Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’ve already prepared myself for at least 6-8 weeks to get shipped.  If it comes in before then, great.  But I would bet it will be summer before I see it.  Shouldn’t be this way but seems like everything we get now days takes longer than it should.  

Posted
2 hours ago, Another JR said:

Also, this good news - it means Jettech’s new truck will come relatively fast once he orders it!

Thick as thieves I see you and @Pryme are.  

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

So remember when so many ppl didn’t like the front of the 2020+ Chevy?

 

can anyone honestly say this Ford front looks better? I’ll use my truck since it’s also a black bumper and grill white base truck. 
 

 

C49062F5-5C87-4C00-A63B-BAE3E11C1DB5.jpeg

6A307A9A-D520-4328-9B77-74BBE94DE962.jpeg

Edited by Pryme
Posted
3 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Only recently took a good look at the WT looks. To me it’s the best lookin trim

 

 

You are correct there.  I couldn't find one to save my life last summer but I was able to find the next best thing and that's the Custom model.  But I do agree with you.  I love the simplicity and just all around rugged look of them.

  • Like 1
Posted

I do like the WT trims as well especially if you put some black aftermarket wheels and a flatbed on them.  But I guess I’m spoiled and want a few more of the creature comforts in the higher trims on my daily driver.  If I ever get rid of my 15 I will probably just go with a WT/Pro next time because it will be solely for work and not my daily driver.  

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Well I got the new AT4 last weekend.  Been so busy this week didn't even have a chance to drive it much.  Basically drove it home from the dealership and parked it all week.  We had some stormy weather and I didn't want to take the chance of getting damage the first week!  I liked the 2023 and had zero issues with it (14,****** miles) but I will tell you this 2024 is the nicest vehicle I've ever owned.  It's everything and then some what I read.  The interior in the 23 was fine.  The 24 is just a step change.  Just like when I went from an 08 LMM to my 2015 LML.  I thought at the time I'd never own a nicer pickup.  Still love the 15 and will keep it, but the 24 is way more refined.  Literally to the point it's honestly too much tech and creature comforts.  I've never felt like I couldn't take a pickup off road to work in, but I'm contemplating this one.  Probably good they kept the Pro with older interior for those situations where guys need more of a work truck.

 

  I'll give some quick thoughts after only 250 miles of driving:

 

Pro's:

Interior is amzaing!

10 speed is for real.  I cannot wait to hook up to a trailer.  The transmission grade brakes like my LML.  Buttery smooth and seems to be in the right gear.  The transmission is "somewhat" busy but I never really notice it.  Never saw the trans temp go over 165.

Exterior is the best looking pickup on the market bar none.  The new Ford is ugly as sin in my opinion.

Technology is out of the world

Fuel mileage seems to be up a tick from the 6 speed.  Averaged 17 on the trip home (65-70 mph).  It took my 23 about 10K miles to break in so I expect this one could hit 18 highway in time.  To me that's amazing.

Cameras are amazing.  Can see everything crystal clear.  There is even a washer on the front camera!

 

Con's 

This thing sits up high.  Maybe it's because of the 20" wheels but I"m 6'4 and I almost need steps to get in.  My wife almost had to use a step ladder and she's 5'7.  First thing need to do is get some steps installed!

I sort of like where they put the trailer brake control but the light and 4wd switch on the left hand side are in blind spots.  I don't like that at all.  Honsetly can't even see them.  GM should have put a little more thought into positioning.

Already have one strange noise coming from behind the dash.  Almost like a faint fan noise.  Gonna take it back next weekend to the dealer but that's always the fear with a new model comes out.  

 

Honestly there isn't much to dislike with this one (other than the price).  As I get a few more miles on it towing I'll update but I can guarantee already it will be better.  This transmission is going to be a game changer.  Really no reason to go diesel now unless towing all the time or in the mountains.  I'm in flat country.  The 6 speed was fine for me, this will be better.  I think GM is gonna pick up some market share with this refresh.  

 

If you are on the fence about upgrading I would take a hard look.  Only 250 miles so time will tell but I am very pleased so far.  

 

 

 

IMG-2060 (1).jpg

IMG-2061.jpg

Posted
10 minutes ago, Doodle said:

Well I got the new AT4 last weekend.  Been so busy this week didn't even have a chance to drive it much.  Basically drove it home from the dealership and parked it all week.  We had some stormy weather and I didn't want to take the chance of getting damage the first week!  I liked the 2023 and had zero issues with it (14,****** miles) but I will tell you this 2024 is the nicest vehicle I've ever owned.  It's everything and then some what I read.  The interior in the 23 was fine.  The 24 is just a step change.  Just like when I went from an 08 LMM to my 2015 LML.  I thought at the time I'd never own a nicer pickup.  Still love the 15 and will keep it, but the 24 is way more refined.  Literally to the point it's honestly too much tech and creature comforts.  I've never felt like I couldn't take a pickup off road to work in, but I'm contemplating this one.  Probably good they kept the Pro with older interior for those situations where guys need more of a work truck.

