Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Did you use your stock U bolts or get new ones?

Edited by Coles5515
  • Like 1
Posted

Good evening Gentleman. Long time lurker, first time poster. I bought my 2016 LT CC in June of 2016. I'm currently stuck between a 2.25" procomp leveling kit or the 4" procomp lift. I'm looking at running at 20x10 -24 offset wheel on 33s. Not sure of a tire yet. Does anyone know if this will rub? I'm okay with trimming the front valance some but really not comfortable with the idea of metal trimming. If I need to go down to a 20x9 0 offset without having too many issues so be it. I'm willing to compromise...to an extent lol. Thanks ahead of time!

befce7137206c272a7a034d3cba2fb88.jpg

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

go with a -12 offset and it will rub very little no trim will be needed

 

 

SuperAllTerrain

Posted (edited)

Yeah true. Not a fan of all that either. I've decided on the motofab 2.5" front kit but I'm going back and forth between the 1" and 2" blocks to go in the rear. Do you have any pics of your setup?

2.5 is a great safe bet for sure, and will Look awesome. Not sure if all factory blocks are 1.25, but mine were. 2.25 left me with about 1 inch of rake.

 

These are some pics I could dig up real quick. Hope this helps!

post-160004-0-16685700-1494944056_thumb.jpg

post-160004-0-51849500-1494944063_thumb.jpg

post-160004-0-07908900-1494944071_thumb.jpg

post-160004-0-16685700-1494944056_thumb.jpg

post-160004-0-51849500-1494944063_thumb.jpg

post-160004-0-07908900-1494944071_thumb.jpg

post-160004-0-16685700-1494944056_thumb.jpg

post-160004-0-51849500-1494944063_thumb.jpg

post-160004-0-07908900-1494944071_thumb.jpg

post-160004-0-16685700-1494944056_thumb.jpg

post-160004-0-51849500-1494944063_thumb.jpg

post-160004-0-07908900-1494944071_thumb.jpg

Edited by Travis1024
  • Like 3
Posted

2.5 is a great safe bet for sure, and will Look awesome. Not sure if all factory blocks are 1.25, but mine were. 2.25 left me with about 1 inch of rake.

 

These are some pics I could dig up real quick. Hope this helps!

Whats your tire size? Any rubbing? Nice ride for sure

Posted

Whats your tire size? Any rubbing? Nice ride for sure

Thanks man! I'm running 33x12.50r20. I have a slight rub on the UCA at around 85%+ lock due to the width of the tires.

 

Planned on an 11.5 or so inch wide tire, but got an absolute steal on these

Posted

Woychc- am I missing it on their website? I just see the blocks or do they come with u bolts?

Posted

Woychc- am I missing it on their website? I just see the blocks or do they come with u bolts?

My buddy ordered it for me when he was ordering his kit. I think he called in cause it wasn't on their website.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Removed the RC 2 in level and installed Bilstein 5100 all around with the front set at the highest setting.14b2b255671860c5f92c49611a4da9a3.jpg

 

Sent from my LG-H820 using Tapatalk

I'm...yeah. That settles it. I have an identical truck, and that's just the look I'm after. Sweet ride.

Posted (edited)

I'm...yeah. That settles it. I have an identical truck, and that's just the look I'm after. Sweet ride.

 

Good Looking truck for sure man! How'd you black out your ambers in the front?

 

Also, do you happen to have fender height measurements? Yours looks about the same height as mine, but i've got 2.5 front and 1 rear

 

EDIT - sorry, quoted the wrong post and dont know how to delete hahah

Edited by Travis1024
Posted

Removed the RC 2 in level and installed Bilstein 5100 all around with the front set at the highest setting.14b2b255671860c5f92c49611a4da9a3.jpg

 

Sent from my LG-H820 using Tapatalk

 

Good Looking truck for sure man! How'd you black out your ambers in the front?

Also, do you happen to have fender height measurements? Yours looks about the same height as mine, but i've got 2.5 front and 1 rear with a full 33

Posted

Removed the RC 2 in level and installed Bilstein 5100 all around with the front set at the highest setting.14b2b255671860c5f92c49611a4da9a3.jpg

 

Sent from my LG-H820 using Tapatalk

Do you know how the front to back now measures? How's the ride? I would like to go this route.
Posted

Do you know how the front to back now measures? How's the ride? I would like to go this route.

