Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, C Gerber said:

A friend of ours works at the Fort Wayne plant, and I heard him mention that they had engineers there at the plant for several months trying to figure out the issue and how to fix it. I didn't ask him whether they ever think they found a fix, but based on this thread, I have to assume they never did. I will have to keep an eye on our 2020 Denali and I wish I had known about this before our purchase. :(

It would be great to know, but yea the latest builds are still having these issues, I think there was a 2021 in here with a leaking rear.  Had to be 9/20 build or later.  Let us know if you chat with him again and can get any other information.  Several months is a long time lol...

Posted

Is the Trim Lok cord that others have used too large in diameter to push in around the rear window.  Was thinking of trying that instead of caulk or sealant due to the temps in PA right now.  There seems to be enough of a gar around the window to do it.

Posted
2 hours ago, SPASierra said:

Is the Trim Lok cord that others have used too large in diameter to push in around the rear window.  Was thinking of trying that instead of caulk or sealant due to the temps in PA right now.  There seems to be enough of a gar around the window to do it.

I purchased the one someone linked to on here and it didn't work for me. I was able to get it in (between edge of glass and body) but once in, the gap between the back of the glass and frame was wider than .25 inch.

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, hydrofoam said:

I purchased the one someone linked to on here and it didn't work for me. I was able to get it in (between edge of glass and body) but once in, the gap between the back of the glass and frame was wider than .25 inch.

 

 

I would go to their website and find one that will fit that gap. The one that the other guy linked on here was for the upper gap of the spoiler. I'm sure they have one that will fit the bigger gap of the window. Then you can go to a place like Home Depot or Levine's Auto or something and find that bigger size. Might work... Here is the link to the website of the people that make all this stuff...

 

https://www.trimlok.com/

 

Hope this helps...

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Dali555 said:

I would go to their website and find one that will fit that gap. The one that the other guy linked on here was for the upper gap of the spoiler. I'm sure they have one that will fit the bigger gap of the window. Then you can go to a place like Home Depot or Levine's Auto or something and find that bigger size. Might work... Here is the link to the website of the people that make all this stuff...

 

https://www.trimlok.com/

 

Hope this helps...

 

Thanks Dali555.  I am going to check that out, and see if I can Amazon a slightly larger diameter size.  With a black truck I don't think it is going to stick out like a sore thumb, at least as a temporary solution.

Posted

Got my truck back after a week and a half. I’ll have to take a better look tomorrow as it was dark when I picked it up. I’ve attached a pic of the new glass numbers as well as the top of the frame and a pic of the old frame... slight difference

5478EF1E-4609-474F-9E44-9564BB8CEE8E.jpeg

E1749AFF-5FBA-4E92-8E50-936AB0BED478.jpeg

78967E36-7BE9-4230-87B8-2099C1306D30.jpeg

Posted
4 hours ago, Dali555 said:

Got my truck back after a week and a half. I’ll have to take a better look tomorrow as it was dark when I picked it up. I’ve attached a pic of the new glass numbers as well as the top of the frame and a pic of the old frame... slight difference

5478EF1E-4609-474F-9E44-9564BB8CEE8E.jpeg

E1749AFF-5FBA-4E92-8E50-936AB0BED478.jpeg

78967E36-7BE9-4230-87B8-2099C1306D30.jpeg

 

Nice to see some physical changes being done to address the issue. Hope it’s the fix everyone’s been waiting for. 

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Z71RAD88 said:

 

Nice to see some physical changes being done to address the issue. Hope it’s the fix everyone’s been waiting for. 

Looks like the same series as my 06/20 build:

?

IMG_2187.jpg

IMG_2191.jpg

Edited by Spyderwebb
Posted
10 minutes ago, Spyderwebb said:

Looks like the same series as my 07/20 build:

?

IMG_2187.jpg

IMG_2191.jpg

 

The frame looked to be a little thicker when I intitally looked at the OP’s pictures. No?

Posted

I guess I have been lucky. Mine is not leaking. And I live in rainy Seattle. How do you know the build date on the truck?

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk

Posted

This is the first time I've seen the FUYAO E4's without the "wing". Historically, the FUYAO E2's did not have the wing, but the FUYAO E4's and the VIRTO E9's did. 

If that is the case, then they are mixing glass versions with frame types.  ??? 

 

image.png.1827db914f18430f59a6cbf36705e815.png

Posted
55 minutes ago, UGADawgs said:

This is the first time I've seen the FUYAO E4's without the "wing". Historically, the FUYAO E2's did not have the wing, but the FUYAO E4's and the VIRTO E9's did. 

If that is the case, then they are mixing glass versions with frame types.  ??? 

