Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, J-man67 said:

150k and stock bearings.  I have them ready to go as I know I'm getting close.  I'm extremely pleased with this truck.  She hasn't had an easy life and it's holding up just fine!

Hey Justin,

Good to hear from someone who hasn't had issues with that mileage.

Could you give some more details on your truck?

Interested in oil change intervals you did.

Oil and filter used.

Did you use Top Tier gas?

Did you use fuel system cleaners like Techron?

Catch Can?

 

:)

 

 

 

 

Posted

210,000 on my 04 that I bought brand new. 6 inch lift with 35's and still on the original bearings. Lift has been on since 05.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Gb steel said:

210,000 on my 04 that I bought brand new. 6 inch lift with 35's and still on the original bearings. Lift has been on since 05.

 

Lol well you have an ‘04 which has no “bearing” (pun intended ?) on this thread since we are talking Mexican built post-bailout junkbox GM trucks not ‘04s when GM actually gave a sh*t

Posted

Since the earlier trucks were brought into this discussion...my 99 1/2 GMT800 2500 went about 110k before the left front bearing slowly failed.  I sold my 2008 1500 to my brother with 140k and it was fine.  My 2014 1500 has 65k and no signs of bearing problems.

 

IMO, ball and roller bearing failures of any kind are difficult to diagnose most of the time.  Especially a sealed bearing.  But a sealed bearing has only a finite amount of grease it uses and sooner or later that grease gets to a point where its lubricating ability is below what is necessary, no matter how good the bearing is made. The quality and quantity of grease has as much to do with the bearing longetivity as the bearing itself, IMO.

 

The other thing I noted on my trucks was that I could not hear a bearing in the early to mid stages of failure with off-road tires, since the noise frequency is similar.  The bearing had to be pretty loose before I could tell.  And my experience with the GMT800 was that it took place over more than several thousand miles.

Posted (edited)

2016 GMC Sierra Denali (6.2L) with 70k miles - still on stock wheel bearings with no issues. I've got a 2" level in the front, but everything else is stock. I'll be swapping out my entire suspension this weekend for a 2.5" lift in the front and 1" lift in the rear.

2008 Cadillac Escalade (6.2L) sold with 200k miles - only had to replace 1 wheel bearing around 150k miles and did it with Timken.

2007 GMC Envoy Denali (5.3L) sold with 175k miles - only had to replace 1 wheel bearing around 100k miles and did it with Timken.

 

You made a good choice in replacing with Timken. They make great stuff and I've never had an issue with them. Keep in mind though, there are so many factors that go into wheel bearings failing - road conditions, off-roading, wheel/tire set-up (if spacers are used), etc. If everything is stock and you don't beat up the truck on bad roads or off-road you should get 100-150k miles. But it's also not super uncommon to have one go bad between 50-100k. Like any mechanical part, some just fail prematurely. Sorry for your luck.

Edited by midwestdenaliguy
  • 6 months later...
Posted

Front left wheel bearing on order now to my local mom & pop shop, creating a hell of a racket in noise.  Only 40k miles. 

Posted
On 10/28/2018 at 8:11 AM, J-man67 said:

150k and stock bearings.  I have them ready to go as I know I'm getting close.  I'm extremely pleased with this truck.  She hasn't had an easy life and it's holding up just fine!

Which truck are you talking about your 07 or the 15?

Posted

I had to do them on our Canyon at 80,000km (50,000 miles.) I was pretty disappointed in the OEM quality having to do them that early on a pavement-pounder. But what can you expect, most of the parts these days are made in China using inferior steels, probably by a child. Build them cheaper and charge double, keep up the good work and you will be crying to be bailed out again soon. 

Posted

 I agree the quality may have gone down and all parts can fail.

But a wheel bearing is no big deal to me.

Beats motor or trans issues.

:)

Posted
Which truck are you talking about your 07 or the 15?

The 15, but 90k with 35s on the 07 and bearings never failed. 04 Colorado with 87k and 33s and they remained tight then too. That truck did not have an easy life. This picture was the first day I had it. Temporary tag was submerged once I pulled through that mess.  

As of this weekend everything in the front end of the 15 was silent. I started hearing some chatter/popping similar to the sound of a bad strut or shock. Thought, "well, those lasted longer than I expected." Took a quick look and saw the my drive side sway bar end link sheared off at the control arm. Picked up a new one yesterday and will install today. Back in business. 200k here I come!

 

 

 

7d6b3f8d047109845104a0c7299528a6.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

 

 

91d808aadcd1a2844bcbcccf34f64fdc.jpg

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...
Posted

The hardest part is loosening the 3 bolts that hold the assembly on. The are like 14 mm bolts but have only 15 mm heads for clearance to the drive shaft. Use a good socket ant try not to bugger them up. Use anti-sieze on everything and the next guy will appreciate you. You do need a 36 mm socket to listen your axle nut. Anti-sieze here to, but a drop of locktite for luck. Get the torque specs from 1A auto video.

  • Like 1
  • 5 months later...
Posted (edited)

2013 3500 DRW WT LML,  I am at 481,000 and my drivers side bearing started making noise today. All highway, 70% towing 8-16k lbs. Hope I can make it 500 miles back home.

Edited by Gdaddypops
Truck info added
  • Like 1
Posted

73k on my truck and no issues yet. Labor time should be no more than 1.5 hrs. Identifix says factory time is 1.5.

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

Posted

I have a theory on bearing failure on these so called "maintenance free" hubs.  Obviously on older vehicles where you had to pack grease at least everytime you did the brakes it kind of forced you to change them, inspect them or re-pack them and they lasted.  In the police fleet, we see some cars/trucks got 100,000 miles + on the original hubs without failure.  Some fail in as little as 15k.  This is with many sustained high speed runs in pursuits and just routine emergency response where speeds reach triple digit speeds multiple times just in one busy shift.

 

Now I know some designs are just faulty or at least less than desirable.  I think on average the GMT800 trucks showed higher than normal rates of failure compared to other vehicles than came before and after.  That being said, I'm convinced that duty cycle is a huge factor in bearing failure when there is no routine maintenance that can be performed.  In the police car world, I believe it comes down mostly to how many times and or how long the vehicle has been driven in water, mud, etc deep enough to submerge the hubs (which happens all the time on police cars believe it or not) over the life of that particular set of hubs.  Another factor is violent curb strikes, pot holes etc, rough roads, side loads from high speed cornering that occur during the life cycle of that particular hub or hubs.  

 

In trucks, all these same things can be variables with the addition of increased loads caused by larger wheels, tires, left kits etc.  When its just one side that fails, it could be a combo of duty cycle along with an extraordinary wheel strike on a curb, pothole or other road hazard, that you either don't know about because someone else was driving the vehicle, the vehicle was purchased used, or maybe you just forgot about that huge ladder you ran over on the highway 3 years ago that is just now catching up to your bearing hub?  

 

Not too different from someone that has engine failure 5 years and 100,000 miles later because jiffy lube started the engine without oil and let it run for 2 minutes before realizing their mistake, then filling it up with oil and sending it out the door with the customer none the wiser.  Engine is working fine at that moment but just lost 150,000 miles off its expected life...

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,008 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...