Front is at 39 and rear at 39.5. Ride is a better than the stock Rancho

 

Sent from my LG-H820 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

So through all the pages of this thread I know some guys are running the 2.5" front with a 3" block. What is your rake like? Pictures would be great!

Here's another one with 2.5" front and 3" rear with 305/55R20's. I got my 3" from RC and the ubolts had to be purchased separately.

 

Part #'s:

 

9/16-inch Square U-bolts (2.5 x 10.5)

7652

1

$29.95

3-inch Rear Lift Blocks

6594

1

$33.95

 

IMG 0336

Posted

I have a difference of almost 1" at the rear fenders.

Driver side fenders are 37 1/4" front and 38 3/4" in the rear; 1.5" difference.

 

Passenger side fenders are 37 3/8" front and 37 7/8" in the rear; 0.5"

 

This is after I just put Bilstein 5100s at the highest setting on the front and no change to the back.

 

I know the rake in these trucks aren't always consistent but has anyone seen the difference of almost 1" in the rear? Do you think my rear passenger shock is shot causing the 1" sag? Seems weird to me at only 20,000 miles but they are the stock shocks on an LT.

71c0a53a0d5dfc1eb23034d33ce1c3a8.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Well one of our most reliable vehicles was sold yesterday. The first and only I gave for free to a grandkid. If they got skin in the game they take care of it. My wife bought new. Five years later my daughter got it to use. We got it back and gave it to our grandson after graduation. He did zero maintenance just oil changes. When the AC quit he drove his mother’s car rather than get it fixed. Instead he just bought a beater and sold the Elantra. 
    • I usually do as well or better than the sticker for mileage. Usually better going west than east. North then South. Wind makes a difference. I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist. But it did dawn on me I’m going by the vehicle calculation. Now that would be interesting.
    • https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/fuel-economy-stickers-don-t-tell-the-whole-story-aaa-data-reveals-why/ar-AA26ocHk?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=6a4122ea3dae47e5b8dfbed5d4fd3d55&cvpid=648f6b4fc2fa4eddb4c12893aeb957ed&ei=59
    • What’s missing in all this is patience and investment in the future. Buy a 170K starter home. Ten years later sell it invest in a more expensive home. Eventually you’ll have a 600K home and pay starter home payments. Buy a starter car. Maintain it well. Save the payments after it’s payed for then buy an expensive car if you desire. Buy a tumbler make your own coffee, pack your lunch. Cook your own dinner. Most importantly take care of your car.
    • People mislead themselves. Statistics are highly useful indicators.   Here's the tie-in to this thread. If an oil sample tests shows a wear indicator of 7 using cheaper ACDelco oil, and a wear indicator of 2 (lower = less wear) using a particular brand of Mobil oil, and wear has a linear relationship with engine lifespan, anyone could assume that Mobil is reducing wear by more than 50% (let's just say a 200% reduction for you red state people trying hard to do math) which leads to increasing engine life by 2x. Perhaps, in a vacuum, by itself, when dreamed by AI.   Yeah?! That's what the statistic is saying, isn't it?   No, it isn't. It didn't come out and say engine life is doubled. That's a very bad assumption, and a case of severe myopia by assuming something potentially untrue about the only data point in focus.   Average cost of a new car is 50k. You bet it is.   The median cost of a new car is more like 35k. Expensive cars are skewing the perception that "average" now means a $50k price of entry for a very average automobile. And that's not true. People who don't understand statistics twist the living heck out of them to mean all sorts of things they don't actually mean.   "Average" new car payment is $1000/month. Yep, it is. And in that number are all the $35k new car buyers who bring significant equity, and the $25k new car buyers who finance the car for a month just to get a rebate, and then pay it off. Know what isn't in that number? All the payments made by people who don't finance a car.   Picking one's own data point (don't have a car payment, never paid $50k for a new vehicle, my house cost $170k, I afforded a middle class lifestyle on $4.50/hr) is just a data point. Just like earning $25/hr in an area where the median home price is almost $1 Million is a data point. In fact, it's a lot of data points given that 80% of the US population lives in/around major cities. They're not idiots; the vast majority of them do it to make a living because that's where the big money is.   The highs have become higher, lows have become lower, and how your personal mileage varies is not truth for an entire country. At the same time you can't NOT acknowledge the data. While it doesn't paint YOUR personal picture, it certainly tints the reality that you also live in, as does your single data point.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...