Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There have been threads on here before regarding the use of regular vs premium gas in the 6.2L.  I used to always use premium in my 2020 Denali.  Recently the spread between them has reached $0.80 in my area so it isn't just a couple dollars more on a fill up now.

 

I started using regular and really don't notice a big difference in performance.  I haven't tried to figure out the difference in mileage yet.  Has anyone done that?

Posted (edited)

I have never put anything other than L87 in my tank and have never had any pinging. My mileage seems to be on par, too. I get about 19 on the freeway. Chevy recommends that I use premium, but I recommend that I don't.

Edited by reeseb
  • Haha 3
Posted

Did this a few years back during the winter. I noticed the mpg went down. If I remember correctly it was down about 1 to 1.5 mpg. 

Posted

I use premium gas in mine since I leave it parked for weeks. I don't think I've filled up in three months.

Posted

I have never used anything but 87 octane in my 2020 High Country HD with the 6.6L and my new 2022 Denali with the 6.2L.Never had a single issue and I dont expect any.

 

The reason is performance. The PCM is programmed with Low octane tables and high octane tables both. It will move to the low octane tables based on the ping ( KR ). The Low Tables are designed for 87. Yes, you will  have a slight performance lost, but unless you are heavy towing or drag racing it, then the Low Octane tables will handle your drive with no issues. 

Posted

You knuckleheads running 87 in your 6.2s let us know when you sell your truck so we can avoid it.  Broken rings and pistons are in the motor's future.

 

Y'all ought to get the motor you can afford.  As for me and my house, we will always burn E85 or 93 in our FlexFuel vehicles regardless of price.  God provides for our needs.

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, swathdiver said:

You knuckleheads running 87 in your 6.2s let us know when you sell your truck so we can avoid it.  Broken rings and pistons are in the motor's future.

 

Y'all ought to get the motor you can afford.  As for me and my house, we will always burn E85 or 93 in our FlexFuel vehicles regardless of price.  God provides for our needs.

They will not. Ever heard of knock sensor? Are you WOT at every chance? Towing? If not, then nothing will happen. Also, I assure I can afford 20 dollar a gallon gas if I wanted. That doesn't mean I will blatantly piss away 10 bucks a fill up if I'm not towing or drag racing my truck. But please, tell us all how you know more than everyone else. 

Edited by 1454
  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Posted
8 hours ago, zelmo said:

There have been threads on here before regarding the use of regular vs premium gas in the 6.2L.  I used to always use premium in my 2020 Denali.  Recently the spread between them has reached $0.80 in my area so it isn't just a couple dollars more on a fill up now.

 

I started using regular and really don't notice a big difference in performance.  I haven't tried to figure out the difference in mileage yet.  Has anyone done that?

I put 20k on my truck driving back and forth to Jersey from NC last year and saw between 20.5 and 21.5 regardless of 87 or 93. The only thing that gave me actual more mileage was using non ethanol fuel. Which inherently makes sense because ethanol is less energy dense.  88 gave a solid 22 mpg every trip. 

  • Sad 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, 1454 said:

They will not. Ever heard of knock sensor? Are you WOT at every chance? Towing? If not, then nothing will happen. Also, I assure I can afford 20 dollar a gallon gas if I wanted. That doesn't mean I will blatantly piss away 10 bucks a fill up if I'm not towing or drag racing my truck. But please, tell us all how you know more than everyone else. 

 

They do, it is not speculation, those of us who pay attention have witnessed it.

 

Your high compression engines knock/ping while driving around town on that 87 swill.  You cannot hear it.  You take off from a light, the motor knocks and the computer pulls timing.  You go to pass a guy, even without downshifting, the motor knocks and the computer pulls timing.  1000 more times on your trip to the mall and back.  You don't think that will take toll day after day, month after month, year after year?

 

I don't know more than everyone else, I paid attention and learned it here.  You can too if you do your research.

 

Last time at the drags I took a video from inside the cab, from the stands and took a Snapshot with my Tech-2 to show you guys that the motors do knock and you cannot always hear it.  I am not tech savvy enough put three videos into one but someday my kids might slow down and help me post it for y'all.

 

Myself and others have posted videos from youtube of 6.2s that came apart because of prolonged use of low octane gasoline.

  • Like 7
Posted

I went to tech school first for automotive technology, and then for a BSME. I didn't learn what I did from a message board. If you aren't under heavy load, cylinder pressures aren't enough to cause detonation. No manufacturer is going to sell a engine today that a slightly lower octane will cause them warranty work. But yes, you know more than everyone who has shown this isn't the case because someone posted a forum topic on "muh 87 causing detonation, omg."

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 2
Posted

last year I rent a Cadillac Escalade with 6.2 to go on a long trip and yes if you use 87 in that ****** she will knock , I have heard it knocking , those 6.2 do not like 87, 89 was much better but she love 91 and above.

  • Like 3
Posted

If it was going to damage the engine to use 87, then 91+ would be required vs recommended.

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, 1454 said:

I went to tech school first for automotive technology, and then for a BSME. I didn't learn what I did from a message board. If you aren't under heavy load, cylinder pressures aren't enough to cause detonation. No manufacturer is going to sell a engine today that a slightly lower octane will cause them warranty work. But yes, you know more than everyone who has shown this isn't the case because someone posted a forum topic on "muh 87 causing detonation, omg."

 

Well, you know so much that isn't so. 

 

Make sure you let us know when you sell your car so we can all avoid it.

Posted

https://pickuptrucktalk.com/2020/10/misleading-these-trucks-recommend-or-require-premium-fuel/#:~:text=GM recommends using 93 octane,economy you must use 93.

 

Recommends and Requires do not have the same meaning. 

