Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Guys can we keep cluster sales relegated to the for sale section please? Would like to keep this thread related to questions etc. Thanks! 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, GTPprix said:

Guys can we keep cluster sales relegated to the for sale section please? Would like to keep this thread related to questions etc. Thanks! 

GTPprix,

 

I have a 2016 Silverado LTZ. I saw that some 2016 Suburbans/Tahoe's had the Denali-like cluster, which had the correct Chevy "blue" color instead of the GMC red?  If I could find one of these Suburban/Tahoe clusters would they work in a 2016 Silverado?

Posted

Chris,

 

This has probably already been asked but is there any way to get a "Chevy Blue" cluster into a 2015?

I really want to do this but don't want the GMC Red on the cluster while all the rest of my lights are blue.  I think the Tahoe/Sub didn't start offering this cluster until 2016.

Posted
1 hour ago, GTPprix said:

Yes we still need to confirm fitment however prior to purchase. 

Gotcha.  This (a Suburban/Tahoe model) is the only way to get a Chevy color cluster in a 2016, correct? Do you happen to know if part # 84254166  would be correct?

Posted (edited)

Please keep all of this stuff to email; thank you! :)

 

Edited by GTPprix
Posted
5 hours ago, GTPprix said:

Guys can we keep cluster sales relegated to the for sale section please? Would like to keep this thread related to questions etc. Thanks! 

My bad.  I have to find the for sale section again.  I'll direct my sale there. 

Posted

Does anyone have any idea what part number a Denali cluster from a 2015.5 diesel would be?

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

Posted

I’ not sure of a part number for a diesel but I have a Denali cluster for sale that came off a 2015.5. It’s listed in the for sale section. You can email GTXprix through his website on the days he accepts he emails and ask him if the part number I have for sale will work.

21 minutes ago, calgator73 said:

Does anyone have any idea what part number a Denali cluster from a 2015.5 diesel would be?

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
 

 

Posted
I’ not sure of a part number for a diesel but I have a Denali cluster for sale that came off a 2015.5. It’s listed in the for sale section. You can email GTXprix through his website on the days he accepts he emails and ask him if the part number I have for sale will work.
 

It won’t. Again guys please email this thread is becoming very hard to navigate. Thanks!
Posted
9 minutes ago, GTPprix said:


It won’t. Again guys please email this thread is becoming very hard to navigate. Thanks!

Sorry to bother you again, I know you're extremely busy with this.  What's the email address and hours/days you can accept emails?  Thanks, I really appreciate it.

Posted
42 minutes ago, calgator73 said:

Does anyone have any idea what part number a Denali cluster from a 2015.5 diesel would be?

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
 

See Page 29 of this post.

 

6 minutes ago, bkesting said:

Sorry to bother you again, I know you're extremely busy with this.  What's the email address and hours/days you can accept emails?  Thanks, I really appreciate it.

www.whiteautoandmedia.com

 

Here is the copy/paste for inquiries.  The email submission is by completing the form on the site.

 

http://whiteautoandmedia.com/index.php?option=com_contact&view=contact&id=1&Itemid=56

 

Hours of Operation: **SATURDAY AND SUNDAY ONLY 10AM to 4PM Eastern** EMAILS SENT OUTSIDE OF BUSINESS HOURS WILL LIKELY NOT BE RECEIVED!
  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, pgamboa said:

See Page 29 of this post.

 

www.whiteautoandmedia.com

 

Here is the copy/paste for inquiries.  The email submission is by completing the form on the site.

 

http://whiteautoandmedia.com/index.php?option=com_contact&view=contact&id=1&Itemid=56

 

Hours of Operation: **SATURDAY AND SUNDAY ONLY 10AM to 4PM Eastern** EMAILS SENT OUTSIDE OF BUSINESS HOURS WILL LIKELY NOT BE RECEIVED!

Thank you

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...