Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 11/5/2021 at 3:55 PM, newdude said:

The new t-stat is good, but its 5 years too late.  They should have had this from when these 2014's came out.  

 

This is a great option however, for those that want to have the thermostat especially for winter operations.  Running cooler is good, but running too cool (winter) could potentially lead to moisture concerns in the fluid (think GM 8 speed fluid where the prior formulas were too absorbing of water).  

 

Driving hard in my Sure Cool'd 6L80 on a hot day, I can get it to maybe 170F but no hotter.  The new stat should perform somewhat similarly when its opened.  

 

Also, one thing to take note, at some point in 2015 GM stopped flowing the trans through the radiator and the cooler.  Late 2015's its trans straight out to the cooler that is part of the condenser.  2014 to early 2015 its trans to the engine radiator, then to the aux cooler, so those trucks with a t-stat delete would still run warmer than a late 2015-2018 and 2019 LD.

How cool is too cool for winter driving?

Posted
42 minutes ago, steelerdude15 said:

How cool is too cool for winter driving?

 

 

I'd say if it never gets over 95F.  Basically if you do nothing but short trips, it could lead to moisture not burning off.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

I'd say if it never gets over 95F.  Basically if you do nothing but short trips, it could lead to moisture not burning off.  

 

This was kind of my concern as well after the pill flip. Not as much about the moisture as I wasnt even aware about that. But the idea that in much colder weather, the fluid would be slow to warm up enough if it even did for shifting. In warmer weather, wasnt too worried but colder winter weather did have me a bit concerned and that's why I was slow to do the original mod. I guess now I will never know as the new 158⁰ thermostat is installed. Most of my daily driving consists of a few runs of maybe 2 to 3 miles max. It isn't until some weekends where I end up with a a couple nice 55-60 mile or more drives. 

Edited by mikeyk101
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, steelerdude15 said:

How cool is too cool for winter driving?

 

39 minutes ago, newdude said:

I'd say if it never gets over 95F.  Basically if you do nothing but short trips, it could lead to moisture not burning off.  

 

That's cooler than I would have thought. Think I saw 104 F as a 'trigger' in a tuning table 1SLOW1500 showed once. 

 

Unlike the motor 'moisture' is not generated in a transmission as a combustion byproduct. It's absorbed from the atmosphere.  Here's a pretty good writeup from Machinery Lubrication on that topic. 

 

https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/192/water-contaminant-oil

 

Some moisture is present in ALL lubricating fluids. The object of the game is controlling/limiting the concentration levels.

 

The easiest and most effect way of controlling its concentration is by regular fluid exchange. Take a breath.... the severe schedule in your manual is normally often enough. 45K. Personally, I do a partial every 25K. Color is a good indicator. Hazy is approaching the danger point. 

 

  • Like 6
Posted

All of the concerns would be eliminated if you change the fluid IMO. Short cold trips, switch to a 100% synthetic. Red Line?

If you use semi synthetic fluid, 25 k exchange? Using 100% synthetic, 40 -50 k?

Me and Grumpy have preached more fluid changes are good. Has worked for me for along time. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, newdude said:

 

 

I'd say if it never gets over 95F.  Basically if you do nothing but short trips, it could lead to moisture not burning off.  

 

25 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

 

That's cooler than I would have thought. Think I saw 104 F as a 'trigger' in a tuning table 1SLOW1500 showed once. 

 

Unlike the motor 'moisture' is not generated in a transmission as a combustion byproduct. It's absorbed from the atmosphere.  Here's a pretty good writeup from Machinery Lubrication on that topic. 

 

https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/192/water-contaminant-oil

 

Some moisture is present in ALL lubricating fluids. The object of the game is controlling/limiting the concentration levels.

 

The easiest and most effect way of controlling its concentration is by regular fluid exchange. Take a breath.... the severe schedule in your manual is normally often enough. 45K. Personally, I do a partial every 25K. Color is a good indicator. Hazy is approaching the danger point. 

 

 

6 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

All of the concerns would be eliminated if you change the fluid IMO. Short cold trips, switch to a 100% synthetic. Red Line?

If you use semi synthetic fluid, 25 k exchange? Using 100% synthetic, 40 -50 k?

Me and Grumpy have preached more fluid changes are good. Has worked for me for along time. 

Thanks for the info guys. I have done the pill flip and on back roads my transmission fluid temperature reaches 126F whether its cold or hot out. I just wanted to make sure that 126F wasn't too cold.

 

I also changed my fluid and filter at 30,000 miles. I'm currently just shy of 36,000. I plan on changing my transmission fluid and filter every 30,000 miles.

  • Like 2
Posted
46 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

 

That's cooler than I would have thought. Think I saw 104 F as a 'trigger' in a tuning table 1SLOW1500 showed once. 

 

Unlike the motor 'moisture' is not generated in a transmission as a combustion byproduct. It's absorbed from the atmosphere.  Here's a pretty good writeup from Machinery Lubrication on that topic. 

 

https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/192/water-contaminant-oil

 

Some moisture is present in ALL lubricating fluids. The object of the game is controlling/limiting the concentration levels.

 

The easiest and most effect way of controlling its concentration is by regular fluid exchange. Take a breath.... the severe schedule in your manual is normally often enough. 45K. Personally, I do a partial every 25K. Color is a good indicator. Hazy is approaching the danger point. 

 

 

 

Good stuff Grumpy.

 

In all honesty, I was just spit balling a #.  

