Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Very clean looking truck! Looks like a lowered truck done right. Is it 4x4 or 2wd?

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

 

It is a 2wd

Posted

 

It is a 2wd

In this case that's great. Usually lowered 4wd trucks are hacked up. If you don't mind me asking what did you pay?

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Posted

 

Badass. :thumbs:

This is my cup of tea. The lowered looks great, but this is just right to me!

  • Like 2
Posted

E8ECCD96-44E7-4F1F-B794-FF9A80C01FA8_zps8CB7B838-C49D-41D0-87A7-3F21DB69F443_zpsMy contribution to this thread, no "grandpa mods".

2015 Gmc Sierra Slt 2wd

Fox 2.0's front and rear, Cognito Uca's, Weld Cheyenne 17x8.5 and MT Mtz 33x12.50's.

Great looking setup!

Posted

How do you all like this one!! c75bee8d5063914d08314e61a4c8b79e.jpg39913da1631d26c2866540074424d726.jpg

I think it looks great. I'd prefer the wheels not to have the red face plates, but your truck does pull it off well.

 

I'd rather look at and drive a truck like this with a nice lift and clean wheel tire combo and nothing else than a leveled truck with stock wheels and a light pods and bars, and steps, and mud flaps and what ever other crap hanging off it.

  • Like 1
Posted

Here is my 2014 Silverado High Country that I picked up a few months ago. I am not into lowered trucks with big wheels but I just could not pass up the deal I got on this. My friend is the used car sales manager at Planet Ford in Spring, Tx and they got this truck on trade in and couldn't sell it at the dealership because it had too many mods and no catalytic converters so he gave it to me for wholesale!

 

The truck is "UNDER CONSTRUCTION".

I will be raising it back to stock height with a leveling kit or maybe a 3.5in- 4in lift

Adding the 22in OEM Ck158 wheels (if I can ever find a set) LET ME KNOW IF YOU CAN!

Adding a muffler to it because it currently has long tube headers with a small resonator. SUPER LOUD but going to sound nice when I tame it.

 

The front end is also a 2500 conversion. Haven't even taken the Duramax badges off yet.

 

 

 

LET ME KNOW WHAT YOU THINK! Remember this isn't my style but it does look pretty awesome as it stands.

 

 

 

 

15994649_10211960525232240_4567871161622768899_o.jpg 15972487_10211960524912232_5298853879203725209_o.jpg 15875203_10211960525432245_8490744396048803925_o.jpg 15936472_10211960534712477_2833204966629374076_o.jpg 15937038_10211960528792329_8058973411876891848_o.jpg

Looks great, makes me want to do a 2500 front clip swap.

  • Like 1
Posted

I think it looks great. I'd prefer the wheels not to have the red face plates, but your truck does pull it off well.

 

I'd rather look at and drive a truck like this with a nice lift and clean wheel tire combo and nothing else than a leveled truck with stock wheels and a light pods and bars, and steps, and mud flaps and what ever other crap hanging off it.

EXACTLY

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

My 2017. I just finished installing 5100's front and rear. Let the addiction begin!

4d5ff18b490823d1116757a9c66ecfa7.jpg

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Posted

E8ECCD96-44E7-4F1F-B794-FF9A80C01FA8_zps8CB7B838-C49D-41D0-87A7-3F21DB69F443_zpsMy contribution to this thread, no "grandpa mods".

2015 Gmc Sierra Slt 2wd

Fox 2.0's front and rear, Cognito Uca's, Weld Cheyenne 17x8.5 and MT Mtz 33x12.50's.

What is the wheel offset?

  • Like 1
Posted

What is the wheel offset?

 

looks good . your tires are they the same as 285 ???

Posted

I think it looks great. I'd prefer the wheels not to have the red face plates, but your truck does pull it off well.

 

I'd rather look at and drive a truck like this with a nice lift and clean wheel tire combo and nothing else than a leveled truck with stock wheels and a light pods and bars, and steps, and mud flaps and what ever other crap hanging off it.

 

That is a clean combo, car rims in a massive size with stretched tires? I guess it's clean because it doesn't get used :dunno: I bet it drives real nice though :crackup: Atleast that other stuff you listed is actually mostly useful and can help the truck in doing oh I dunno truck stuff....

 

To each their own though, pretty easy to spot what owners do and use their trucks.

 

Tyler

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...