Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, got the leak after 7500 miles and 10 months owning it plus a collapsed lifter at 818 miles not to mention the DFM noise that constantly plaques me when driving this vehicle or the flashing strobe lights on my trailers that alert everyone to my trailers. So GM fix is silicone bead in between the rear window and metal. I’m including pics of the fix[emoji23] if you can call it that. So when silicone goes bad in so many days or years, then what? Will it be under warranty or will it be on the owner of the truck, which will not be me!! Sad that this kind of money, then to fix it with clear silicone. Didn’t even take the window out. [emoji30] just done with GM and there trucks after 30 years.

0d72585da63a01fb7845dfdaea9569d4.jpgd27b175285a168e87173feb5b31ad0a5.jpgef5717432c9359c58602d9b6313bf99b.jpge810051a76fbf04afe85d33cd83bb8b2.jpg8a9e180659222f69d443115833789bd4.jpg




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I have been following this thread in earnest.....and I got the leak today

 

2019 GMC Sierra

Build date 12/2018 - AFTER the supposed change - Ft Wayne plant

 

Going to have to call the dealer once service opens in the AM. Really hoping they don't try to get me to do the silicone caulk nonsense.

Posted
1 hour ago, Centrebaseball said:

I have been following this thread in earnest.....and I got the leak today

 

2019 GMC Sierra

Build date 12/2018 - AFTER the supposed change - Ft Wayne plant

 

Going to have to call the dealer once service opens in the AM. Really hoping they don't try to get me to do the silicone caulk nonsense.

They will! 

Posted

Well after my first sealing fix didn’t hold up at all, I’m happy to report my new glass was installed yesterday. Body shop guy was great and they did good work. Glass company leak tested it and cut window out to find that the window has three pieces sandwiched together and they were not right so in went the new glass.   Went through car wash today and not one drop. 

Good luck to all you guys that have this issue. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Well my 2019 early build leaker was replaced with 2020 hopefully not leaker. No signs of an leaks on the window or headliner of the 2020 so fingers crossed. Very impressed with the 10 speed after the first 50 miles.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

  • Like 6
Posted

Bought my 2019 GMC Sierra SLT in July of this year.  Last week my son was sitting in the backseat when we were on our way out to eat and said mommy why is the top of the seat wet?  I kind of brushed it off.  Then night before last it had rained before I came in to work so I checked it and sure enough all the way across the top it is leaking and the whole top of my leather seat had drops on it!! Took it to the dealer yesterday in Pensacola Florida and they said they had never heard of this!! Now after being on this forum I call bull $H!+!!  I am furious after spending what I did on this truck to only have it since July and have it leaking!!! Last GMC I will ever own!  Side note:  I traded in my 17 that had the infamous tranny problems!!! No more of these trucks for this family!!!!

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, dvhounddog said:

Bought my 2019 GMC Sierra SLT in July of this year.  Last week my son was sitting in the backseat when we were on our way out to eat and said mommy why is the top of the seat wet?  I kind of brushed it off.  Then night before last it had rained before I came in to work so I checked it and sure enough all the way across the top it is leaking and the whole top of my leather seat had drops on it!! Took it to the dealer yesterday in Pensacola Florida and they said they had never heard of this!! Now after being on this forum I call bull $H!+!!  I am furious after spending what I did on this truck to only have it since July and have it leaking!!! Last GMC I will ever own!  Side note:  I traded in my 17 that had the infamous tranny problems!!! No more of these trucks for this family!!!!

Don't the sliding rear windows in the Fords and Rams leak, too? 

Posted

Just a quick follow up. Called two dealers close to my house.  One said they couldn’t get me in to see anyone for 10 days. The other took me in that day and looked and ordered the sealant and headliner but no timetable on arrival.  
 

meanwhile I’m driving my leaky truck still. Thankfully no rain until later this week, but would it be unreasonable to request a loaner while they are waiting on sealant? 
 

any other tips to speed this process along? 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Centrebaseball said:

Just a quick follow up. Called two dealers close to my house.  One said they couldn’t get me in to see anyone for 10 days. The other took me in that day and looked and ordered the sealant and headliner but no timetable on arrival.  
 

meanwhile I’m driving my leaky truck still. Thankfully no rain until later this week, but would it be unreasonable to request a loaner while they are waiting on sealant? 
 

any other tips to speed this process along? 

No.  Just go with the flow.  Be nice but firm with them about doing a quality job because otherwise it just produces duplication of effort, and ain't nobody got time for that!

Posted

If it leaks, and it's going to be a week or more to get parts, the dealer should be keeping it parked inside and give you a loaner. Those are days out of service you will need to aquire to get lemon law leverage for a buy back. Mine was at the dealer 42 days, most of which was waiting for parts. I drove about 6 different 2019 Silverado loaners, no questions asked courtesy of gm

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

Dealer gave me my truck back saying that they have an alert out there for a new back window assembly. Hopefully parts will start flowing back in with the strike over. 

 

Leaks, but my headliner is not getting soaked like some of the guys pics I've seen.

Edited by mattsvtcobra
Posted
16 hours ago, mattsvtcobra said:

Dealer gave me my truck back saying that they have an alert out there for a new back window assembly. Hopefully parts will start flowing back in with the strike over. 

 

Leaks, but my headliner is not getting soaked like some of the guys pics I've seen.

I noticed that you had the leak late october. Did the dealership go straight to a new window for you? Or did they try the sealing first and it failed?

Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, Centrebaseball said:

So they are doing the new window assembly straight out of the gate, or have you failed the silicone sealing already?

Unless you know someone who has a lot of pull with GM, they will do the silicone first, then another sealer if that doesn't work and then, maybe then they will replace the window. 

Edited by eppieguy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,978 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...