Jump to content

2014+ Leveling Kits

bcazier

By bcazier
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

So i put my RC 2" level kit and Toyo 295/55/20's on this weekend. Install was simple, just like on my 2011. It definitely helps to have an extra set of hands when wedging that spacer in there. 295/

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

Thanks. Here is one more from yesterday. Considering we're getting 8-10 inches of rain the next two days, I won't be taking any better pics soon.  

FH212
FH212

Mine is finally done! After months of research I went with the RC 2.5" level kit front only, stock rear block. 20"x9" Fuel Nutz w/ +1 offset, 33x12.50x20 Toyo M/T tires. No rubbing, No trimming, yet a

Posted Images

nmyron Enthusiast

nmyron

Posted
Posted (edited)

Man that's Crazy. I appreciate the head up in advance. They guy at my shop said I could probably pull off a 285/55/20 but wouldn't recommend I go to a 295/55/20. He said he just dealt with a similar situation on the same truck. Out of curiosity, what size tire where you trying to run? Did you try your stock 275/55/20 with the level kit and still have issues?

Did you consider the rough country kit that combines the 2" level with the 1.25" body kit? They claim this kits is made to run 33s on 20s. Anyone have experience with this kit? I'm strongly considering it.

Stock 20's on the stock Contis, rubbed the sidewall on the upper control arm. During the realignment after removing the lift the tech pointed out that I, too, was rubbing the inner rim edges against the UCA as well as JJT suggested his brother was experiencing. Edited by nmyron
NEOutDoors Enthusiast

NEOutDoors

Posted
Posted (edited)

Stock 20's on the stock Contis, rubbed the sidewall on the upper control arm. During the realignment after removing the lift the tech pointed out that I, too, was rubbing the inner rim edges against the UCA as well as JJT suggested his brother was experiencing.

Oh Man... So the lift alone (everything else stock) caused rubbing due to the alignment change. That sucks! Looks like I need a new truck.

 

So the only work around is to get new wheels... spacers wont solve it?

 

What about going with a legit lift like a 4.5" or something?

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Edited by NEOutDoors
NEOutDoors Enthusiast

NEOutDoors

Posted
Posted (edited)

I just performed the 2" Rough Country lower spacer level on my 2017 with stamped steel arms. I have done several levels on GMT900's and K2XX's, using the upper pucks. This one was a relative breeze. I did not remove the tie rod ends, or unplug the rack. I only loosened the upper nuts, removed the upper ball joint, and obviously the lower two bolts. Everything was buttoned up in about a hour and 20 mins.

gm-lift-kit_13078-base.jpg

attachicon.giflevel.jpg

... have you had any of the rubbing issues that have been mentioned? I wonder if the difference in the 2" kit vs the 2.5" is causing rub issues.

Edited by NEOutDoors
Csjumper2003 Enthusiast

Csjumper2003

Posted
Posted

Oh Man... So the lift alone (everything else stock) caused rubbing due to the alignment change. That sucks! Looks like I need a new truck.

 

So the only work around is to get new wheels... spacers wont solve it?

 

What about going with a legit lift like a 4.5" or something?

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

If you need new rims because of offset then spacers should do the same and fix the issue cheaper.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

nmyron Enthusiast

nmyron

Posted
Posted

Oh Man... So the lift alone (everything else stock) caused rubbing due to the alignment change. That sucks! Looks like I need a new truck.

 

So the only work around is to get new wheels... spacers wont solve it?

 

What about going with a legit lift like a 4.5" or something?

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

It's possible spacers would solve it. I just don't really feel like adding a failure point between my hubs and wheels. That's just more work any time I need to get in there, as you'd have to torque the spacers, then torque the wheels... Then the added complexity of figuring out how to stop the hubs from spinning while torqueing down the spacers... Then driving it 500 miles, pulling the wheels to check the spacer torque, then re-torqueing the wheels... That's 2 hours of a weekend that are much better spent elsewhere. I bought a new truck to have something I don't need to fix every few months. If I wanted to keep working underneath a truck I would've kept my last ride :-) There are plate spacers that are available from Rough Country, and there is a place called WheelTech on eBay that sells solid Billet plates in 6x5.5 for GM trucks in 8mm as well. Both are options, but in the thread where these were mentioned, the OP never replied as to if any long term issues were experienced with them. So, without some solid "Hey I've had these for 2 years and they're great" kind of reviews, I'm very leery of installing them. The last thing I need is to be hauling a trailer or going on a trip with my fam and lose a wheel cause my studs sheared off. Also, there is the added complexity of the fact that there is not a shop around that will work with them. If you have spacers, and have to have your brakes done or some such, the shops around me won't re-install your spacers per their company policy. They have to remove them, and leave them inside the truck for you to re-install after delivery. Again, more headache than I'm interested in dealing with. If the spacers are the bolt down variety, it's very possible that I'd have to cut the studs down to fit them under the wheels, resulting in the shop saying they can't put my wheels back on because my studs are too short, as well, since they can't reinstall the spacers before installing the wheels.

 

I'm sure a good suspension lift with new UCA's would do it. Their 4.75" is a combo suspension/body... Body lifts aren't true lifts however, they offer no advantage in the real world except to lift the body off the frame, and require in this case adding brackets to relocate parts from the factory locations. I'd probably opt for the 5" suspension lift. But then again, it's $1300 :-) And I don't need 5" more ground clearance, or the reduced gas mileage inherent in blowing the current setup's aerodynamics by jacking it up that high off the ground and the added underbody positive air pressure. I'd be more likely to pick up some stock-alike wheels with a higher offset if I were to go back to it. But, honestly, now that it's out, I'm not interested. If anything, I'm a little upset at myself for wasting the money in the first place. It just seemed like a good idea at the time, and a cheaper alternative to new wheels and/or a full lift kit. But, as I already knew all too well, cheaper is not always better.

