Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Full retail for a full set of Fox 2.5's is $2290:  https://www.ridefox.com/filter.php?m=truck&p=&make=Chevrolet&model=Silverado+1500&year=2018-2007&position=ALL

 

$1500 would be one heck of a sale.  The Falcons are also available cheaper if you shop around (though not a 45% discount).  I was pointing out another choice in a similar price range of those looking for 6112's.   If everybody waiting for the 6112's was willing to spend the money on Fox 2.5's, they'd have them already.

Posted
Full retail for a full set of Fox 2.5's is $2290:  https://www.ridefox.com/filter.php?m=truck&p=&make=Chevrolet&model=Silverado+1500&year=2018-2007&position=ALL
 
$1500 would be one heck of a sale.  The Falcons are also available cheaper if you shop around (though not a 45% discount).  I was pointing out another choice in a similar price range of those looking for 6112's.   If everybody waiting for the 6112's was willing to spend the money on Fox 2.5's, they'd have them already.


Ah yes, if you go full blown they aren't cheap :D

I was more thinking the entry level 2.5s that are a bit cheaper: https://www.americantrucks.com/chv-fox-25-factory-coilover-ifp-shocks-3in-lift-fr-0717.html?utm_content=AT%20Handling%20-%20Shock/Strut%7CFOX&T5_Var4=S100575&utm_campaign=ATS+Silverado+Vehicle+Medium&dialogtech=ppc&utm_source=google-pla&utm_medium=shopping&T5_Var2=shopping&T5_Var3=silver&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIt7Gg3Jj13AIViv5kCh0r6gyEEAQYASABEgLhXvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

But yes I'm sure if there was a sale on the Falcons they'd be a viable option.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Jon A said:

Full retail for a full set of Fox 2.5's is $2290:  https://www.ridefox.com/filter.php?m=truck&p=&make=Chevrolet&model=Silverado+1500&year=2018-2007&position=ALL

 

$1500 would be one heck of a sale.  The Falcons are also available cheaper if you shop around (though not a 45% discount).  I was pointing out another choice in a similar price range of those looking for 6112's.   If everybody waiting for the 6112's was willing to spend the money on Fox 2.5's, they'd have them already.

 

I’ve given up on Bilstein and will be going the Fox or Icon route

 

Do both the Icon and Fox require an aftermarket UCA or can you get by using the factory...then possibly changing it out at a later date. I know “why not change it while in there”....just thinking of viable options with these two 

 

 

49263490-4F4D-4F12-82BF-34A7DEF4E727.jpeg

29A46CF2-6790-45DB-988C-9455E674B748.jpeg

Edited by WVU
Posted (edited)
On 2/25/2018 at 2:21 PM, jgraves13 said:

Anyone able to fit 285/75/r17 with these on the highest setting? Debating between 285/70 and 285/75


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

285/70/17 bfg k02

5100 on 3rd setting for 1.5” front lift. Rear stock block. Still have 1 - 1.5” of rake which I like for hooking up trailer or small load in back. 

 

I have about 250 - 300 lbs of tires and bed cover in pic. 

B0114CC5-C988-4F70-8604-4178DF879CE4.jpeg

Edited by 2009GMC
Posted
Looks good!  If you want to get rid of the squat, the Firestone Ride-Rite assist air springs I put on mine are great (3 posts up)!  The kit was less than $400 and comes with everything you need.  I had the springs in and shocks replaced in about 1.5 hours.
I have this kid installed as well and 4 years after the initial install I have never had a problem no air leaks it works great

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Posted

Let me ask this, are people dropping $2-3000 in shocks because they actually utilize them to their full potential or is it purely a bragging rights thing because there is absolutely no way in hell I could ever justify dropping that kind of coin just to level a truck that sees 99% highway time. Or is it just internet hype where people believe that since they are more expensive they’ve gotta be the best and so people buy them not realizing that they are just throwing good money away on what may be a marginal increase in ride quality?


2014 z71 LTZ
Volant Intake
Borla Exhaust
Diablo

Posted

Let me ask this, are people dropping $2-3000 in shocks because they actually utilize them to their full potential or is it purely a bragging rights thing because there is absolutely no way in hell I could ever justify dropping that kind of coin just to level a truck that sees 99% highway time. Or is it just internet hype where people believe that since they are more expensive they’ve gotta be the best and so people buy them not realizing that they are just throwing good money away on what may be a marginal increase in ride quality?


2014 z71 LTZ
Volant Intake
Borla Exhaust
Diablo

Posted

Spurshot, a member here, put King Shocks on his All Terrain.  Uses it for trekking to his hunting or fishing camp through a considerable amount of rutted out roads.  Another member from Mexico has Fox shocks and goes off the beaten path as well.  From experience some major roads south of the border can be similar to a farm to market back road needing major work here at home.

For how I drive daily and infrequent trips to ranches, Bilstein shocks and Toyo RTs fit the bill.  If I drove through those same ranch roads/trails every day I would probably have gone the King/Fox/Halo Lifts route.

