Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Drove to base & got my VA claim started.

Only 18-36 months to go
Posted

Wife assaulted my truck today

 

Told her I am buying a new one. She didn't say a word

 

842c7b9f44866e9deb95689e14a0e554.jpg

 

Her van didn't fair as well good section of paint missing by her tail light. I was like wtf I parked further to the right Sr. Had plenty of room I could have landed a plane with the room I left.

 

 

Ryan

  • Like 2
Posted

Surprised that's all that happened. I tapped a tiny little sapling on my property with my rear bumper, and nearly totaled the truck. Cost me $2,200 to fix. Truck was only 2 years old at the time. :sick:

Posted (edited)

Wow..... it's all I can say. Cleaned up my 2015 Tundra which I am more fond of now but definitely was done with until I found out you can disable the traction control in them with the dash button to the level of a 1980's truck lol. Anyhow I test drove a 2016 F150 XLT double cab with the 2.7 Ecoboost and the little bugger impressed me...... honestly feels quicker than the Tundra..... not anywhere near my 6.2 Silverado but that's expected. Still a nice truck.... so I decided to see what Ford would do.

 

Their offer on the Tundra was nothing I didn't expect but the new Fords...... yeah no. I can buy a 5.3 powered loaded LTZ double cab Silverado for what Ford wants for a nicely appointed cloth seat double cab XLT..... and that's no crazy options on the Ford either. I mean just a 302A double cab with the console, bedliner, trailer package and the 2.7 Eco with 3.73's..... that stickers for between the 54000 and 56000....... they are nuts! Yes I am in Canada of course here but my loaded 2015 double cab 6.2 Silverado was $58500..... a 5.3 version of the same truck is easily mid 50's msrp..... Ford can take their trucks and shove them far up their asses lol. They wanted a $10K difference to my double cab TRD SR5 Yota.... I I just laughed..... You want $10K and to totally downgrade me...... good luck. They didn't seem at all shocked when I mentioned that their prices are absurd..... probably hear it a lot. There are diddly for the 2015 and 2016 F150's out and about here versus the GM twins or Rams and now I see why lol.

Edited by 1994Vmax
Posted

Can't wait to see how those little engines hold up in 15 years ...

Posted (edited)

Can't wait to see how those little engines hold up in 15 years ...

Probably about as good a this AFM junk does.... can't be any worse lol. It's not like turboed v6s are anything new... They should last forever for what they want for them... a Tundra which I always thought was an overpriced pos (I own one so I can say this) seems like a bargain compared to a Ford.. and at least with Toyota's out of date truck you know it won't blow up on you lol.

 

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Edited by 1994Vmax
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Bryce canyon again today.

summer-bryce-canyon-800x600.jpg

Nice! I loved the badlands, will check that out next time I head that way. I'll dig up the pic with my Olds Intrigue in it. Edited by SnakeEyes
Posted

 

748b5055c02dda625eea61dd8a74afcf.jpg Finally going to start on my cab corners I get the entire shop to my self this weekend to get it done got the box off and started cutting off the rust by supper tomorrow night I should have the new cab corners butt welded into place.

  • Like 1
Posted

Dawn at Bryce Canyon National Park.

20160520_062416_zpsrt6udmfb.jpg?w=480&h=

Then just east of park

20160520_121156_zpsthmgefoa.jpg?w=480&h=

Devils Garden south of Escalante down brutal Hole in the Rock Road

20160520_152727_zps7doby7hz.jpg?w=480&h=

Dusk with Full Moon at Capital Coral National Park

20160520_204524_zpsz722whxv.jpg?w=480&h=

  • Like 2
Posted

a Tundra which I always thought was an overpriced pos (I own one so I can say this) seems like a bargain compared to a Ford.. and at least with Toyota's out of date truck you know it won't blow up on you lol.

 

No guarantees on that... but most of em don't really get used as real truck though..

 

Posted (edited)

 

No guarantees on that... but most of em don't really get used as real truck though..

 

Lol... compared to what exactly? Because neither do most GM's.... your carpeted wheel well liners and paint that falls off at the thought of a rock are living proof of that. For work I take my Tundra over my Chev any day of the week... and I actually do.

 

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Edited by 1994Vmax
Posted (edited)

Just got home from Santa Clarita. Had a drink with one of the site mods. According to the DIC, managed 17.3 MPG on the 160 mile round trip

Edited by Chris
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...