Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, WT432 said:

I have a 2015 GMC Sierra 1500 Z71 4x4 Crew Cab all stock with 265/65 -18 inch Wheels/rims. I was wanting to raise or level out the truck, but still want a slight rake for payload. I don't want the front higher if i put anything in my bed. I have read many forums comparing the 2 inch RC in the front vs the 2.5 inch level RC changing the front and rear. The only discussions i have seen involve non z71 trucks.  For those who have a z71 truck which one do you prefer?

 

My plan was just to do the basic RC 2 inch level in the front and go with 285/65-18 tires, but would hate for the nose to be too high. Should I stick with my plan or go to the 2.5" or find a 1.5" level in the front. Thank you

Get measurements. I got the 2.5" and have only installed the front, it's a tad nose high but honestly I can't tell unless I pull a tape on it or if it's sitting just right. If you do the 2.5", put the rear block in. I'm gonna put mine in just to see what it looks like. This is on a 2014 Z71.

Edited by thutchi3
Posted
I have a 2015 GMC Sierra 1500 Z71 4x4 Crew Cab all stock with 265/65 -18 inch Wheels/rims. I was wanting to raise or level out the truck, but still want a slight rake for payload. I don't want the front higher if i put anything in my bed. I have read many forums comparing the 2 inch RC in the front vs the 2.5 inch level RC changing the front and rear. The only discussions i have seen involve non z71 trucks.  For those who have a z71 truck which one do you prefer?
 
My plan was just to do the basic RC 2 inch level in the front and go with 285/65-18 tires, but would hate for the nose to be too high. Should I stick with my plan or go to the 2.5" or find a 1.5" level in the front. Thank you


Just go with bilsteins at Max height. FHLH (user on here) has them with the exact tire size you're looking at and the truck looks great.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
18 hours ago, WT432 said:

I have a 2015 GMC Sierra 1500 Z71 4x4 Crew Cab all stock with 265/65 -18 inch Wheels/rims. I was wanting to raise or level out the truck, but still want a slight rake for payload. I don't want the front higher if i put anything in my bed. I have read many forums comparing the 2 inch RC in the front vs the 2.5 inch level RC changing the front and rear. The only discussions i have seen involve non z71 trucks.  For those who have a z71 truck which one do you prefer?

 

My plan was just to do the basic RC 2 inch level in the front and go with 285/65-18 tires, but would hate for the nose to be too high. Should I stick with my plan or go to the 2.5" or find a 1.5" level in the front. Thank you

if you carry cargo on a regular basis and are worried about the payload weighing down your rear, the best option is airbags.

Posted
On 4/11/2018 at 1:29 PM, WT432 said:

I have a 2015 GMC Sierra 1500 Z71 4x4 Crew Cab all stock with 265/65 -18 inch Wheels/rims. I was wanting to raise or level out the truck, but still want a slight rake for payload. I don't want the front higher if i put anything in my bed. I have read many forums comparing the 2 inch RC in the front vs the 2.5 inch level RC changing the front and rear. The only discussions i have seen involve non z71 trucks.  For those who have a z71 truck which one do you prefer?

 

My plan was just to do the basic RC 2 inch level in the front and go with 285/65-18 tires, but would hate for the nose to be too high. Should I stick with my plan or go to the 2.5" or find a 1.5" level in the front. Thank you

I've got an 18 Z71 and installed the Ready Lift 2.25" (left the back stock)and it's not nose high.  I think it looks great.  I've had a couple hundred lbs in the back and it didn't look noticeably nose high to me at all.  I'm sure if I load it up it likely would, but that's few and far between for me.      

Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, TRG said:

I've got an 18 Z71 and installed the Ready Lift 2.25" (left the back stock)and it's not nose high.  I think it looks great.  I've had a couple hundred lbs in the back and it didn't look noticeably nose high to me at all.  I'm sure if I load it up it likely would, but that's few and far between for me.      

i would 100% agree here...these trucks are made as sturdy as the older 3/4 ton trucks (huge difference between my 2002 and my 2008...and now a big difference between my 2008 and my 2016...if you load the truck down so much that you are squatting this thing, and on a regular basis) i would almost say that would be worth a 3/4 ton, because you might be overloading it...i have loaded the hell out of my truck and you can tell, but it is pretty minimal...again, not like the older models...

 

but having said that...if you are that worried about it, like i said air bags would be your best bet, and probably cheaper than stepping up to a 3/4 ton!

Edited by spenpet
Posted
On 8/2/2017 at 9:09 PM, ducklawyer said:

2" with 285/55 ko2s

Will go higher next time

 

post-155890-150172612289_thumb.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

post-155890-150172612289_thumb.jpg

post-155890-150172612289_thumb.jpg

post-155890-150172612289_thumb.jpg

Would you go 285 60?

 

On 8/2/2017 at 9:09 PM, ducklawyer said:

2" with 285/55 ko2s

Will go higher next time

 

post-155890-150172612289_thumb.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

post-155890-150172612289_thumb.jpg

post-155890-150172612289_thumb.jpg

post-155890-150172612289_thumb.jpg

Would you go 285 60?

Posted
On 3/15/2017 at 11:00 PM, woychc said:

Here's mine with 2.5" front and 3" rear blocks.

 

8ddac9a0a0cc79b7f175e7b3fcd8dce8.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do you have any rubbing issues? I currently have a 285 55 hankook on my truck and sometimes wish I had more tire. I have 2” leveling in front. That looks really good. How does it drive at 75-80 mph?