YMMV

Posted
4 hours ago, Centex14 said:

Let me ask this, are people dropping $2-3000 in shocks because they actually utilize them to their full potential or is it purely a bragging rights thing because there is absolutely no way in hell I could ever justify dropping that kind of coin just to level a truck that sees 99% highway time. Or is it just internet hype where people believe that since they are more expensive they’ve gotta be the best and so people buy them not realizing that they are just throwing good money away on what may be a marginal increase in ride quality?

Money spent on shocks is some of the best money one can spend on a truck.  The ride and handling improvements (even on highway) a really good set of shocks can provide is quite transformative.  In my opinion, most people short themselves by being way too cheap with shocks.  They won't think twice about spending $2000 on a set of wheels and other bling items because they like the looks but don't add any actual performance, and keep their $50 factory shocks or only upgrade to a set of $100 shocks.  Completely backward IMHO.

Posted
On 8/18/2018 at 7:21 AM, Sierra Dan said:

Anyone seen these?  $999 for the front pair, $799 for rear pair.   

https://www.roughcountry.com/shocks-struts/shocks/vertex-shocks.html?vehicle_drive=3&vehicle_make=7

 

image.jpeg.20f87130bb3e9910154ca5f86de1756c.jpegimage.jpeg.b468d7f74c529d5c8537c38562073245.jpeg

 

Until a few days ago I had never heard of them.  With shocks I look for quality, and RC isn't typically a name that jumps out and inspires quality to me.  However, it's probable they're having the shocks made by a 3rd party for them, so it's certainly possible they're a good shock.  The specs look good (though I'd like to know more about their valving), I hope they're good as more choices is always better for all of us.  But personally I'd wait for more info on them (comparisons by those who have had other high quality shocks in the past).

 

Posted
Spurshot, a member here, put King Shocks on his All Terrain.  Uses it for trekking to his hunting or fishing camp through a considerable amount of rutted out roads.  Another member from Mexico has Fox shocks and goes off the beaten path as well.  From experience some major roads south of the border can be similar to a farm to market back road needing major work here at home.
For how I drive daily and infrequent trips to ranches, Bilstein shocks and Toyo RTs fit the bill.  If I drove through those same ranch roads/trails every day I would probably have gone the King/Fox/Halo Lifts route.
YMMV


That kind of driving I get it. I’d do the same.

Money spent on shocks is some of the best money one can spend on a truck.  The ride and handling improvements (even on highway) a really good set of shocks can provide is quite transformative.  In my opinion, most people short themselves by being way too cheap with shocks.  They won't think twice about spending $2000 on a set of wheels and other bling items because they like the looks but don't add any actual performance, and keep their $50 factory shocks or only upgrade to a set of $100 shocks.  Completely backward IMHO.


Dropping $2-3000 for shocks for daily driving on the highway is an insane waste of money. You aren’t even beginning to utilize any of the benefits of those shocks. I’d bet a $100 that you could find a shock that rides as good as the Fox shocks on the highway for half the price. Dropping $2-3000 on shocks and driving on the highway is akin to putting an 80” tv in a closet. Great bragging rights but a senseless waste of money.



2014 z71 LTZ
Volant Intake
Borla Exhaust
Diablo
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Centex14 said:

Dropping $2-3000 for shocks for daily driving on the highway is an insane waste of money.

Spending $50K on a truck for daily driving on the highway in the first place is where the "insane waste of money" is.  If that's what you did you'd be much better off with a sedan or crossover.

4 hours ago, Centex14 said:

You aren’t even beginning to utilize any of the benefits of those shocks.

 

How the hell do you think you know what I use my truck for?  My current shock setup (ICON front coilovers, Bilstein 5165 Rears--less than $2000 total) rides better, handles better and adds much safety when towing:

 

IMAG1863.jpg

 

And is a fantastic improvement Offroad:

 

DSC_2913.jpg

 

You specifically asked about highway driving, so that's the question I answered.  The shocks I chose are a fantastic improvement there as well (both digressive valved).  The biggest improvement is noticed at higher speeds on bad roads (especially when hauling cargo), where large bumps, dips, "whoops" cause a truck with the stock suspension to bounce around, feel unsettled and unsafe; the chassis still bouncing up and down several times as it recovers from a bump or a dip when it encounters the next one.  A good setup like mine not only smoothes out the ride over such stuff dramatically but keeps the chassis well planted and in control--a "solid" feeling you just can't get with cheap shocks.  Similar improvement in corners and during braking.

4 hours ago, Centex14 said:

I’d bet a $100 that you could find a shock that rides as good as the Fox shocks on the highway for half the price.

 

Again, false.  I've actually had the stock Ranchos and then Bilstein 5100's on this truck and done all the same things with it that I have with my "next level" setup so I've felt first hand the improvements at each stage.  There was a significant improvement from one stage to the next.  One worth every penny.

 

By your statement, it's clear you've never experienced just how good a vehicle can be with a really good set of shocks.  Otherwise you'd know the real waste of money is spending $50K on a truck and then driving it around on cheap, crappy shocks its entire life.

 

 

Edited by Jon A
  • Like 2
Posted

Jon A,

 

Did you stick with the stock UCA when running your icons in the front or did you replace with an aftermarket?

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 387 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...