  • Like 1
Posted
On 11/6/2021 at 6:48 PM, M1ck3y said:

This makes absolutely zero sense. I mean that gm is doing this now...

they use this thermostat in all the trannies, with the old thermostat design GM was getting hammered with warrantee claims. trans failing to early 40,000-70,000 miles, this lower temp upgrade will fix that

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, pokismoki said:

they use this thermostat in all the trannies, with the old thermostat design GM was getting hammered with warrantee claims. trans failing to early 40,000-70,000 miles, this lower temp upgrade will fix that

 

 

 

 

Thanks Poki, but yes I'm aware of the problems.

 

What I'm trying to comprehend is why would gm fix this now. The 6 speed is no longer produced, current vehicles are out of warranty or will be out warranty soon.

 

They've obviously known it was a problem from the start. Or rather, I hope they have. Because the alternative means the internet knows gm's products better than they do themselves.

 

If anything this just provides fuel for someone looking at persuing a lawsuit. 

 

Hence, this makes no sense...

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, M1ck3y said:

 

Thanks Poki, but yes I'm aware of the problems.

 

What I'm trying to comprehend is why would gm fix this now. The 6 speed is no longer produced, current vehicles are out of warranty or will be out warranty soon.

 

They've obviously known it was a problem from the start. Or rather, I hope they have. Because the alternative means the internet knows gm's products better than they do themselves.

 

If anything this just provides fuel for someone looking at persuing a lawsuit. 

 

Hence, this makes no sense...

It's a good question and one we may never know the answer to.

Posted
4 hours ago, M1ck3y said:

 

Thanks Poki, but yes I'm aware of the problems.

 

What I'm trying to comprehend is why would gm fix this now. The 6 speed is no longer produced, current vehicles are out of warranty or will be out warranty soon.

 

They've obviously known it was a problem from the start. Or rather, I hope they have. Because the alternative means the internet knows gm's products better than they do themselves.

 

If anything this just provides fuel for someone looking at persuing a lawsuit. 

 

Hence, this makes no sense...

GM still uses that thermostat in the late model trannies, same part  with lower temp, is a direct fit for the 6 speed i have to guess.

you cant persue a lawsuit , judge will throw it out of court. That high temp is part of improving fuel consumption, and that's mandated by EPA and the Feds.

Posted
28 minutes ago, pokismoki said:

GM still uses that thermostat in the late model trannies, same part  with lower temp, is a direct fit for the 6 speed i have to guess.

you cant persue a lawsuit , judge will throw it out of court. That high temp is part of improving fuel consumption, and that's mandated by EPA and the Feds.

 

Yes, the 6l80 is the late model trans in the tsb.

 

EPA requirements are irrelevant concerning warranty and/or denied warranty. GM failed to recognize a fault with their product, or they did know and failed to correct it. Until now..

 

It just pisses me off the way big corporation's operate. They can and do get away with anything, or at least until someone with a bigger wig comes along. Then its just a pissing contest between a whole bunch of big wigs. Millions thrown away in court battle's, instead of someone doing the right thing and taking responsibility. It's all about money how much it costs to get away with it and how it make's them look as a company. 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, newdude said:

 

 

Good stuff Grumpy.

 

In all honesty, I was just spit balling a #.  

 

Then I wouldn't want to play darts with you if you get that close winging it! :crackup:

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Haha 1
Posted

Remember the Pinto gas tank? They knew it was a poor design. Paid all the fines and still made millions on that car. You have to accept the fact that the public is no more than a source of revenue for every business and branch of government.

We are a wallet and everyone wants to get in it.  

Then add the lawyers. The deck is stacked against us.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, M1ck3y said:

It just pisses me off the way big corporation's operate. They can and do get away with anything, or at least until someone with a bigger wig comes along. Then its just a pissing contest between a whole bunch of big wigs. Millions thrown away in court battle's, instead of someone doing the right thing and taking responsibility. It's all about money how much it costs to get away with it and how it make's them look as a company.

 

30 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

Remember the Pinto gas tank? They knew it was a poor design. Paid all the fines and still made millions on that car. You have to accept the fact that the public is no more than a source of revenue for every business and branch of government.

We are a wallet and everyone wants to get in it.  

Then add the lawyers. The deck is stacked against us.

 

 

Received a recall notice for the A pillar air bag telling me it's faulty and could KILL me. Then told me that they haven't any parts for the fix and they will get back to me when they do.............

 

No mention the owner should park it. That they will supply a loaner or rental until it's fixed. To come in and have it disabled.

 

Just a ''Get out of Jail" notice that takes them off the hook for my death until they get 'around to it'. 

 

I put it in the file where things like, 'Picking up a nail in your tire may cause a flat that leads to loss of control and fatality' file. Right next to "Driving on roads with idiots speeding and reading their phone may kill you!" file. 

 

They removed hood ornaments they may flail the flesh from your body when the two ton vehicle that hit you didn't finish you off then load a gun and point it at your head and say. "Caution, we've pointed a loaded gun at your head". 

 

:wtf:

 

It isn't love for fellow man commerce is full of now is it?

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2018 Silverado Custom with 156k on the odometer. In the last month I've replaced the plugs, wires and the driver side engine mount. My wife just returned from a trip of about 1500 miles and told me the brakes are making a grinding noise when applied. I drove it and looked it over and this is what I found with the driver's side rear rotor.   I'm going to order new pads and check about having the rotor resurfaced. Hopefully this is easier than the last 2 jobs.   Peace  
    • Any update if the new valve cover help with the oil consumption?  I have a 2014 GMC sierra and my truck is consuming a lot of oil so I’m wondering if replacing the driver side valve cover will stop some of the oil consumption. Thanks 
    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...