 

  I'll give some quick thoughts after only 250 miles of driving:

 

Pro's:

Interior is amzaing!

10 speed is for real.  I cannot wait to hook up to a trailer.  The transmission grade brakes like my LML.  Buttery smooth and seems to be in the right gear.  The transmission is "somewhat" busy but I never really notice it.  Never saw the trans temp go over 165.

Exterior is the best looking pickup on the market bar none.  The new Ford is ugly as sin in my opinion.

Technology is out of the world

Fuel mileage seems to be up a tick from the 6 speed.  Averaged 17 on the trip home (65-70 mph).  It took my 23 about 10K miles to break in so I expect this one could hit 18 highway in time.  To me that's amazing.

Cameras are amazing.  Can see everything crystal clear.  There is even a washer on the front camera!

 

Con's 

This thing sits up high.  Maybe it's because of the 20" wheels but I"m 6'4 and I almost need steps to get in.  My wife almost had to use a step ladder and she's 5'7.  First thing need to do is get some steps installed!

I sort of like where they put the trailer brake control but the light and 4wd switch on the left hand side are in blind spots.  I don't like that at all.  Honsetly can't even see them.  GM should have put a little more thought into positioning.

Already have one strange noise coming from behind the dash.  Almost like a faint fan noise.  Gonna take it back next weekend to the dealer but that's always the fear with a new model comes out.  

 

Honestly there isn't much to dislike with this one (other than the price).  As I get a few more miles on it towing I'll update but I can guarantee already it will be better.  This transmission is going to be a game changer.  Really no reason to go diesel now unless towing all the time or in the mountains.  I'm in flat country.  The 6 speed was fine for me, this will be better.  I think GM is gonna pick up some market share with this refresh.  

 

If you are on the fence about upgrading I would take a hard look.  Only 250 miles so time will tell but I am very pleased so far.  

 

 

 

IMG-2060 (1).jpg

IMG-2061.jpg

You suck!!!  You are not helping me but you are helping all the others out there that are on my ass to get a 24 model because of well, because.....of that huge infotainment center and the 10 speed that I know I will love so much....I just unfriended you...take that!!!!  

Posted
26 minutes ago, Doodle said:

Well I got the new AT4 last weekend.  Been so busy this week didn't even have a chance to drive it much.  Basically drove it home from the dealership and parked it all week.  We had some stormy weather and I didn't want to take the chance of getting damage the first week!  I liked the 2023 and had zero issues with it (14,****** miles) but I will tell you this 2024 is the nicest vehicle I've ever owned.  It's everything and then some what I read.  The interior in the 23 was fine.  The 24 is just a step change.  Just like when I went from an 08 LMM to my 2015 LML.  I thought at the time I'd never own a nicer pickup.  Still love the 15 and will keep it, but the 24 is way more refined.  Literally to the point it's honestly too much tech and creature comforts.  I've never felt like I couldn't take a pickup off road to work in, but I'm contemplating this one.  Probably good they kept the Pro with older interior for those situations where guys need more of a work truck.

 

  I'll give some quick thoughts after only 250 miles of driving:

 

Pro's:

Interior is amzaing!

10 speed is for real.  I cannot wait to hook up to a trailer.  The transmission grade brakes like my LML.  Buttery smooth and seems to be in the right gear.  The transmission is "somewhat" busy but I never really notice it.  Never saw the trans temp go over 165.

Exterior is the best looking pickup on the market bar none.  The new Ford is ugly as sin in my opinion.

Technology is out of the world

Fuel mileage seems to be up a tick from the 6 speed.  Averaged 17 on the trip home (65-70 mph).  It took my 23 about 10K miles to break in so I expect this one could hit 18 highway in time.  To me that's amazing.

Cameras are amazing.  Can see everything crystal clear.  There is even a washer on the front camera!

 

Con's 

This thing sits up high.  Maybe it's because of the 20" wheels but I"m 6'4 and I almost need steps to get in.  My wife almost had to use a step ladder and she's 5'7.  First thing need to do is get some steps installed!

I sort of like where they put the trailer brake control but the light and 4wd switch on the left hand side are in blind spots.  I don't like that at all.  Honsetly can't even see them.  GM should have put a little more thought into positioning.

Already have one strange noise coming from behind the dash.  Almost like a faint fan noise.  Gonna take it back next weekend to the dealer but that's always the fear with a new model comes out.  