 

image.png.1827db914f18430f59a6cbf36705e815.png

Is the wing the "redesigned" part?

 

Posted

Interesting. My E2 has a wing but it looks different. 10/2018 build. Goes without saying that it leaks. ?D1653685-F820-4593-9F39-56ACBBE9BE4F.thumb.jpeg.e528d1203a1eecc06218cd48b0e13e8e.jpeg4C03E1EA-A17D-4558-B20C-26F9CACF3907.thumb.jpeg.ed79e7c7d109503f2a2b306be107686e.jpeg

Posted
2 hours ago, SPASierra said:

Is the wing the "redesigned" part?

 

No, the wing is my original window and the other is the new redesigned window.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Counterpoint.   There is no used EV trucks on the market sub $30,000 with low mileage or no mileage.  Cheapest F150 Lightning I can find is $30,500 and its got 66,000mi.  Next cheapest was $33,000 and had 81,000mi.  So going on 5 years old, and that leaves only 2-3 years left of battery warranty, or 20,000-40,000mi left of that time.     Maverick has the hybrid but its still ICE, and Colorado/Canyon/Frontier/Tacoma/Ranger are all ICE.  If someone was set on an EV, they wouldn't cross shop.  
    • Oil change before Thursday's track day at NCM    
    • $2.69 yesterday.  Definitely dropping fast here.  
    • My nephews 7.3 got noisy right around 100K miles. While replacing the engine he drove his old 6.0 Chevy that had over 200K miles on it. It an old reliable backup. I haven’t been around the old shop lately. I’m curious to find out if there using the new GM heavy duty gas.
    • I don't know if you or anyone enjoys it or not but, why not share it. It's GM "truck" related and we're in the right place to discuss that 😉 I'm also working on some creative writing skills, I'm not quitting my day job to pursue that, either!   As I said, I've hit a wall because I'm not making any progress, and the progress is the fun part for me.   The idler pulley and EGR valve came in. Against better judgement, I went out there last night and put both of them in. I was able to get a nut on the back of the bolt on the side with the broken flange. There's enough flange still there that I can get that side of the EGR to snug down. It's not perfect, it's not "right", but this is the fix I have for now. If I decide to keep the rig, I talked to a guy locally who will sell me a complete intake for $100. If it's my truck, a broken flange like that would bug me too much. Yes, I'm crazy. But I embrace it.   Pulley on, EGR installed, started the truck. Great...still have a pulley squeaking like mad. That was the first disappointment. I thought I had pinpointed the problem. Before I replaced it, I sprayed the back of that pulley with PTFE and it would shut up for about 30 seconds. Is the squeak actually the belt? I'm frustrated.   SO then I decided why not disappoint myself twice, so I took it for a spin and sure enough, the CEL set for P0401 insufficient EGR flow again.   I had some extra time, so when I arrived home, I decided to ask AI about my EGR code. We had an interesting conversation.   I asked how to tell if my MAP sensor is bad and if that could be setting an EGR code since a bad MAP may not be sensing the requisite drop in manifold pressure when the EGR activates. I gave it the MAP value at idle and it told me to blip the throttle hard and watch the MAP reading. It said no, the values appear normal and it's reactive to pressure changes, and then instructed me to test voltage at the harness. I don't think it's the MAP sensor. Interesting, though, I gave it MAP reading values in inHg, and it thought I was using PSI, so I had to correct it. AI is a very dangerous tool if you aren't treating it like the machine that it is.   Then it walked me through testing the EGR and harness. It took me down an interesting path. It was referencing a gray wire and a white wire so I told it I can't tell the difference on my harness because it's dirty and old and both could be white or gray, I'm not sure. So it gave me a more accurate description of the ABCDE pins on the connector and started referencing pins instead of colors. Helpful.   The EGR harness has 12v power, and it also has 5v reference power from the PCM. What I'm unclear on is there's a ground wire and I thought AI had said that one of my tests revealed the ground in the harness was likely bad and it instructed me to wire a test ground. I got distracted and navigated away from the AI conversation, and when I went back and asked for clarification it said I must have misunderstood. (how rude- next time I'm saving the conversation!)   But I think it was onto something. I recall NOT getting 12v when I tested the power wire to the ground wire, but I did when I tested the power wire, grounding the voltmeter to the engine block. AI said no, the ground wire is actually for the PCM, that's how it commands the EGR on by grounding it and so the circuit should be open with the key on (i.e. EGR off). But I think there's also a static/overall ground that should always be grounded, and if that's bad, then the EGR isn't activating when the PCM commands it on, and thus setting the code.   There's a bunch of other tests it suggested, back-probing with the EGR plugged in and engine running. I need to get some time to focus, and not just tinkering after a long day.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...