Jump to content

***Alpine X110slv 10" Restyle Kit"


Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, TrillWill said:

There is the new restyle i209 with apple car play. My favorite stereo is always the nex model wich i have in my other nbs truck and every previous cars. But i feel like they are almost about the same when it comes to tuning with the restyle. I have my own tuning uploaded on the alpine connect app. I wish you wouldve been able to hear it. Im looking for a mosconi dsp at the moment. I currently have 2 sa-10 rev 3 with custom box and lifted back seats. Im intriguered to hear your system though

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

I looked at the new Restyle when they came out  however the price is way too high for what it is imo. I'm not sure which nex's you've had however this one has the "network" mode like the deh-80prs which lets you run a fully active front stage through the headunit as well as allows separate left and right adjustments and more crossover slopes which puts it slightly ahead of the Alpine tuning wise Imo.

 

My new system consists of Japanese version Alpine DLX-F30T ring radiator tweeters, ScanSpeak Revelator mids and a JL Audio 13TW5 powered by a JL Audio xd700/5v2. I'm adding the twk 88 so I can manipulate the software to get a band passed left minus right signal with 20+ milliseconds of delay for "proper" rear fill and will power that from an Alpine compact amp. 

 

Which Mosconi are you looking for? I have a new 4to6 as well as a 6to8 around here somewhere as well as a bunch of other gear i won't ever use. 

 

image.thumb.jpg.6d0676be0c97be9e5f2cf87d69e9f9fa.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Hey man sorry for late response. Im looking to swap my ct sound1400.1 to mosconi zero1. I want a mosconi v8 dsp. Ive had a few different nex models but i love the new dmh 5500 nex. Im actually working on swapping my system for a good spl system

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
    • Chris 21 I appreciate your constructive response. !!  😉😉😉   The 6.6 is gas.  Correct me if I’m wrong but by recalibrating the speedo you’re correcting the shift points of the transmission on these trucks.?.
    • That is a huge misconception.     Bigger does not always equal safer.  Modifying does not make it safer either, with exceptions.   Think of this.  Your truck in stock form is capable of emergency maneuvers, proper stopping distances, its handling is designed around the factory wheel/tire packages, etc.   37s and a lift?  Now you've affected your braking distances, handling and ride control.  You've raised your center of gravity higher.  Your front visibility is now obstructed more than stock, same for your rear.  Does it look cooler?  Yes.  Does it now work as good as it did from factory on road?  NO.       As for my mention of exceptions?  Say you had a sedan or crossover.  They typically come with all season tires.  If you swap out for a performance all season or a summer tire, you improve your car by lowering its stopping distance (better braking because of traction) and improve the handling (regular and emergency) of the vehicle.  That is an actually improving modification.  My old 2019 LD 1500, I ran UHP all season tires on 20in wheels in a factory offered size.  It improved all aspects of how it drove over the Duratracs it came with from the factory in the stock 18" tire.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...