 

On 3/15/2017 at 11:00 PM, woychc said:

Here's mine with 2.5" front and 3" rear blocks.

 

8ddac9a0a0cc79b7f175e7b3fcd8dce8.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Posted

I installed a rough country 2.5 inch front and 2 inch rear blocks on my 2016 Z71.  I have stamped steel control arms and instructions said 3-4 hour install.  It took 3 people with vehicle on a lift 10 hours.  Biggest time consuming issue was getting the upper control arm to come loose on both sides.  In the end still worth it love how it looks and drives.  Running 275/65R20 tires (34 inch) on stock rims with zero rubbing and no trimming needed.

D84F6C05-B36F-4524-9407-1A7A07456991.jpeg

9061F932-97DE-4F43-9371-16E75A9D2B6A.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

I have a 2017 Silverado 1500 with stamped steel control arms. Can I get away with a 2” level safely and not rip upper ball joints out? Ready lifts site makes it sound like I shouldn’t do any level or lift without changing my control arms. 

Posted

I have a 2017 Silverado 1500 with stamped steel control arms. Can I get away with a 2” level safely and not rip upper ball joints out? Ready lifts site makes it sound like I shouldn’t do any level or lift without changing my control arms. 

Posted (edited)

My 2017 Silverado Z71 with 2 inch Rough Country front leveling kit. 

 

 

IMG_0114.JPG

IMG_0112.JPG

Edited by Darthvader
Posted
My 2017 Silverado Z71 with 2 inch Rough Country front leveling kit. 
 
 
IMG_0114.thumb.JPG.94eab2a034e023f2e768d2e2b7c10744.JPG
IMG_0112.thumb.JPG.e481a45748c7148c7cd82a416d994bbb.JPG


Is this the lower strut spacer? Any clunks or anything when going over bumps? Also what size tires?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
4 minutes ago, jgraves13 said:

 


Is this the lower strut spacer? Any clunks or anything when going over bumps? Also what size tires?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Yes, it is. No clunks at all. They are stock Z71 tires. 265/65/18

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Those are parts changers. It can get expensive though. I was a mechanic for 30 yrs. My truck has made this noise since new. I really don`t know what it is. It really doesn`t bother me. I`m still in warranty but have not brought it to the dealer.   I`m not buying the oil pump prime thing. Screw the TSB. I believe it`s in the trans pump gears. They rattle when that piss poor ULV oil drains off after a while. I believe those sharp tooth gears, with backlash, can rattle when dry. Not a vane style oil pump. Wonder who`s right? Me, or the TSB?🤔   Maybe I`m wrong?
    • Sounds about right. I miss the days of mechanics lol. 
    • On the PCM side, blue PCM connector, pin 18, solid gray color (no stripe) wire circuit 435.  That is the EGR low circuit which an issue on that line (be it the wiring, the PCM or the EGR valve or system performance) will trigger P0401 when it tests that code.     There is also a VERY old TSB that states to make sure you clear the DTCs ANY time the PCM is unplugged, reprogrammed, or if the EGR valve is unplugged or replaced as the PCM has an auto zero function in the PCM for the EGR pintle data   61-65-59: SMU - SECTION 6E - ENGINE CONTROLS - CLEAR DTC'S - (Nov 25, 1996)   "CLEAR ANY DTCS FROM THE VCM ANYTIME AFTER DOING VCM REPLACEMENT/ PROGRAMMING, TURNING THE IGNITION ON WHILE THE EGR VALVE IS DISCONNECTED, OR REPLACING THE EGR VALVE."   Some diagnostic aid notes in the GM diag on P0401 for a 1995 S10 Blazer:   Diagnostic Aids Notice: In order to prevent further damage if the EGR valve shows signs of excessive heat, check the exhaust system for blockage (possibly a plugged converter) using the procedure found on the restricted exhaust system check. If the exhaust system is restricted, repair the cause; one of which might be an injector which is open due to one of the following reasons: Stuck Grounded driver circuit Check the oil for possible fuel contamination if a stuck open fuel injector is found. Poor connection or damaged harness - Inspect VCM harness connectors for the following conditions: Backed out terminal BL 18 Improper mating Broken locks Improperly formed or damaged terminal Poor terminal to wire connection Damaged harness Intermittent test - If connections and harness check OK, monitor a digital voltmeter connected between terminal BL 18 and ground while moving related connectors and wiring harness. If the failure is induced, the voltage reading will change.
    • maybe get a service manual off ebay?  or check charm.li (website) or subscribe to alldata.com for it?
    • This biggest difference in a HM oil is in contains some  "Seal Conditioner". DEXOS oils and most shelf oils are "Dry" oils which over time harden seals. "Seal Conditioner" is more times than not, an Ester. Addition will soften the seals over time but will not repair one that leaks or has cracked. Esters also provide some cleaning but these HM oils don't contain enough to solve out hard deposits. Just the soft stuff.  Also a function of an Ester.    Ester's are not 'allowed' as a 'co-base" by license. Weird, right?  A certain amount is allowed as an additive. Bunch of game playing is what it is. It's why HM oils don't have a DEXOS approval.    DEXOS is a license 'with' a specification but is not a specification. Never was, never will be. It's GM's slot machine always paying the house. Use what you like.       
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...