Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Might be old news for some, but I couldn't find any documentation on it. With kids falling out of open doors these days, whenever I shift from park, the doors lock before fluid has time to fill the clutch packs.

 

If one is to pull the door handle to open the locked door, twice, it will unlock and allow occupants to fall out, while in gear or neutral. 

 

But no matter how many times you push the tailgate button to drop the gate with the truck in neutral with drivers door open or closed, it will not open. Making a person to go back to the cab and put it in park, just to open the gate. They aren't making these things for old farmers any longer. 

 

The lack of a manual gearbox was a big surprise. 

Posted
Might be old news for some, but I couldn't find any documentation on it. With kids falling out of open doors these days, whenever I shift from park, the doors lock before fluid has time to fill the clutch packs.
 
If one is to pull the door handle to open the locked door, twice, it will unlock and allow occupants to fall out, while in gear or neutral. 
 
But no matter how many times you push the tailgate button to drop the gate with the truck in neutral with drivers door open or closed, it will not open. Making a person to go back to the cab and put it in park, just to open the gate. They aren't making these things for old farmers any longer. 
 
The lack of a manual gearbox was a big surprise. 


From someone who “farms”: why wouldn’t you put the truck in park when you get off to open the tailgate?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Jav_eee said:

 


From someone who “farms”: why wouldn’t you put the truck in park when you get off to open the tailgate?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

Guess it's old school. Not so much getting out just to open the tailgate, but livestock gates, checking the rain gauge, checking the mailbox, checking pivots, opening up the shop doors, picking up irrigation pipe, checking the transmission fluid, etc.

 

Here, we have flat ground. Truck might roll 2 feet and stop. In 70 years I've never used park, unless it was for parking, not stopping. If it was rolling, set the parking brake. Use park when shutting engine off. 

 

Kinda like using the manuals. Engine running and stopped, shift out of gear, set parking brake if rolling, Parking with engine off, dump it into second gear.

 

You might not know, but ford had a phase in life that the autos would jump out of park, into reverse.

 

To each his own.

Posted

I found out LED headlights suck in snow. No heat is generated and you have to keep stopping to brush the snow off at night. This i really don't like.

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Duramaxsky said:

I found out LED headlights suck in snow. No heat is generated and you have to keep stopping to brush the snow off at night. This i really don't like.

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk
 

I was wondering about that! I haven't driven in those conditions yet, where you couldn't keep the windshield clear on max defrost, at anything over 40 mph.

 

Then throw in, following or meeting vehicles with that mist spray.

 

But "here", I drive more at night, when conditions are more favorable. I really like the led's for that.

 

It's always something, huh?

  • Like 1
Posted

 
You might not know, but ford had a phase in life that the autos would jump out of park, into reverse.
 
To each his own.


I actually know someone who was killed many many years back (way before cell phones) when his Chevy came out of park and pinned him between the truck and gate. He was found later that night.

That being said I still can’t figure out why neutral. Park is so much easier to shift into, I find it takes effort to hit the neutral notch. Guess you get better at it the more you use it. Like you said, to each their own!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Posted
On 12/20/2020 at 2:07 PM, Duramaxsky said:

Better fuel mileage had nothing to do with the choice. I would have bought a Ford if they had a more powerful engine that was not a mouse with a supercharger or turbo. I like big old school V8 power. I figured it likely got worse mileage than the 5.3. So that is dosen't is just a nice benefit. But I would have bought an F150 if the 5.3 was the biggest engine GM had. Not enough bigger than the 5.3 to buy the Chevy.

Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
 

I jumped from a 2010 5.3 to 6.2.  The 6.2 is more fuel efficient.  The only concern I have with it is the availability of premium fuel on some of my recreation routes.  Mostly 87 octane, regular unleaded is all available at gas stations.  I'm wondering if something like Lucas octane boost would be me 4 points with a 15oz bottle per 25 gallon fill up.  It is that or carry a lot of gas cans.  I had a bigger capacity tank in my older GM as well, which I prefer.

Posted
I jumped from a 2010 5.3 to 6.2.  The 6.2 is more fuel efficient.  The only concern I have with it is the availability of premium fuel on some of my recreation routes.  Mostly 87 octane, regular unleaded is all available at gas stations.  I'm wondering if something like Lucas octane boost would be me 4 points with a 15oz bottle per 25 gallon fill up.  It is that or carry a lot of gas cans.  I had a bigger capacity tank in my older GM as well, which I prefer.
I have never really seen that. Most stations have premium. When I got my Duramax in 03 diesel was a little hard to find
Now most stations have it.

Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk

Posted
25 minutes ago, Duramaxsky said:

I have never really seen that. Most stations have premium. When I got my Duramax in 03 diesel was a little hard to find
Now most stations have it.

Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
 

Just telling you my experience.  Rural, small town gas stations don't have 91 on pump in my area.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just telling you my experience.  Rural, small town gas stations don't have 91 on pump in my area.
Maybe things are different in the west. Here you need to be more worried about how far the exits are from each other. In UT MT and parts of ID you need to stop before it's too late. Another thing that sucks with our small tanks. Towns with stations can be close to 50 miles apart.

Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk

Posted

I use to live in Salt Lake City and would drive to Grants Pass, OR to visit extended family. My route had me get off I-80 and take over 200 miles of back roads, that even today doesn't have towns, gas stations, or even cell phone reception. Get off I-80 in Winnemucca, NV and head to Lakeview, OR. Back in the 80s there was a gas station in Denio, NV, and it was about midway between the 2 towns. That station is closed. And, because of Oregon's laws stating you can't pump your own gas, if you got to Lakeview, OR you were stuck until the gas station opened in the morning. I use to have a car that was limited to the distance, and I spent at least 1 winter night freezing my butt off in the car waiting for the gas station to open. I'm glad these trucks are capable of better mpg. Still, I make sure to top off the gas in Winnemucca just in case something happens. I've hit many big storms on this route, and helped many people who've become stranded. Oh, and the entire 200 miles is open range with no fencing. It's not uncommon to suddenly find a herd of cows in the middle of the highway in the middle of the night.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Posted
I use to live in Salt Lake City and would drive to Grants Pass, OR to visit extended family. My route had me get off I-80 and take over 200 miles of back roads, that even today doesn't have towns, gas stations, or even cell phone reception. Get off I-80 in Winnemucca, NV and head to Lakeview, OR. Back in the 80s there was a gas station in Denio, NV, and it was about midway between the 2 towns. That station is closed. And, because of Oregon's laws stating you can't pump your own gas, if you got to Lakeview, OR you were stuck until the gas station opened in the morning. I use to have a car that was limited to the distance, and I spent at least 1 winter night freezing my butt off in the car waiting for the gas station to open. I'm glad these trucks are capable of better mpg. Still, I make sure to top off the gas in Winnemucca just in case something happens. I've hit many big storms on this route, and helped many people who've become stranded. Oh, and the entire 200 miles is open range with no fencing. It's not uncommon to suddenly find a herd of cows in the middle of the highway in the middle of the night.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk


Even going north from Winnemucca it's a very long way to the next fuel stop. It's Jackpot. Last time I was there they were getting over $6 a gallon. But the next fuel is I 84 in Idaho. I took the new truck to Salt Lake last October towing my 30' trailer. I ran out on 84 just before Twin Falls. I knew that might happen so I had 5 gallons of premium in the bed. Also 5 gallons of ethanol free regular for the generator. I could use that if needed. But it wasn't. When I got to Twin Falls I filled the 5 gallons in the can incase I did it again. I have decided that truck sucks for towing. Small fuel tank is one reason. Bad fuel mileage is another. And it's just not nearly as stable as the old Duramax either. It's nicer and all but me and the little lady agree the old truck is better for long trips towing. It has a 45 gallon transfer flow tank in place of the stock one and another 12 in the bed with a pump to move it to the main tank while driving. It will make it from Seattle to Twin Falls on that easy. It took 3 tanks and the 5 in the new truck. Then it didn't make it to SLC from there. The old one makes it there with over half a tank left and not needing the tank in the bed. And it handles the 80 MPH speed limits in ID and UT better. Much more stable and less loss of fuel mileage due to the higher speed. The 6.2 has plenty of power though. I was surprised how well it pulled up Cabbage out of Pendleton OR. Almost as well as the Duramax. I didn't expect that.

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 281 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Enjoy the new truck, it’s a beauty. I’m glad you’re keeping the OBS, I love those old trucks. 
    • With large equipment or deep mud it is more of a use the higher gear to avoid spinning tires, getting stuck because of spinning tires and doing damage to your machine. The idea is if you run out of torque before you spin tires you can still downshift for more torque. If you are just spinning your tires in the lowest available gear you are stuck and things break.   Automatic transmissions, traction control and electronic transfer cases change the calculation a little as you the driver have less control over each piece. 
    • are there any codes? with lots of rust, perhaps disconnect/clean both sides of the connection/examine cable ends (the wires) for corrosion going into the sheath & replace if necessary/reconnect ALL the power AND ground cables between the battery, engine, frame, cab, fuse box and starter charm.li (website) has a no-start diagnostic procedure you can work through to get it working.
    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...