 

Some people are having great luck with this stuff, but I note that the majority of those folks also sprung for new, higher-offset wheels and larger tires. I was hoping to keep everything stock but the front ride height. But that doesn't seem in the cards for me. I bought the Sierra for the look, the mileage, and some other things like integrated trailer brake controller and such. I could've gotten a lifted one off the lot, as my dealership sells models that have lifts pre-installed. Next time I buy, I might consider that instead. That way it's already done for me, and I don't have to get into it on my own. You live, you learn I guess :-)

2017SierraSLT Senior Enthusiast

2017SierraSLT

Posted
Posted

... have you had any of the rubbing issues that have been mentioned? I wonder if the difference in the 2" kit vs the 2.5" is causing rub issues.

 

 

No rubbing whatsoever, but I am running the stock tires until they wear out.

  • Like 1
DanZ71 Enthusiast

DanZ71

Posted
Posted

Man that's Crazy. I appreciate the head up in advance. They guy at my shop said I could probably pull off a 285/55/20 but wouldn't recommend I go to a 295/55/20. He said he just dealt with a similar situation on the same truck. Out of curiosity, what size tire where you trying to run? Did you try your stock 275/55/20 with the level kit and still have issues?

Did you consider the rough country kit that combines the 2" level with the 1.25" body kit? They claim this kits is made to run 33s on 20s. Anyone have experience with this kit? I'm strongly considering it.

Who makes a 1.25" body lift for 2017 silverado?

mrhonestlyinsane Enthusiast

mrhonestlyinsane

Posted
Posted

Nmyron,

What you are talking about makes no sense. I ran the rough country kit 2inch with stock rims and tires with no issue. Nothing gets changed with steering geometry. Basically all you are changing is ride height by lengthening the strut.

So if you took the stock truck and jacked it up with a jack you have the same affect. All that should have changed is camber. If everything is stock except the level nothing should rub. I ran a 275/65r20 on my level and had no rubbing except the fender liner which gets tied back.

I know the 2017 trucks got different uca's but it shouldn't matter. If a level caused a rub I think it will rub without the level also.

KurtA Enthusiast

KurtA

Posted
Posted

Finally installed a Motofab 2" leveling kit on my shortbed two-door. Truck still has 1-1/4" of forward bias.

post-174092-0-49186100-1505046772_thumb.jpeg

post-174092-0-49186100-1505046772_thumb.jpeg

post-174092-0-49186100-1505046772_thumb.jpeg

post-174092-0-49186100-1505046772_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 1
GoBlue2014LT Enthusiast

GoBlue2014LT

Posted
Posted

Finished the level by swapping the rear blocks and getting alignment.

 

Stock

2.5" front level

Swapped rear blocks (1" lift)

 

65d2aabfb281a5099d0a17cd40b86d8c.jpg

 

Wheels and tires soon

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

STINSAN3 Senior Enthusiast

STINSAN3

Posted
Posted

Finished the level by swapping the rear blocks and getting alignment.

 

Stock

2.5" front level

Swapped rear blocks (1" lift)

 

65d2aabfb281a5099d0a17cd40b86d8c.jpg

 

Wheels and tires soon

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Where did you het the block at? That looks perfect.

I got the 2.5 Motofab one too, haven't installed it.

GoBlue2014LT Enthusiast

GoBlue2014LT

Posted
Posted

 

Where did you het the block at? That looks perfect.

I got the 2.5 Motofab one too, haven't installed it.

Came as a kit on Amazon

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

nmyron Enthusiast

nmyron

Posted
Posted

Nmyron,

What you are talking about makes no sense. I ran the rough country kit 2inch with stock rims and tires with no issue. Nothing gets changed with steering geometry. Basically all you are changing is ride height by lengthening the strut.

So if you took the stock truck and jacked it up with a jack you have the same affect. All that should have changed is camber. If everything is stock except the level nothing should rub. I ran a 275/65r20 on my level and had no rubbing except the fender liner which gets tied back.

I know the 2017 trucks got different uca's but it shouldn't matter. If a level caused a rub I think it will rub without the level also.

I appreciate your opinion. But I am back to bone stock, and I have no wheel or tire contact at my UCA after removing the lift. The act of lengthening the strut does change the steering geometry. If it didn't, there would be no need for realignment to reset the camber. The act of shifting the lower control arm down with the spacers moves the spindle down, which in turn requires moving the UCA down. All this is a change from the stock steering geometry.

 

When you install these lifts, you have to use a prybar to pull the UCA down so the balljoint reinserts into the upper ball joint through hole in the spindle. This is not necessary without the lift, because the spindle returns to it's stock height. I am able to lift the spindle into place with a jack and pin it in place with out a prybar. Without the lift, geometry returns to normal.

 

As I said, I'm not guaranteeing anything. Simply sharing my experience. Maybe you have had little to no need to drive at steering lock, or maybe your camber kit setup on your truck was a bit different. I can't speak to that. What I can speak to are the polished spots on my UCA's and the back edges of my wheels where my tire and wheel made contact while pulling in/out my driveway. I live on a narrow street, with a double car drive, and have to take the truck to lock to make the turn onto my driveway skirt. This is where I found the rub. Others can also speak to this same experience per the posts I have linked.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 461 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • davester
      2015 Silverado 3500 right rear turn indicator failure

      By davester · Posted

      consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • davester
      My First Project and GMC has me stumped

      By davester · Posted

      can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • Chuck FB
      Tire pressure for 37s

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Snowcamo
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By Snowcamo · Posted

      Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...