Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

First time poster, but long time browser...

 

I definitely notice the switching between modes and unlike others, I seem to notice it more as the speed increases. It almost seems like my truck is trying to stay in V4 mode longer then it should..for example, on a small uphill I will start to put my foot in the throttle to keep my speed and it will stay in V4 so I keep pressing the gas and then it feels like it downshifts as it finally switches into V8 mode. Not sure if that's normal or not but it does bug me. This is my first GM with AFM...Kinda makes me miss my old 2011.

 

 

 

Yeah that. Totally agree. Maybe since it is a new truck/engine there will be some future software updates that address this, hopefully. Or a custom tune if all else fails.

Posted

I could probably not tell when it kicked in on my hemi motor because it probably never did. The fuel mileage on that engine was amazing I could get almost 10mpg and I drove it like a granny. What was even better was that it had about a 17-18 gallon tank so I could almost get far enough away from the house so that I could not walk back and get a gas can when it ran out of gas.

Is the HEMI fuel economy really that bad? I wonder what it does in a 2500 series RAM which does not have the cylinder deactivation.

Posted

I could probably not tell when it kicked in on my hemi motor because it probably never did. The fuel mileage on that engine was amazing I could get almost 10mpg and I drove it like a granny. What was even better was that it had about a 17-18 gallon tank so I could almost get far enough away from the house so that I could not walk back and get a gas can when it ran out of gas.

Is the HEMI fuel economy really that bad? I wonder what it does in a 2500 series RAM which does not have the cylinder deactivation.

12-13 highway. Got one and dont like it.

Posted

Is the HEMI fuel economy really that bad? I wonder what it does in a 2500 series RAM which does not have the cylinder deactivation.

I had a Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited with the 5.7 Hemi, and it never got good gas mileage, on the open highway on a road trip we would see up to 15 mpg, normal mixed driving it would get around 11 mpg, if I went through a whole tank in the city we would see around 9.5 mpg. I do not put many miles on in a year so I never chased that cat as to why the mileage was so bad, I doubt the other hemi's are like that or else everyone would hear about it.

 

I have been driving jeeps for 23 years, and the taste from this last one steered me well away from Chrysler products I read these forums with some of the issues going on with the new 1500s and a lot of the issues sounds like a good day I had with that jeep.

 

The last straw was I took it in for a safety recall for the electronic transfer case shifting mechanism. Well the safety recall really worked because once I got it back I could no longer shift into 4lo. The dealership and manufacturer said that meant there was already a problem with the circuit board and it would only cost me around $850-$1000 to fix.

 

I felt like I went to the doctor and he punched me in the face and then tried to charge me for fixing a broken nose :P Be very leery of safety recalls.

Posted

Is the HEMI fuel economy really that bad? I wonder what it does in a 2500 series RAM which does not have the cylinder deactivation.

 

Yes, it's horrible. My window sticker said 20 hwy, no way it touches that. Read the forums, even the new ones with the 8-speeds aren't getting anywhere close to the sticker. With my Silverado, I can beat the sticker if I take it easy.

Posted
I could probably not tell when it kicked in on my hemi motor because it probably never did. The fuel mileage on that engine was amazing I could get almost 10mpg and I drove it like a granny. What was even better was that it had about a 17-18 gallon tank so I could almost get far enough away from the house so that I could not walk back and get a gas can when it ran out of gas.

Is the HEMI fuel economy really that bad? I wonder what it does in a 2500 series RAM which does not have the cylinder deactivation.

 

Until this year HD trucks were exempt from CAFE regulations so Chrysler had no reason to use it. That and I'd guess they don't want it on a truck that is more likely to be worked compared to 1500s which are used as big cars by many owners.

Posted

I had a 04 5.3 with a 4 speed, then I bought an 11 5.3 with a 6 speed. On paper the 04 was supposed to get 18 mpg highway and the 11 on paper 21 mpg highway. In real life, the 04 got 20 mpg highway and the 11 got 21 mpg. I think the 1 mph came from the extra gears in the tranny. I don't feel AFM buys you much. City mileage is within 1 mpg of the two vehicles also.

 

One major difference in highway mileage I have seen in my trucks is the actual speed, anything over 73 mph, the gas mileage nose dives, at least several miles per gallon. Under that, they get reasonable mileage. When I refer to the 20-21 mpg averages, that is for a full tank, so a 550-600 mile average.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Yes, I think that worrying about your truck's fuel economy too much is a moot point. In my case I drive a lot including a pretty long commute to work, so I use a car for most of my driving and use the truck when I need it, that is for towing my boat and for hauling. Heck, driving at least 35k miles a year, I would go bankrupt if I had to drive only my truck which gets 15 MPG city and 17 highway. I put about 340k miles on my Mazda 626 between 1999 and 2012, and 67k on my Impala in just last two years.

Edited by pm26
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I live in MN and it's been cold all winter and with the cold my v4 hardly gets used. Most mornings on my 17 mile trip to work it doesn't even go into v4. On the way home when temps might be slightly higher then in the morning it will usually go into v4 in the exact same place on the road but usually kicks back out another 1/2 mile or so down the road. I might see 1/4 mile stretch 2 to 3 times again before I get home where it's in v4.

 

Today I picked up 840 lbs of wood pellets to help offset the $5 plus a gallon propane price. The 840lbs was all in the bed of the truck and I decided to put the truck in tow haul mode. The temp was -17 and the wind was coming from my side, I could see it in the snow blowing across the road and a few flags I drove by. My truck went into v4 about 6 miles down the road (about the same time I put it in tow haul) and stayed in v4 as good or possibly better then when I'm empty in the summer. I could go up some small hills and stay in v4 and also accelerate on the flat road. Other then the bigger hills my truck stayed in v4 doing 60mph to 63mph. I just don't get it! I have almost a 1/2 ton of weight in the bed and now it decides to be fuel efficient! I would have though that tow haul wouldn't allow V4 or at least really limit how much it can use it.

Posted (edited)

Next time put at least 2,000 lbs in the bed of the truck and hope it will stay in the V4 mode permanently! :lol:

 

The only explanation I can offer for the thruck staying longer in the V4 mode with the load is that you drove a lot less agressively with the load and used less throttle.

Edited by pm26
Posted

Perhaps you were in a lower gear(because of the tow haul) which would make more rpm's and

maybe enough torque to make the v-4 work better. Try locking out 6th gear and seeing if the v-4 mode

works better. What gears do you have? 3.08?

Posted (edited)

3.43

3.42

 

And ChevyZ71LTZ has a point, using the tow/haul mode is the most logical explanation for the increased time in the V4 mode.

Edited by pm26

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...