Jump to content

Bilstein shocks thread

yanzhixiang

By yanzhixiang
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

Sierra Dan Senior Enthusiast

Sierra Dan

Posted
Posted

Aaron1121,

 

I have the stock ranchos, no lift or spacer in the front on mine now and still get the pogo stick, bucking on concrete highways.

This did not happen with my worn out rear stock ranchos.  So it must be the 5100s I have in the rear having a faster/more responsive rebound

which is probably why these 5100s suck up potholes better than the ranchos.

The lift amount in the front probably has nothing to do with the pogo bucking, compressed spring or not. 

Other than you , I have not come across anyone in these forums having the same problem as us with the 5100 shock.

 

  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

bwilloby46
bwilloby46

I put the bilstein 5100s on the rear of my 14 High Country with a new 2" block a few weeks ago. Ride is unbelievable compared to stock. Liked it so much I got the adjustable 5100s for my front, remove

schloppy
schloppy

Hello, I'm not new to the forum but I just joined and figured I'd contribute to the community.   2016 Silverado 1500 "Z71" removed rancho's and swapped with Bilstein 5100's all around. So after d

Jullian is not my name
Jullian is not my name

I just got done with installing my 6112's on my 2014 GMC Sierra Crew Cab.  Reading some install guides on here really helped, along with printing some Chilton Repair guide torque specs that I got from

Posted Images

Fasthotrod Enthusiast

Fasthotrod

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 4/10/2018 at 9:28 AM, Dtz7116 said:
Do you have any other pictures? I will be installing my 5100 next week. Your tire size is what I've been looking at, just not sure yet. Thanks! 

Sure... if you look closely, you can see where the front tire rubbed the inner liner at full lock before I put the new shocks on it. Doesn't rub now, though.

5d7f984445c912f0c431fdf1180ca7ff.jpg3d3922405df9d6f5bc2e2f4ab331cc26.jpg7bbca16778320d9b5baa3edded534e77.jpg


 

Edited by Fasthotrod
  • Like 1
Kubs Enthusiast

Kubs

Posted
Posted

I read through a lot of this topic, but not all.  I see mostly people replacing the Rancho Z71 shocks with the Bilsteins, but I didn't see anyone compare them to the NHT Max Trailering factory shocks.  I have has my '18 for a little more than a week now, and it seems a little bit bouncy.  I have not towed with it yet, but feel it may not be able to control weight all that well.  I dont know, maybe it gets better with some weight.

 

Anyone change out your factory NHT shocks for the 5100's and feel the change was worth it?  Any towing comparisons?

michigan2500hd Senior Enthusiast

michigan2500hd

Posted
Posted

Yes my 2015 is a NHT. Not sure what the difference is on the shocks. I bought it with 19,000 miles and when I would walk around in the bed it had more bounce than I thought it should, very soft. 

I trailered a little better than my 2011 non NHT 6.2 but when I changed the rear shocks to the Bilsteins the bucking and bouncing was improved greatly. When you walk or bounce in the truck bed there's almost no movement... Almost too stiff now maybe.

As for the front the Bilsteins took away the side to side " booble head" action when turning into a Parking lot and maybe a little more control when hitting "whoops" or large bumps. 

Problem is you feel every seam and little bump in the road. 

Bilstein doesn't show a part number last I checked for NHT equiped trucks. I raised the back with a swap of the blocks to get another 2" of height and used shock extensions. 

I'm going to take the Bilsteins in the front down to the first notch and install a zone leveling kit to hopefully smooth out the ride. My theory is that the max lift setting on the NHT gives a harsh ride... More controlled but it beats the truck to death and I don't want more rattles and squeaks. 

Kubs Enthusiast

Kubs

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, michigan2500hd said:

Yes my 2015 is a NHT. Not sure what the difference is on the shocks. I bought it with 19,000 miles and when I would walk around in the bed it had more bounce than I thought it should, very soft. 

I trailered a little better than my 2011 non NHT 6.2 but when I changed the rear shocks to the Bilsteins the bucking and bouncing was improved greatly. When you walk or bounce in the truck bed there's almost no movement... Almost too stiff now maybe.

As for the front the Bilsteins took away the side to side " booble head" action when turning into a Parking lot and maybe a little more control when hitting "whoops" or large bumps. 

Problem is you feel every seam and little bump in the road. 

Bilstein doesn't show a part number last I checked for NHT equiped trucks. I raised the back with a swap of the blocks to get another 2" of height and used shock extensions. 

I'm going to take the Bilsteins in the front down to the first notch and install a zone leveling kit to hopefully smooth out the ride. My theory is that the max lift setting on the NHT gives a harsh ride... More controlled but it beats the truck to death and I don't want more rattles and squeaks. 

The description of the NHT package says it has different shock valving, I think everything else is the same (except the rear springs) so I don't see a need for a separate part number. 

 

Did you do any towing with the stock shocks vs the 5100's?  I only have 500 miles on mine and haven't towed yet, but I cant imagine the bouncy feeling getting better with load.  I think the firmer ride would be an OK trade for towing vs the bouncy/bucking feeling.

michigan2500hd Senior Enthusiast

michigan2500hd

Posted
Posted

Last I checked Bilstein says the shocks are for all 1500's except NHT. Not sure why though. Yes I trailered with the stock shocks before switching and the Bilsteins are a big improvement. No sway and less bucking.
I mainly pull a 14' enclosed tool trailer so we're not talking crazy weight. Pulled a trailer type 40' lift but not sure how heavy it was.. But it was a chunk of metal for sure.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Kubs Enthusiast

Kubs

Posted
Posted

Thanks for your input and review!

