Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There have been threads on here before regarding the use of regular vs premium gas in the 6.2L.  I used to always use premium in my 2020 Denali.  Recently the spread between them has reached $0.80 in my area so it isn't just a couple dollars more on a fill up now.

 

I started using regular and really don't notice a big difference in performance.  I haven't tried to figure out the difference in mileage yet.  Has anyone done that?

Posted (edited)

I have never put anything other than L87 in my tank and have never had any pinging. My mileage seems to be on par, too. I get about 19 on the freeway. Chevy recommends that I use premium, but I recommend that I don't.

Edited by reeseb
  • Haha 3
Posted

Did this a few years back during the winter. I noticed the mpg went down. If I remember correctly it was down about 1 to 1.5 mpg. 

Posted

I use premium gas in mine since I leave it parked for weeks. I don't think I've filled up in three months.

Posted

I have never used anything but 87 octane in my 2020 High Country HD with the 6.6L and my new 2022 Denali with the 6.2L.Never had a single issue and I dont expect any.

 

The reason is performance. The PCM is programmed with Low octane tables and high octane tables both. It will move to the low octane tables based on the ping ( KR ). The Low Tables are designed for 87. Yes, you will  have a slight performance lost, but unless you are heavy towing or drag racing it, then the Low Octane tables will handle your drive with no issues. 

Posted

You knuckleheads running 87 in your 6.2s let us know when you sell your truck so we can avoid it.  Broken rings and pistons are in the motor's future.

 

Y'all ought to get the motor you can afford.  As for me and my house, we will always burn E85 or 93 in our FlexFuel vehicles regardless of price.  God provides for our needs.

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, swathdiver said:

You knuckleheads running 87 in your 6.2s let us know when you sell your truck so we can avoid it.  Broken rings and pistons are in the motor's future.

 

Y'all ought to get the motor you can afford.  As for me and my house, we will always burn E85 or 93 in our FlexFuel vehicles regardless of price.  God provides for our needs.

They will not. Ever heard of knock sensor? Are you WOT at every chance? Towing? If not, then nothing will happen. Also, I assure I can afford 20 dollar a gallon gas if I wanted. That doesn't mean I will blatantly piss away 10 bucks a fill up if I'm not towing or drag racing my truck. But please, tell us all how you know more than everyone else. 

Edited by 1454
  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Posted
8 hours ago, zelmo said:

There have been threads on here before regarding the use of regular vs premium gas in the 6.2L.  I used to always use premium in my 2020 Denali.  Recently the spread between them has reached $0.80 in my area so it isn't just a couple dollars more on a fill up now.

 

I started using regular and really don't notice a big difference in performance.  I haven't tried to figure out the difference in mileage yet.  Has anyone done that?

I put 20k on my truck driving back and forth to Jersey from NC last year and saw between 20.5 and 21.5 regardless of 87 or 93. The only thing that gave me actual more mileage was using non ethanol fuel. Which inherently makes sense because ethanol is less energy dense.  88 gave a solid 22 mpg every trip. 

  • Sad 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, 1454 said:

They will not. Ever heard of knock sensor? Are you WOT at every chance? Towing? If not, then nothing will happen. Also, I assure I can afford 20 dollar a gallon gas if I wanted. That doesn't mean I will blatantly piss away 10 bucks a fill up if I'm not towing or drag racing my truck. But please, tell us all how you know more than everyone else. 

 

They do, it is not speculation, those of us who pay attention have witnessed it.

 

Your high compression engines knock/ping while driving around town on that 87 swill.  You cannot hear it.  You take off from a light, the motor knocks and the computer pulls timing.  You go to pass a guy, even without downshifting, the motor knocks and the computer pulls timing.  1000 more times on your trip to the mall and back.  You don't think that will take toll day after day, month after month, year after year?

 

I don't know more than everyone else, I paid attention and learned it here.  You can too if you do your research.

 

Last time at the drags I took a video from inside the cab, from the stands and took a Snapshot with my Tech-2 to show you guys that the motors do knock and you cannot always hear it.  I am not tech savvy enough put three videos into one but someday my kids might slow down and help me post it for y'all.

 

Myself and others have posted videos from youtube of 6.2s that came apart because of prolonged use of low octane gasoline.

  • Like 7
Posted

I went to tech school first for automotive technology, and then for a BSME. I didn't learn what I did from a message board. If you aren't under heavy load, cylinder pressures aren't enough to cause detonation. No manufacturer is going to sell a engine today that a slightly lower octane will cause them warranty work. But yes, you know more than everyone who has shown this isn't the case because someone posted a forum topic on "muh 87 causing detonation, omg."

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 2
Posted

last year I rent a Cadillac Escalade with 6.2 to go on a long trip and yes if you use 87 in that ****** she will knock , I have heard it knocking , those 6.2 do not like 87, 89 was much better but she love 91 and above.

  • Like 3
Posted

If it was going to damage the engine to use 87, then 91+ would be required vs recommended.

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, 1454 said:

I went to tech school first for automotive technology, and then for a BSME. I didn't learn what I did from a message board. If you aren't under heavy load, cylinder pressures aren't enough to cause detonation. No manufacturer is going to sell a engine today that a slightly lower octane will cause them warranty work. But yes, you know more than everyone who has shown this isn't the case because someone posted a forum topic on "muh 87 causing detonation, omg."

