Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Full retail for a full set of Fox 2.5's is $2290:  https://www.ridefox.com/filter.php?m=truck&p=&make=Chevrolet&model=Silverado+1500&year=2018-2007&position=ALL

 

$1500 would be one heck of a sale.  The Falcons are also available cheaper if you shop around (though not a 45% discount).  I was pointing out another choice in a similar price range of those looking for 6112's.   If everybody waiting for the 6112's was willing to spend the money on Fox 2.5's, they'd have them already.

Posted
Full retail for a full set of Fox 2.5's is $2290:  https://www.ridefox.com/filter.php?m=truck&p=&make=Chevrolet&model=Silverado+1500&year=2018-2007&position=ALL
 
$1500 would be one heck of a sale.  The Falcons are also available cheaper if you shop around (though not a 45% discount).  I was pointing out another choice in a similar price range of those looking for 6112's.   If everybody waiting for the 6112's was willing to spend the money on Fox 2.5's, they'd have them already.


Ah yes, if you go full blown they aren't cheap :D

I was more thinking the entry level 2.5s that are a bit cheaper: https://www.americantrucks.com/chv-fox-25-factory-coilover-ifp-shocks-3in-lift-fr-0717.html?utm_content=AT%20Handling%20-%20Shock/Strut%7CFOX&T5_Var4=S100575&utm_campaign=ATS+Silverado+Vehicle+Medium&dialogtech=ppc&utm_source=google-pla&utm_medium=shopping&T5_Var2=shopping&T5_Var3=silver&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIt7Gg3Jj13AIViv5kCh0r6gyEEAQYASABEgLhXvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

But yes I'm sure if there was a sale on the Falcons they'd be a viable option.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Jon A said:

Full retail for a full set of Fox 2.5's is $2290:  https://www.ridefox.com/filter.php?m=truck&p=&make=Chevrolet&model=Silverado+1500&year=2018-2007&position=ALL

 

$1500 would be one heck of a sale.  The Falcons are also available cheaper if you shop around (though not a 45% discount).  I was pointing out another choice in a similar price range of those looking for 6112's.   If everybody waiting for the 6112's was willing to spend the money on Fox 2.5's, they'd have them already.

 

I’ve given up on Bilstein and will be going the Fox or Icon route

 

Do both the Icon and Fox require an aftermarket UCA or can you get by using the factory...then possibly changing it out at a later date. I know “why not change it while in there”....just thinking of viable options with these two 

 

 

49263490-4F4D-4F12-82BF-34A7DEF4E727.jpeg

29A46CF2-6790-45DB-988C-9455E674B748.jpeg

Edited by WVU
Posted (edited)
On 2/25/2018 at 2:21 PM, jgraves13 said:

Anyone able to fit 285/75/r17 with these on the highest setting? Debating between 285/70 and 285/75


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

285/70/17 bfg k02

5100 on 3rd setting for 1.5” front lift. Rear stock block. Still have 1 - 1.5” of rake which I like for hooking up trailer or small load in back. 

 

I have about 250 - 300 lbs of tires and bed cover in pic. 

B0114CC5-C988-4F70-8604-4178DF879CE4.jpeg

Edited by 2009GMC
Posted
Looks good!  If you want to get rid of the squat, the Firestone Ride-Rite assist air springs I put on mine are great (3 posts up)!  The kit was less than $400 and comes with everything you need.  I had the springs in and shocks replaced in about 1.5 hours.
I have this kid installed as well and 4 years after the initial install I have never had a problem no air leaks it works great

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Posted

Let me ask this, are people dropping $2-3000 in shocks because they actually utilize them to their full potential or is it purely a bragging rights thing because there is absolutely no way in hell I could ever justify dropping that kind of coin just to level a truck that sees 99% highway time. Or is it just internet hype where people believe that since they are more expensive they’ve gotta be the best and so people buy them not realizing that they are just throwing good money away on what may be a marginal increase in ride quality?


2014 z71 LTZ
Volant Intake
Borla Exhaust
Diablo

Posted

Let me ask this, are people dropping $2-3000 in shocks because they actually utilize them to their full potential or is it purely a bragging rights thing because there is absolutely no way in hell I could ever justify dropping that kind of coin just to level a truck that sees 99% highway time. Or is it just internet hype where people believe that since they are more expensive they’ve gotta be the best and so people buy them not realizing that they are just throwing good money away on what may be a marginal increase in ride quality?


2014 z71 LTZ
Volant Intake
Borla Exhaust
Diablo

Posted

Spurshot, a member here, put King Shocks on his All Terrain.  Uses it for trekking to his hunting or fishing camp through a considerable amount of rutted out roads.  Another member from Mexico has Fox shocks and goes off the beaten path as well.  From experience some major roads south of the border can be similar to a farm to market back road needing major work here at home.

