Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks for the input, I might just go with the bigger tire and see how it works out. I have a friend with a 14 Silverado and he has 20x12 -44 offset with 285/55r20 trail grapplers and he just did the plastic mud flap trimming. I would assume I could fit a larger tire on a more narrow rim but I guess we will find out

Posted

I don't know if this is the right place to ask! :)

 

I bought factory 17" wheels like this:

 

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/vOT1pLekKHYLlJMfc0vtxnMzzLCVtIFEPanwDGGandr4XkgePmyIlorE_lDrA023i3jnSQCgsVqKEwcjscK6eTAvmM2J2RTcAtvk8Q6JX_JqY0NDxK0biDWYh8tKwmSsd5TP9f1Mn47NJfCRm0C-NNRRFOZ7jYGca9MoiKGFv6DDWkFTXkFRAdB558oe7ZU0rEqts14-lnfeICBoepsrwmIurqM_Upv9jz9I2r02v6nQqdyegH96pIow_VNjyzl_z6jJ1mtr0qj76oveGuO-THGkb9RXzVU7KgGEfF106zLZaTA59ZrMzba7L2qKAKR2JoPL_isUg1zLOI6iOUKUCHJ_Vyqev0lrIS18UYLBzX8qHL_jQlfEWK8mG88S9ee1zlk8Nl5hJGOZP4trQGyViXd0d4MpB5lwhW_ZnweYHe3u4kNXnefeHzDnAU7PdKWyP-4qQL1hqoOZ3IYLEf7bX8EKrPgaMYkdLIju2k4We45H8ayECtxeYJdqQpgbT1SPBbn2Z9M7vOQUVpiYPxEZ8h2Hsogy0j9MMqS78XSDa3EqDPWMVLaZ_sheL3Yr1jAalxUG=w694-h360-no

 

and I can't decide which tire is the best for this kind of wheels and stock factory lift 2016 silverado! I'm looking for a quiet ride, low noise, good for sand dunes!

here is the list:

1- Yokohama Geolander A/T-S 285/65R17 116H (H = 210km/h) has more aggressive pattern and can reach 210km/h but little bit smaller

2- Toyo Open Country H/T 285/70R17 117T (T= 190km/h) has best tread life and lives very long

3- Firestone A/T 285/70R17 117T has best price with A/T pattern too

 

any thoughts, opinions?

Posted (edited)

guys what tire/rim size you reccomend for a 5" lift on a 2014 silverado? front fender measurement is 40" & rear is 41" 1/2

Edited by Suspension
Posted

Cooper ATPs 275/60/20 on stock AT Black Rims

 

ydesudym.jpg

y3erane6.jpg

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk

Nice rims!

 

 

Ryan

Posted

Here is mine. 20" Stock High Country rims with 325/60R20 BFG ATs.

 

2570c6c918436e146c72ad8d9c982ae2.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Posted

I have posted on here before when I just had the leveling kit installed, not sure if I have posted since I installed RCX 5". Also added .5 Lower strut tgc spacer, total 5.5" of lift. I am running a 20x10 -12 fuel Mav. with Nitto trails. Do you guys think I could run a 295/60 with lift setup?? I am thinking of going to the Toyo AT II's also. Thanks in advance! post-136138-0-64762300-1453912322_thumb.jpeg

post-136138-0-64762300-1453912322_thumb.jpeg

post-136138-0-64762300-1453912322_thumb.jpeg

post-136138-0-64762300-1453912322_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted

Is anyone running hub-centric rings with aftermarket wheels? I'd love to find a set for my Methods.

 

Mine came with the wheels from BMF, no the tire shop didn't put them on and used the lug nuts that are supposed to align them, I have no vibration but I plan to rotate the wheels and put them on for security.

Posted (edited)

Finally was able to install my new wheels and tires.

305/55/20 Toyo AT2 Xtreme with XD Bully Matte Gray +18
2.25 inch Readylift level with 2 inch rear blocks. Not one bit of rubbing.

20160127 103747 1

20160127 103736

 

Edited by buckeye6
  • Like 1
Posted

Here is mine. 20" Stock High Country rims with 325/60R20 BFG ATs.

 

2570c6c918436e146c72ad8d9c982ae2.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What's the set up? Looks really good! Any trimming or rubbing?

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

The lift is a 6in RCX with the BFGs and stock rims. Never trimmed and no rubbing even with no offset. The The Amp Research running board really give it a clean look.

 

I have read a lot of people saying that RCX is not a high quality lift but I'm on my third one and my Father is on his third and neither one of us has had any problem.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

2.5" Level + 1.5" Body Lift

20x10 ET -24 Moto Metal MO970

33x12.50R20 Federal Couragia M/Ts

No Rubbing / No Trimming

 

MotoMetal970HDR4_zps7abc9770.jpg

 

MotoMetal970HDR2_zpsbb76fe94.jpg

 

MotoMetal970HDR1_zpse532191e.jpg

 

MotoMetal970HDR6_zps5cfae866.jpg

 

MotoMetal970HDR5_zpsa7eb4eb6.jpg

Great setup man! Im wondering about a similar setup if you dont mind giving me your input? Its for a 2014 Silverado LTZ 4x4

 

2.5" Front & 1.0" Rear lift

20"x9 Fuel Offroad Nutz +1 offset

305/55 32 x12.50 Cooper Discoverer STT Pro

 

Do you think compromising with the offset between this setup and yours and the 20"x9 instead of the 20"x10 allow me to fit without the 1.5" body lift with little to no trimming?

Ive heard different things and I know its hard to tell until its on the truck, but any input would be appreciated! Thanks!

Posted

 

Finally was able to install my new wheels and tires.

305/55/20 Toyo AT2 Xtreme with XD Bully Matte Gray +18
2.25 inch Readylift level with 2 inch rear blocks. Not one bit of rubbing.

 

 

Gotta a question for you if you dont mind?

 

I like your setup. Im thinking about something very similar. Do you think there would be any issues with a 2.5" Front & 1.0" Rear lift and putting 305/55/20 +1 offset? How much clearance do you have currently? Does it rub in 4 wheel drive any? Im not against trimming but id prefer not to. Thanks!

Posted

Traded my stock rims for 20x10 fuel maverick last night. Only pic I have so far. Sitting on stock tires for now. Going to get some new tires soon.

 

43e2ad4544b0396f8388e9a15a2281c3.jpg

9932e86feb6c33bf541e9e02de46daa0.jpg

  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...