Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No complaints about my Bak-flip VP so far. My biggest complaint is the amount of freezing rain we've gotten in the last ~month, which I'm sure doesn't do any favours for the vinyl cover, but thus far, it keeps the bed dry and works exactly as advertised ..... simple operation, and full access to the bed.

Posted

I have the GM tri-fold hard cover. It does not leak. It will not leak. I have driven through blizzards and downpours and just annihilated the truck w/ a pressure wand after getting the whole thing caked w/ salt on my way up to VT and not one drop of water makes its way inside the bed.

 

Althought not totally secure by any means, locking the tailgate w/ the tonneaue snapped in place and the hard panels makes it much more difficult to get access to the bed compared to others, also, adding a bed extender turned inside out will make a nice little "trunk space" as well...

I have the GM tri-fold hard cover on both of my trucks as well. No leaks thus far. I like the covers.

Posted

Anyone have any tips on a single piece body color tonneau? I'm liking the looks of the lazerlite but they haven't released the 2014 model quite yet. If you've used a certain brand, how much did you pay and do you like it? Any tips would be good. My summit white Denali SB should be arriving in the next couple weeks and I want a body color tonneau on her right away along with a spray in liner.

Undercover LUX is supposed to be nice.

Posted

Undercover LUX are nice covers and paint match is good. I have had them on my last 3 trucks including my new 2014 LTZ and they have

always held up well with no leaks and look great. Low profile, strong, and light weight easily removed.

Posted

I installed one about 6 weeks ago. No complaints and i think its one of the best ones available. :thumbs:

 

I'm not 100% sure, but i think the GM hard folding cover is the fold-a-cover g4.

Yes one of the covers GM offers is the Fold-A-Cover. Had the parts guy I know price me one but I think the factory direct price will be better. I'm also interested in the caddy that drops in the front. Anyone here have it it ?

Posted

Yes - Thanks! I'm going to see if my dealer has both tri-fold tonneaus and see if there is a difference between them.

I think there is a difference between them while I have never seen the GM one I have the fold a cover g4 elite which I got from the dealer. I had the bak flip on my other truck and I like this much better. I too have been in down pours and covered in snow in VT and have never had a problem. I only had one spot where it was wet inside once. It was about the size of a dime and the truck had been sitting in a downpour all day. Fold a cover makes two covers the g4 elite and a lower model which is basically the same minus a few options I think. Fold a cover has some good videos on YouTube and even have a video of the g4 on a 14 silverado.

Posted

Got the access vanish today..directions are terrible comes w universal directions and another set for chevys..so confusing and so cold out..guess save for a better day..

Posted

Correction: The GM tonneau cover is a tri-fold. The fold-a-cover is a 4 panel cover. I saw a youtube video showing how the GM cover is installed and operates on a NNBS truck.

 

The rails are a part of the cover so as you fold the cover up, the rails go with it. It looks like a quick installation as the clamps are built in the rails. Looks pretty good. But I like the fold-a-cover for the front of the bed access. I think I am going to lean that way when I get ready to buy. But ChevyParts.com has the GM for $609 which is influencing me that way. That and bearman95's review. Decisions, decisions.... :dunno:

Posted

Fold-a-cover is really tempting. Going to call the local dealer tomorrow and get a price. I'm still leaning towards the undercover classic or SE because of the water resistance it gaurantees.

Posted

Yes one of the covers GM offers is the Fold-A-Cover. Had the parts guy I know price me one but I think the factory direct price will be better. I'm also interested in the caddy that drops in the front. Anyone here have it it ?

 

Dealer wanted over $1300 to install.........j just ordered direct for $795 (use promo code GMFS14FAC ).

Watched an install video and looks very easy.

Posted

Have you considered Retrax? I can't tell the pros and cons as I don't have one yet (still in the search for a tonneau). I just came across it here in the forum and it got me very interested. it looks to me like a secure cover, very easy to operate, leaks? Only Retrax owners can tell us.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

I've got the Chevy tri-fold hard cover. Initially wasn't impressed (my own expectations, previous AV owner) Been on the truck since September and I can honestly say, I love it. Does what it was designed to do, just wish the vinyl didn't flap in the wind.

 

Mike

Posted

I went with the Fold-A-Cover G4 Elite directly from Fold-A-Cover, not GM. GM wants $1160 (+tax) for this exact cover. I bought it direct from Fold-A-Cover online for $860 delivered. There was a no-shipping special before Christmas.

 

I can't really speak for how well it keeps out the rain yet, but I love the functionality of it. It's a quad fold, so more access to the bed (75%) without removing unit. And you can open both ends - great for accessing things that have slid all the way forward in the bed. And it locks on both ends, which completely secures everything in your bed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...