 

Question! As GM's RECOMENDED 93 is not available everywhere in the USA does that mean those who live in areas without 93 can 't own a 6.2? :dunno:

 

Kiddo's my little much hatted by most 4.3 RECOMMENDS 87 octane and pulls up to 10 degrees KIR on every hill or major headwind. It's also a Flex Fuel vehicle and pulls zero KIR when using something over 40% ethanol and more interestingly does about 3% better that the carbon balance would indicate which speaks to GM's claims the RECOMMENDED USE of higher octane fuel will ENHANCE PERFORMANCE AND MILEAGE.

 

IF KIR knocked rings out of motors there would be heaps of dead 4.3's littering the highways. 

 

Does that mean others observations of damage are in error? 🤔 Absolutely not. Some knuckle heads think towing heavy on 87 is a good idea and they will suffer for that mistake. KIR will not pull an infinite amount of timing. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • If everything checks out at the MAF, then the MAF is BAD, new or not.   You don't need a signal generator to troubleshoot this. PCM needs ALL powers and ALL grounds able to light a halogen headlight bulb - if it can light the bulb bright, then the wiring is good enough to run the PCM.   Best thing you can do for yourself is spend some time here: scannerdanner.com - Check out all his YouTube videos on similar issues. If you decide to subscribe it's the best bang-for-buck ratio in the automotive world, hands-down. He's got TONS of free vids on YouTube, too.
    • Yes, I used my multimeter to probe all of the wires at the MAF, both with the sensor connected, sensor disconnected, key on engine off, key on engine running, etc etc etc. I probed all of the wires again at the PCM, at the connectors, etc. All voltages are what they should be according to the service manual/wiring diagrams. All grounds are good, less than 20 millivolts from the battery negative under load. Both at the connector of the MAF, at the PCM connector etc.      I know this throws a pretty big wrench into things, but this truck was acting up before the swap. I don't have very much information, if any on what was causing it, but if you cleared all of the dtcs it would do the same thing where it would crank, fire, then die. And it would do the same thing a dozen or so times, and eventually it would start and run, but the difference is that it would run and actually be drivable. Whereas now if you can drive it at all, it goes into reduced power mode almost immediately, and even then it's not running correctly. When you come to a stop at a light it stumbles down to for 500 RPM before catching itself and returning to the smooth idle. And if you go more than about 50% throttle then it immediately goes back to doing the misfire thing.    Like I said, I know that throws a wrench into things, and unfortunately I was not able to pull any data or anything like that before I did this work, so I don't have much to go on.    I'm trying to not fixate on one particular thing as the cause of the problem, but it seems like all avenues are pointing me towards the PCM. Like I said I have tested the wiring extensively (see above), and during cranking the sensor does produce seemingly legitimate values at least according to my multimeter, but as soon as the engine fires those values quickly descend into gibberish. I've tried it with multiple different known working sensors, I have done literally every test I can think of multiple times on the wiring (probing the signals, probing the pins with the sensors unplugged, probing the pins at the PCM, voltage drop, voltage drop under load, continuity, ohms, and double-checking everything against the wiring diagrams/ proper values in the service data.)    Another thing that pushes me towards a possible PCM failure is, I have noticed in troubleshooting a little bit taking a break and coming back, that when I leave the truck to sit for a while and cool off, it starts and runs smoothly when I first start it up. However once it warms up. It starts having problems. For example, when I went out to the truck this morning after it had been sitting overnight, I was actually able to drive it down the block. And then once I got on the throttle a Little bit after going about a thousand ft, it started misfiring again. I pulled it back into the driveway, shut it down, and started it back up. It idled smoothly. As soon as I touched the throttle it did the misfire thing again. From then on as soon as I started it it would misfire. I shut the truck off and went to go get a coffee and do a bit more research. When I came back out I started the truck up and it immediately went into the smooth idle. After a couple of minutes of playing around with it, it would not idle smoothly anymore. Let it sit a couple of hours, rinse and repeat. This makes me think with temperature change something is going wrong inside the PCM. I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle and I'm thinking of getting a one-day subscription to the ACDelco programming service to try and program that and see if it helps.   Like I said, I'm really trying to not fixate myself on one potential cause, but it seems everything is pointing me towards PCM failure. I would really like to try to confirm that, but unfortunately I don't have an oscilloscope or a signal generator to do the GM service procedure where you feed 5 khz into the signal pin. 
    • Ahh, sorry about that - I got some bad info. Newdude is correct. That's what I get for working 13 hours straight ... on my "vacation", lol.   Should've checked the files I had instead of the internet.   Anyway ... this is GREAT news, since this would've been an absolute friggin nightmare to get working.   I don't think the lack of VVT is causing this - you've got another issue. Wiring, I'm betting.   I'm telling you right now, your computer isn't bad. If it worked before the swap, it's working now. You need to do some more (better) diagnostics and figure out exactly what you're missing. Did you test every wire directly at the MAF? Have 5V reference? Ground? If you're reading ZERO g/s, your Hz isn't much use - it's going to be the wrong value anyway. The MAF is not working, and you need to find out WHY.   I got this off the net, so VERIFY first: Pin A: Black (BLK) wire, Circuit 552, serves as the Sensor Return (Ground).  Pin B: Tan (TAN) wire, Circuit 472, carries the Intake Air Temperature (IAT) signal.  Pin C: Yellow (YEL) wire, Circuit 492, is the primary MAF Sensor Signal output to the PCM. Pin D: Pink (PNK) wire, Circuit 339 or 539, provides Ignition 1 Voltage (Power).  Pin E: Tan/Black wire, Circuit 552 or similar, often associated with the Intake Air Temperature ground or signal return.  Global-A list: https://postimg.cc/KKJnQC85    
    • Correct....the end user can't reach to Realtruck directly like they can if they purchase a Bak, Undercover, etc...  It has to go through a dealer.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...