Red_5 Enthusiast

Red_5

Posted
Posted
On 4/16/2018 at 7:36 AM, Kubs said:

I read through a lot of this topic, but not all.  I see mostly people replacing the Rancho Z71 shocks with the Bilsteins, but I didn't see anyone compare them to the NHT Max Trailering factory shocks.  I have has my '18 for a little more than a week now, and it seems a little bit bouncy.  I have not towed with it yet, but feel it may not be able to control weight all that well.  I dont know, maybe it gets better with some weight.

 

Anyone change out your factory NHT shocks for the 5100's and feel the change was worth it?  Any towing comparisons?

Somewhere in this terribly long thread there's some info on which shock is best for NHT trucks. I brought it up at least a year ago but I can't remember which was recommended. I was hoping to get the 6112 if I'm remembering correctly but don't think they'll ever be released. Now I'm thinking about selling the truck so  . . .

Kubs Enthusiast

Kubs

Posted
Posted

I did some more reading through here and saw some posts about NHT owners upgrading to 5100s.  It seems that most people are pleased with the results.  The ones who didn't appeared to have too much sag, stacking lift kits, etc. all things that probably created their own issues. 

 

I also saw old screen shots from web sites saying the 5100's were for all except NHT.  However on TireRack, Amazon, and even Bilstein's own website there is no mention of these not being applicable for NHT equipped trucks.  Perhaps something changed in the shock, or Bilstein has done more testing, but it doesn't appear to be an issue any more.

 

I am going to go ahead and purchase them based on what I have been able to find. I also bought some Firestone Ride-Rite air springs to assist the load in the rear.  I currently tow an 18' open car trailer, but it is all steel.  That with the race car on it, spare tires, fuel is around 7000lbs.  Then I put a bunch of tools, cooler, more fuel, etc in the bed which is probably close to another 1000lbs. 

 

I had a 2000 3/4 ton Yukon before this and it handled the weight no problem, but rode rough and got terrible fuel mileage.  It got to the point I didnt feel safe having the kids in it (old and wearing out) which is why I bought the '18 1500 NHT.  Same tow rating as the Yukon but better ride and mileage.  Th bouncy feeling does not give me confidence towing with any weight.

Kubs Enthusiast

Kubs

Posted
Posted

Amazon Prime is a wonderful thing! Got these yesterday, but don't know how soon my helper and I will be able to install them.

IMG_20180419_163217055.thumb.jpg.082fb4cc86d725f5e7b84638ab2f9c1f.jpg

  • Like 2
michigan2500hd Senior Enthusiast

michigan2500hd

Posted
Posted

Cool! Always thought the 5100 was a nice looking shock. It's a quick ,easy swap. Did mine in about 10 minds per side.. With less than optimal tools. Rachet broke so I was using wrenches. 

I was going to swap back to my stockers this morning  ( just to compare)but I think they are shot. When I let one fully extend it makes a metallic sound. Thinking about giving Monroe Sensi- Trac a try. I think the Bilsteins are too harsh. I'll see if it's just me this way. 

FHLH Enthusiast

FHLH

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, michigan2500hd said:

Cool! Always thought the 5100 was a nice looking shock. It's a quick ,easy swap. Did mine in about 10 minds per side.. With less than optimal tools. Rachet broke so I was using wrenches. 

I was going to swap back to my stockers this morning  ( just to compare)but I think they are shot. When I let one fully extend it makes a metallic sound. Thinking about giving Monroe Sensi- Trac a try. I think the Bilsteins are too harsh. I'll see if it's just me this way. 

4

Monroe / Rancho same thing... how long have you had the 5100's they do 'soften' after some miles

michigan2500hd Senior Enthusiast

michigan2500hd

Posted
Posted

Had the Bilsteins on for about 15,000 miles with no noticable softening it breaking in. 

I think the Rancho shocks that come as OEM Z71 are made to GM's specs and not what you'd buy off the shelf. The stock shocks I took off were Tenneco I think.  

sledwrencher Enthusiast

sledwrencher

Posted
Posted

I'm not seeing the 5100 adjustable shocks for the front of the 2018's  Not on Bilstein website or Summit or others?  Anyone using them to level an '18?  Part number??

 

Thanks in advance!!

jimmyboy8301 Senior Enthusiast

jimmyboy8301

Posted
Posted
I'm not seeing the 5100 adjustable shocks for the front of the 2018's  Not on Bilstein website or Summit or others?  Anyone using them to level an '18?  Part number??
 
Thanks in advance!!

24238304


2017 Chevy Silverado LTZ Z71 6.2L
4.5" Zone
22x10 American Force Grips
33x12.5 Nitto Ridge Grapplers
Instagram @wildchevys

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,693 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Coastie05
      Replacing 2.7L on 2021 Silverado with 2023 2.7L

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • MASONV88888888
      Another 6.2L engine failure!

      By MASONV88888888 · Posted

      My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • MASONV88888888
      Rattle in the rear!

      By MASONV88888888 · Posted

      Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • Buckwild27
      Gas Prices

      By Buckwild27 · Posted

      I have 2 choices. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...