For how I drive daily and infrequent trips to ranches, Bilstein shocks and Toyo RTs fit the bill.  If I drove through those same ranch roads/trails every day I would probably have gone the King/Fox/Halo Lifts route.

YMMV

Posted
4 hours ago, Centex14 said:

Let me ask this, are people dropping $2-3000 in shocks because they actually utilize them to their full potential or is it purely a bragging rights thing because there is absolutely no way in hell I could ever justify dropping that kind of coin just to level a truck that sees 99% highway time. Or is it just internet hype where people believe that since they are more expensive they’ve gotta be the best and so people buy them not realizing that they are just throwing good money away on what may be a marginal increase in ride quality?

Money spent on shocks is some of the best money one can spend on a truck.  The ride and handling improvements (even on highway) a really good set of shocks can provide is quite transformative.  In my opinion, most people short themselves by being way too cheap with shocks.  They won't think twice about spending $2000 on a set of wheels and other bling items because they like the looks but don't add any actual performance, and keep their $50 factory shocks or only upgrade to a set of $100 shocks.  Completely backward IMHO.

Posted
On 8/18/2018 at 7:21 AM, Sierra Dan said:

Anyone seen these?  $999 for the front pair, $799 for rear pair.   

https://www.roughcountry.com/shocks-struts/shocks/vertex-shocks.html?vehicle_drive=3&vehicle_make=7

 

image.jpeg.20f87130bb3e9910154ca5f86de1756c.jpegimage.jpeg.b468d7f74c529d5c8537c38562073245.jpeg

 

Until a few days ago I had never heard of them.  With shocks I look for quality, and RC isn't typically a name that jumps out and inspires quality to me.  However, it's probable they're having the shocks made by a 3rd party for them, so it's certainly possible they're a good shock.  The specs look good (though I'd like to know more about their valving), I hope they're good as more choices is always better for all of us.  But personally I'd wait for more info on them (comparisons by those who have had other high quality shocks in the past).

 

Posted
Spurshot, a member here, put King Shocks on his All Terrain.  Uses it for trekking to his hunting or fishing camp through a considerable amount of rutted out roads.  Another member from Mexico has Fox shocks and goes off the beaten path as well.  From experience some major roads south of the border can be similar to a farm to market back road needing major work here at home.
For how I drive daily and infrequent trips to ranches, Bilstein shocks and Toyo RTs fit the bill.  If I drove through those same ranch roads/trails every day I would probably have gone the King/Fox/Halo Lifts route.
YMMV


That kind of driving I get it. I’d do the same.

Money spent on shocks is some of the best money one can spend on a truck.  The ride and handling improvements (even on highway) a really good set of shocks can provide is quite transformative.  In my opinion, most people short themselves by being way too cheap with shocks.  They won't think twice about spending $2000 on a set of wheels and other bling items because they like the looks but don't add any actual performance, and keep their $50 factory shocks or only upgrade to a set of $100 shocks.  Completely backward IMHO.


Dropping $2-3000 for shocks for daily driving on the highway is an insane waste of money. You aren’t even beginning to utilize any of the benefits of those shocks. I’d bet a $100 that you could find a shock that rides as good as the Fox shocks on the highway for half the price. Dropping $2-3000 on shocks and driving on the highway is akin to putting an 80” tv in a closet. Great bragging rights but a senseless waste of money.



2014 z71 LTZ
Volant Intake
Borla Exhaust
Diablo
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Centex14 said:

Dropping $2-3000 for shocks for daily driving on the highway is an insane waste of money.

Spending $50K on a truck for daily driving on the highway in the first place is where the "insane waste of money" is.  If that's what you did you'd be much better off with a sedan or crossover.

4 hours ago, Centex14 said:

You aren’t even beginning to utilize any of the benefits of those shocks.

 

How the hell do you think you know what I use my truck for?  My current shock setup (ICON front coilovers, Bilstein 5165 Rears--less than $2000 total) rides better, handles better and adds much safety when towing:

 

IMAG1863.jpg

 

And is a fantastic improvement Offroad:

 

DSC_2913.jpg

 

You specifically asked about highway driving, so that's the question I answered.  The shocks I chose are a fantastic improvement there as well (both digressive valved).  The biggest improvement is noticed at higher speeds on bad roads (especially when hauling cargo), where large bumps, dips, "whoops" cause a truck with the stock suspension to bounce around, feel unsettled and unsafe; the chassis still bouncing up and down several times as it recovers from a bump or a dip when it encounters the next one.  A good setup like mine not only smoothes out the ride over such stuff dramatically but keeps the chassis well planted and in control--a "solid" feeling you just can't get with cheap shocks.  Similar improvement in corners and during braking.