 

Honestly there isn't much to dislike with this one (other than the price).  As I get a few more miles on it towing I'll update but I can guarantee already it will be better.  This transmission is going to be a game changer.  Really no reason to go diesel now unless towing all the time or in the mountains.  I'm in flat country.  The 6 speed was fine for me, this will be better.  I think GM is gonna pick up some market share with this refresh.  

 

If you are on the fence about upgrading I would take a hard look.  Only 250 miles so time will tell but I am very pleased so far.  

 

 

 

IMG-2060 (1).jpg

IMG-2061.jpg

She’s a beaut, Clark. 
 

the one thing I don’t like on the 24’s is the light and 4wd switches both down low and next to each other, like you said. I like them up high where they are on our old lumber wagon 20-23 trucks ha

Posted

@Doodle beautiful truck! I have the same fan-like noise behind the dash. I've noticed only when the ac is on. I had it in my 21 GMC as well?

 

Also, have you noticed the allison transmission has a little whine to it? Lmk what the dealer says on your fan noise. I just turned 1k miles on the odometer so I'm changing the oil this weekend and towing next weekend. 

 

 

 

 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Jettech1 said:

You suck!!!  You are not helping me but you are helping all the others out there that are on my ass to get a 24 model because of well, because.....of that huge infotainment center and the 10 speed that I know I will love so much....I just unfriended you...take that!!!!  

Ha ha.  Again nothing wrong with the 23 at all.  My issue all along was I had ordered a 22 AT4 in July of 21 and it never got picked up.  Knew the refresh was coming and decided I would wait.  However, needed to put a pickup on service for my business so bought the 23 knowing it wouldn't keep it too long.  No way would have thought it would show up this fast.  We'll see how the 24 does and I'll update when I can.   

  • Like 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Pryme said:

She’s a beaut, Clark. 
 

the one thing I don’t like on the 24’s is the light and 4wd switches both down low and next to each other, like you said. I like them up high where they are on our old lumber wagon 20-23 trucks ha

The light switch you literally cannot see at all because the steering wheel blocks it. I realize they are auto lights but it's a dumb place to put it regardless. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, the8rotor said:

@Doodle beautiful truck! I have the same fan-like noise behind the dash. I've noticed only when the ac is on. I had it in my 21 GMC as well?

 

Also, have you noticed the allison transmission has a little whine to it? Lmk what the dealer says on your fan noise. I just turned 1k miles on the odometer so I'm changing the oil this weekend and towing next weekend. 

 

 

 

 

Best way I can explain it is it's like when the fan speed in on low and you have the vents shut off.  Like a restricted vent sound.  Faint, but it's there.  Here's the super weird part.  I only hear it at idle and as soon as I hit the throttle it goes away.  I think that's why I never noticed it when I drove it home from the dealer.  

Posted (edited)
On 5/19/2023 at 9:22 PM, Doodle said:

Already have one strange noise coming from behind the dash.  Almost like a faint fan noise.  Gonna take it back next weekend to the dealer but that's always the fear with a new model comes out.  

So I picked mine up on Friday (HC 3500 Gas).  The one thing that is bothering me, more than not having a diesel..lol, is the noise I hear when the A/C is running.  Might be the same sound you're referring to.  If I turn off the A/C, noise goes away.  I chalked it up to I can hear more things now that I don't have a diesel but perhaps there is something more to it.

 

As far as the rest of the truck, so far so good.  Not diesel power but I'm good with it, transmission shifts smoothly and I didn't notice any 'hunting' whatsoever.

 

I'll need to drive it some more to really nail down a comparison to the diesel and formulate an opinion..The A/C noise is ANNOYING though.

 

Aftermarket wheels/tires going on today!

Edited by CRApex

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
    • It was all part of the tiny bit of fuel savings it goes towards what was mandated by the government. Much like cylinder deactivation. That was relaxed by the recent administration. All that doesn’t help the individual buyer. But as a whole helps the manufacturer to try to reach the previous ridiculous past mileage per gallon mandate. So yes it was mandated and added cost to the vehicle. 
    • You do realize that auto stop/start...was never mandated by the fed...right?     EPA Says It's 'Killing' Stop-Start, and Here's What Automakers Have to Say   "Start‑stop technology has never been federally mandated, and the EPA’s recent action removes regulatory incentives associated with it rather than prohibiting its use."
    • Anytime the government mandates something, you can bet on it being absolutely senseless.
    • just logged my best MPG for one leg this am - drove home from the Denver Airport, 45 min drive - all freeway, lots of traffic so speeds were limited and some stop and go, got 17.7 for the ~30 mile trip.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...