Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yes and for the screw caps after you top off your brake light fluid

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 9 months later...
  • 3 months later...
Posted

Do you have a way to message directly either email/messenger or text? I’m interested in this type of cover for 5.3L 2014 Silverado but you’ve done more then most I’ve seen.

[email protected]

@gmgenvswitchguy

kenneth gay on FB

 

im seriously in need of info on this

Posted
2 hours ago, Kenneth Gay said:

Do you have a way to message directly either email/messenger or text? I’m interested in this type of cover for 5.3L 2014 Silverado but you’ve done more then most I’ve seen.

[email protected]

@gmgenvswitchguy

kenneth gay on FB

 

im seriously in need of info on this

Who are you wanting to get in contact with?

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 3/21/2018 at 8:00 PM, Kenneth Gay said:

Do you have a way to message directly either email/messenger or text? I’m interested in this type of cover for 5.3L 2014 Silverado but you’ve done more then most I’ve seen.

[email protected]

@gmgenvswitchguy

kenneth gay on FB

 

im seriously in need of info on this

Part numbers are listed throughout the posts however here is a consolidation:

 

Engine Cover:  Gm part number: 12643295  (2014 5.3 Silverado came with studs already in place for these covers)

Chevrolet Emblem: GM part number 92068693  (takes a little massaging to make this work right)

GMC Emblem:  GM part number 12620296

Studs:  GM part number 11611691 (some of the 5.3 engines do not have the studs 2014+)

 

  • Like 1
Posted
Part numbers are listed throughout the posts however here is a consolidation:
 
Engine Cover:  Gm part number: 12643295  (2014 5.3 Silverado came with studs already in place for these covers)
Chevrolet Emblem: GM part number 92068693  (takes a little massaging to make this work right)
GMC Emblem:  GM part number 12620296
Studs:  GM part number 11611691 (some of the 5.3 engines do not have the studs 2014+)
 
For the Chevrolet emblem, use part number 12620295. This part is a perfect fit. It is not flat as the part number listed above.

Sent from my SM-G960U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, rusty503 said:

For the Chevrolet emblem, use part number 12620295. This part is a perfect fit. It is not flat as the part number listed above.

Sent from my SM-G960U1 using Tapatalk
 

Awesome. You have a pic of it?

 

Parts list updated thanks to rusty503.

 

Part numbers are listed throughout the posts however here is a consolidation:

 

Engine Cover:  Gm part number: 12643295  (2014 5.3 Silverado came with studs already in place for these covers)

Chevrolet Emblem: GM part number 12620295 

GMC Emblem:  GM part number 12620296

Studs:  GM part number 11611691 (some of the 5.3 engines do not have the studs 2014+)

  • Like 1
Posted
Awesome. You have a pic of it?

 

Parts list updated thanks to rusty503.

 

Part numbers are listed throughout the posts however here is a consolidation:

 

Engine Cover:  Gm part number: 12643295  (2014 5.3 Silverado came with studs already in place for these covers)

Chevrolet Emblem: GM part number 12620295 

GMC Emblem:  GM part number 12620296

Studs:  GM part number 11611691 (some of the 5.3 engines do not have the studs 2014+)

Check out this thread http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/209463-Cadillac-escalade-engine-cover-on-a-chevy-Silverado-

My post starts at 28. Johnny01 beat me to a picture there.

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • 3 months later...
Posted
I am going a new route with my 2016. First to contact me for my cover and blacked logo emblem gets it at $50 shipped. SOLD.
post-133203-0-55546100-1467940241_thumb.jpg
post-133203-0-55546100-1467940241_thumb.jpg
post-133203-0-55546100-1467940241_thumb.jpg
post-133203-0-55546100-1467940241_thumb.jpg
What is the part # for the black chevy emblem? Johnnykinsler43

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Posted
3 hours ago, johnnykinsler43 said:

What is the part # for the black chevy emblem? Johnnykinsler43

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
 

Parts list is one post above yours. But I plastidip painted the center part to make it a black emblem.

Posted
IMG_20171218_225503.thumb.jpg.a7eb00aff4ce6349cfc66516e404bc23.jpg
IMG_20171218_225551.thumb.jpg.3d45c03510eb710407d3e0f2735e262e.jpg
IMG_20171218_225609.thumb.jpg.bc23149f7b6653244340424d58cfe61b.jpg
IMG_20171218_225616.thumb.jpg.d0be27e9c85b20ef93206903a1cfd42d.jpg
IMG_20171218_225702.thumb.jpg.f7b3263b03e0e178a9d82306b33a6f4b.jpg
What did you use to paint the GMC emblem on the truck? I'm talking about the plastic strip in the engine bay above the radiator.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, Rock1500 said:

What did you use to paint the GMC emblem on the truck? I'm talking about the plastic strip in the engine bay above the radiator.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

That is actually vinyl on there, I have a vinyl cutter and cut the letters out of white vinyl. Unfortunately that raised surface where it says GMC is very slick and after a couple drives the vinyl came up. So far I haven't made any other attempts or tried a different vinyl yet. Probably would just need a vinyl tack spray to do the trick. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks tight. Not a lot of working room. Hows yous knuckles?
    • Spot on. The government makes ridiculous mandates, and this causes manufacturers to jump through hoops for every TENTH of a MPG. Main reason quality is in the toilet and prices are in the stratosphere.   The gov't tightened the MPG requirements so much 5 years ago that the only way manufacturers could meet these absolutely ridiculous numbers was to go all EV. Hence the push.     Nobody hates good MPG, Atlas - nobody is "whining". Your side has that trait all locked up. What a stupid argument attempt!   What I particularly hate is the government meddling in the free market system. Had this system been allowed to work as designed and intended by our Founders, cars and trucks would be hitting numbers that would blow our minds, all while costing 30% LESS. Not only that, but engines could probably hit 150k miles again without needing major internal surgery.   My forty year old Ford 302 has 312k on it. Wonder what changed?🤔
    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...