4 hours ago, Centex14 said:

I’d bet a $100 that you could find a shock that rides as good as the Fox shocks on the highway for half the price.

 

Again, false.  I've actually had the stock Ranchos and then Bilstein 5100's on this truck and done all the same things with it that I have with my "next level" setup so I've felt first hand the improvements at each stage.  There was a significant improvement from one stage to the next.  One worth every penny.

 

By your statement, it's clear you've never experienced just how good a vehicle can be with a really good set of shocks.  Otherwise you'd know the real waste of money is spending $50K on a truck and then driving it around on cheap, crappy shocks its entire life.

 

 

Edited by Jon A
  • Like 2
Posted

Jon A,

 

Did you stick with the stock UCA when running your icons in the front or did you replace with an aftermarket?

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So after reading the reveal from Chevrolet, I kept asking myself...why did the trim levels change?   Here are the official ones:   Work Truck (WT): The quintessential fleet truck, built with durable, easy-to-clean interiors for commercial or utilitarian use. Custom: A stylish, road-oriented trim that adds a more refined appearance, standard dual exhaust, and modern exterior styling. Custom Trail Boss: An entry-level off-roader featuring a 2-inch factory suspension lift and 34-inch mud-terrain tires on a budget. Silverado: Serving as the new base consumer truck (replacing the previous LT trim), it comes standard with the Z71 off-road package when equipped with 4WD. Trail Boss: Steps up the off-road hardware with the 2-inch lift, 34-inch tires, monotube shocks, an exclusive off-road hood, and more premium interior options. ZR2: The flagship off-roader. It boasts 35-inch mud-terrain tires, Multimatic DSSV dampers, front and rear electronic lockers, forged carbon-fiber interior accents, and an available hardcore Bison Edition (co-developed with AEV). High Country: The pinnacle of luxury. It replaces bright chrome with modern satin chrome, 22-inch wheels, premium leather, real wood interior trim, a panoramic sunroof, and an exclusive front-passenger touchscreen. As others have stated, why would you want a Silverado - 'Silverado' - wth?? LT needs to remain!!!   Also, there will no longer be a dedicated Z71 model.  All 4x4 trucks will have the Z71 package. Carplay is also something that cannot be removed.  Hopefully it will remain.     I am excited about the 5.7L V8 (350 C.I.D.)  Old school Chevy power.  My only concern is whatever version of AFM/DFM cylinder deactivation.  Too bad that isn't an option a buyer can choose to have or not.   I will definitely be stopping by my local dealership when these trucks start showing up.
    • I haven't seen diesel for less than $5.30 anywhere in my area
    • The not as clean as one would assume theme with the new engine oil, that reminds me of comments over the years with mechanics not always being so on board with filling an oil filter, not from the center anyway due to that typically being the clean side of the filter, danger of some contaminant falling into the filter if not careful but the realization now that the oil may not be as pure as one had assumed it would surely be. Yes it would be possible to fill from the small holes but that means messing with something to prop open the anti drain back valve if the filter is so equipped and not damage that valve in the process. Me, I have hardly ever prefilled an engine oil filter however I have prefilled diesel fuel filters with a filter on a fuel bulk tank and for anyone that has messed with diesel engines with filters and units that have a limited or no way of priming them, putting on a dry filter is a bad day to say the least with those crappy systems. But anyway back to not so clean engine oil, indeed perhaps its not so bad after all that I have not made a practice of prefilling oil filters.    As Grumpy Bear commented on keeping things clean, that I really have to wonder what the typical practice is at a dealer or any other shop that changes engine oil, do they make sure to wipe or wash off the oil plug and certainly if it fell into some gunk or onto a dirty floor, or that they wiped the filter mounting flange and didn't go and use some dirty rag and end up adding dirt to the inside of the head of the filter mount. Or be careless in how they stored or handled the new filter and if they were bumping into items under the vehicle with the filter opening facing up and having dirt drop right into the filter and if so right into the threaded center that is on the clean side. The top side, did they clean away the built up gunk that may be around the filler before removing the cap or to be really careful at that point that something right close to the filler hole that was hidden under the caps flange won't fall into the engine. Or did they clean the funnel or was that just laying there covered in oil from the oil change before and dust kicked up from sweeping the floor stuck to the oil and now that will go running into the next persons engine due to just not cleaning the funnel as "they won't know anyway" attitude as that young guy is more worried about taking a break so he can go outside and smoke a joint. Just random points that came to mind when I think about what some hired personnel may do that the shop foreman has no idea of or perhaps the whole attitude of some shops may be "eh ... who cares, they will never know the difference anyway".  
    • $3.69 for 87 octane.   $4.24 for Diesel in town.
    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...