Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Started buying Denali parts again. Got the lower grille in. Still need to mess with the frame and I'm going to replace the core support. Still trying to find the best price on the core support and other pieces. I got the lower grill on amazon. Got the last one and it was discounted from $115 down to $27. It is the actual GM part as well

Posted

I know they used somewhat of a different engine on the 14's and up,
I've had this truck almost a month now, its due for an oil change.
I got 3 free oil changes they use at the dealer, I think they said AC-Delco semi blend?
The owner before said, he put Castrol Synthetic in it, but I'm thinking I'm just gonna use Amsoil SS in it with their filter and change every 8-10k.

Since it had 40k miles. Ran Royal Purple before that since it had 2,291 on the clock. Always changed that at 5k miles or sooner. Alot sooner than it needed to be, that's for sure.

 

 

Couldn't do any better maintenance. Treated this one the same, if not better, than my old school 350s I've owned in the past, and this modern junk hasn't even come close to the miles (or the severe beatings) those engines had on them. I was in my teens and twenties in those days - the pedal spent most of it's time planted in the carpet! This truck was babied by comparison. It's a friggin disgrace! :mad:

 

GM has forgotten how to build an engine in order to save themselves some money. Maybe if they built the shit right the first go-around, there wouldn't be any money problems? HMMM! What a concept!! :eek:

 

 

 

 

Posted

I know they used somewhat of a different engine on the 14's and up,

I've had this truck almost a month now, its due for an oil change.

I got 3 free oil changes they use at the dealer, I think they said AC-Delco semi blend?

The owner before said, he put Castrol Synthetic in it, but I'm thinking I'm just gonna use Amsoil SS in it with their filter and change every 8-10k.

 

 

 

Amsoil SS is the best oil you can buy, hands down. IMO, semi-synthetic is a useless marketing gimmick. Has few of the benefits of full synthetic. It's basically a SLIGHTLY better dino oil.

 

Maybe you can get them to exchange the oil changes for 3 free car washes or something. :)

Posted

 

Amsoil SS is the best oil you can buy, hands down. IMO, semi-synthetic is a useless marketing gimmick. Has few of the benefits of full synthetic. It's basically a SLIGHTLY better dino oil.

 

Maybe you can get them to exchange the oil changes for 3 free car washes or something. :)

Well, they said I could buy my own oil and stuff. They'd change it for free. How often do you change your oil while running Amsoil SS?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

 

Amsoil SS is the best oil you can buy, hands down. IMO, semi-synthetic is a useless marketing gimmick. Has few of the benefits of full synthetic. It's basically a SLIGHTLY better dino oil.

 

Maybe you can get them to exchange the oil changes for 3 free car washes or something. :)

 

While I agree Amsoil is great oil, I don't know if I would say best oil hands down. The Schaeffer 9000 I run in my engine is some pretty damn good oil as well. Don't get me wrong, I run Amsoil products in my diffs and t-case.

Posted (edited)

I've seen the tests, and other's (along with my own) TBN in oil analysis'. I have yet to see anything better in that regard, but that's just one aspect - it accells across the board.

 

 

Well, they said I could buy my own oil and stuff. They'd change it for free. How often do you change your oil while running Amsoil SS?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Longest I've gone so far is 9,985 - and that is hard towing, and up here in the Northeast pretty much every drive is considered "city". The oil was ready to go many more miles, but my engine is shedding metals like crazy. That's not the fault of the oil - that's GM's fault for cutting corners on this engine. Never in my life have I seen an engine from ANY era start wearing out this soon. 90k miles. My first analysis was at 77k!!

 

GM should just consult with other companies on how to cut corners to save a buck. Might as well stick with what you're good at, and leave the rest to the experts ... but I digress ...

 

If you don't tow, or are light footed when driving, you can easily go 10k, then send in an analysis to see how everything looks. If it's good, you can go up to 15k. The oil is good to 25k, but that's in cars, IMO. Any truck that's used as a truck is going to be hard on the oil, no matter how good it is.

Edited by Jsdirt
  • Like 1
Posted

Well, they said I could buy my own oil and stuff. They'd change it for free. How often do you change your oil while running Amsoil SS?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's rated for 25k

883e6350508550ded4ffddc4f772b109.jpg

Posted (edited)

I run an amsoil bypass filter...it more than doubles my cost of an oil change.

 

The filter does come out quite a bit heavier than when first installed.

 

But IMO if I wanted to throw money away I would buy amsoil oil and full flow filter.

 

 

Huge savings buying Mobil oil and filters on sale.

Edited by Chevor
Posted

Just remember that these oils are being tested in labs under ideal conditions, not out on the road doing the kind of driving that YOU do.

Posted

Just remember that these oils are being tested in labs under ideal conditions, not out on the road doing the kind of driving that YOU do.

I abuse the loud pedal. In fact it allows me to have dual mode exhaust a lot cheaper than the GM performance cars

Posted

Ordered a new radiator bracket that is welded to the frame. Going to go junkyard hunting tomorrow to see if I can get the entire core support on the cheap. Lights on the left don't exactly line up. There is a gap by the grille and they look pushed in. Since the lights mount to that, I'm going to replace it.

Posted

Saw this at the grocery store

5b7667dc212e6e85a96a64a6c2b24d9b.jpg

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...