 

Well, you know so much that isn't so. 

 

Make sure you let us know when you sell your car so we can all avoid it.

Posted

https://pickuptrucktalk.com/2020/10/misleading-these-trucks-recommend-or-require-premium-fuel/#:~:text=GM recommends using 93 octane,economy you must use 93.

 

Recommends and Requires do not have the same meaning. 

 

Question! As GM's RECOMENDED 93 is not available everywhere in the USA does that mean those who live in areas without 93 can 't own a 6.2? :dunno:

 

Kiddo's my little much hatted by most 4.3 RECOMMENDS 87 octane and pulls up to 10 degrees KIR on every hill or major headwind. It's also a Flex Fuel vehicle and pulls zero KIR when using something over 40% ethanol and more interestingly does about 3% better that the carbon balance would indicate which speaks to GM's claims the RECOMMENDED USE of higher octane fuel will ENHANCE PERFORMANCE AND MILEAGE.

 

IF KIR knocked rings out of motors there would be heaps of dead 4.3's littering the highways. 

 

Does that mean others observations of damage are in error? 🤔 Absolutely not. Some knuckle heads think towing heavy on 87 is a good idea and they will suffer for that mistake. KIR will not pull an infinite amount of timing. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,716
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    BDS my HD
    Newest Member
    BDS my HD
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 491 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hello hello looking forward to expanding my knowledge of the 2026 2500 HD that I just bought.   Truck has 3500 miles on it four-wheel-drive crew cab and I’m about to put a 6 1/2 inch BDS lift on it 18 x 10 -25 offset with 37’s   Already have the wheels and tires just waiting on the lift install in about three weeks   Question what surprises am I not gonna be happy with?  I’m not new to lifted trucks so I know that acceleration towing gas mileage all that is affected..   Question is those of you that have this truck this powertrain with a 10 speed Allison and have done the mods that I’m doing,,, how bad is it? Is that Allison constantly gonna be hunting for the right gear to go into? And what about towing, acceleration, fuel consumption as mentioned?    Lastly how come I can’t find any ring pinion gear set up for these axles and when could I expect to see them?   I apologize if there’s any typos I’m doing speech to text on my iPhone.    
    • I've got a 2013 2500 6.0L Flexfuel. Drove the truck earlier today with no issues. Went to run an errand tonight and noticed key fob wouldn't work. Figured battery was dead, so replaced fob batter. Still wasn't working. Grabbed my other set of keys with the other fob and that one wasn't working either. So I manually unlock truck and insert key. Interior lights come on, dashboard lights up, turn key and truck starts. Turn truck off, like a moron, and try starting again. This time no crank, no click, no nothing. Lights still come on and dash lights up, but now I'm getting a service 4wheel drive, service tire monitor, etc. Check voltage on battery and Im showing 12.2v. Throw my battery charger on it and give it 15 mins and try starting again. But still no crank no start. Decide maybe its a bad battery, run to autozone grab a new one and put it in. Same issue. Disconnect battery and let it sit for 15 mins. Try again and still nothing. I had managed to roll the windows down earlier as its a humid night, but now I can't get them to roll up. Power locks are also not working now. Then randomly I try the key again, and it fires right up. Immediately I roll up the windows as we have nothing but rain forecast this week. I shut it back off wait 30 seconds and start up again. Worked a 2nd time. So turn it off, start putting things back together. Try one more time, and back to no crank no start. And now the car alarm starts going off. Had to disconnect battery and leave it that way for the night as I don't think my neighbors would appreciate my alarm going off again tonight. Any thoughts or help would be appreciated. 
    • No one will care for you like you care for you. Do what you can for as long as you can. IMHO of course. 
    • How about them NICKS!!! 
    • Hi there.  Long time lurker, first post.    i have read the previous posts regarding the water ingress problem with this emblem.  I bought my 1500 SLT the  summer of 2025 new and after reading the MANY problems with these emblems failing I decided to install one anyways.  As per a YouTube video, I sealed ( or tried to) this sign with silicone sealant around the outer perimeter joint and the holes that were already somewhat sealed on the rear plate of the emblem.  And installed the connector assembly using dielectric grease on the connectors. The installation looked great and worked well for about 4 months……then FAILURE.  Grrrrrr…… I live in the great white north and wash my truck weekly in an automatic car wash  to keep the salt off.  Let me tell you that removing the old, failed emblem is a whole different animal than removing the OEM individual letters without removing the grill assembly. Mainly because the illuminated logo is built differently than the original letters which  you can remove the red surface lettering with a knife or some kind of blade which gives access to the tabs which hold the logo onto the grill. So I had to essentially destroyed the old emblem to remove it. Doing so killed my chance of doing somekind of autopsy on the failed , old logo.  But there was plenty of water inside when I ripped it apart.  Prior to installing the new assembly I tried it with the old harness and it works fine.   Does anyone have any insight as to where the water is getting into this emblem? I intend to seal the new logo with slow curing epoxy this time around using a syringe.  I think this newer emblem may be an updated unit which I hope GM got the vendor to fix. It has an October 2025 date on it.    If this one  fails,  I am just going to revert back to the non-illuminated letters….AFTER PULLING THE GRILL.    Any thoughts on sealing with epoxy would be appreciated. Thx!   Doug  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...