally someone understands why you should run 91/93 premium fuel in the 6.2L👍👍

 

When you say 3.73 gears. We’re you stating you have them in your 6.2L or 5.3L. Because I thought all you could get with the max trailer package was 3.42 rear end on the 6.2L 

Edited by TNTSilverado
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, TNTSilverado said:

Finally someone understands why you should run 91/93 premium fuel in the 6.2L👍👍

 

When you say 3.73 gears. We’re you stating you have them in your 6.2L or 5.3L. Because I thought all you could get with the max trailer package was 3.42 rear end on the 6.2L 

Our 6.2 came with them, it is a 2012 Sierra Crew Cab with the NHT package.

179235801.jpg

Edited by swathdiver
Posted

My 2021 is my 3rd 6.2, still only 2500 miles runs a bit better since I GM Accessories Borla Cat Back on.

My 2018 Max Tow was used as a workhorse for my retirement move from Michigan to Tennessee, really towed outstanding with many heavy loads.  Free Truck, sold it for more than I paid for it.

My 2012 actually ran the best, great throttle response an great stock muffler sound.

 

Pics in post below.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, swathdiver said:

Our 6.2 came with them, it is a 2012 Sierra Crew Cab with the NHT package.

179235801.jpg

Ah yes the older trucks!!  Gotcha, yes they did and they performed very well.  Sharp looking truck. Thanks! 

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, CXXX said:

My 2021 is my 3rd 6.2, still only 2500 miles runs a bit better since I GM Accessories Borla Cat Back on.

My 2018 Max Tow was used as a workhorse for my retirement move from Michigan to Tennessee, really towed outstanding with many heavy loads.  Free Truck, sold it for more than I paid for it.

My 2012 actually ran the best, great throttle response an great stock muffler sound.

 

Pics in post below.

 

 

 

 

That 2012 is a rare bird, we've only found 80 SLT All-Terrains so far!  

  • Like 1
Posted

I think that they (GM and Ford) say you can run regular ‘cause most rednecks wouldn’t buy a truck knowing they HAD to run premium.

 

Most folks consider me a redneck, so please don’t take that offensively! 😉

  • Haha 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I'm on my second 6.2L 10speed combo, the first was a 2018 RWD Yukon Denali. That little thing was fast and a lot of fun to drive, it pulled my 21' bass boat and just chuckled the whole time. Moved to the panhandle from Central Florida and the fishing is a little different so I sold the bass boat for a 24' bay boat. The Yukon pulled the larger boat fine but as far as towing it the bay boat just kinda overwhelmed the short wheel base of that vehicle.

 

Decided to get a truck for towing the bigger boat and because I needed the versatility of a truck versus the SUV. Figued I could get a 2020 4WD 5.3 with the 10 speed and all would be good because the 5.3s I've owned previously were basically bullet proof plus the 10 speed is so smooth and always seems to find the right gear. To put it simply I was wrong, the 5.3 did an adequate job but I did end up replacing it with a 2021 4WD 6.2 because I so missed the extra power. No question the 6.2 does a night and day difference in the way it pulls a load like this. I got a shade better fuel economy in town with the 5.3 but the 6.2 gets much better economy towing and is a lot more fun to drive.

Edited by JJ461
Posted
On 9/14/2021 at 8:27 PM, OnTheReel said:

Still would need AWD for sure. 600+ HP in a 2WD truck that weighs nothing in the back would be completely worthless. Even the normal 6.2 is basically worthless if you just leave it in 2WD.

 

Nail on the head here. My truck (e85 tuned L86) is worthless from a dig in 2WD. Not to mention that it would axle wrap and hop like a buckin' bronco. The exact reason I put traction bars on my truck :) maybe one day GM will employ a 5 link or even IRS. By then I'll probably be driving an electric truck though. 

Posted
On 9/15/2021 at 8:29 AM, Black02Silverado said:

This is why I put mine in Auto 4x4 when pulling out in traffic making a right hand turn.  If i don't then I just light up the rear tires.

Hmmmm. Not to tell anyone how to drive or anything...... The idea of needing to switch into 4x4 because otherwise you would loose traction to the rear end in your heavy throttle take off seems absurd. I've owned my 6.2 for almost a year. Have never had to even consider loss of traction when pulling out into traffic. Maybe wait and let that car pass then pull out when you have more time. Because of your set up you may have time to avoid a collision, but does the driver of the car you pulled out in front of know that? Consider the effect your action has on that driver.

Flame on...

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,564 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...