Jump to content

Tire size suggestions and pics on AT4/Trail Boss

mattsvtcobra
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Drew03Z
Drew03Z

Well, I’ve been trolling several threads here and finally got her done. Took delivery of a Pacific Blue AT4, 6.2L, with 18s, intake/exhaust. I initially wanted to go with BFG 35/12.5/18 (34.5 inc

MTBeerz
MTBeerz

35x11.50r18 Toyo Open Country AT II Rough Country 1.5" level kit was necessary but no rubbing whatsoever.

FLDrJoe
FLDrJoe

Just put Nitto Grappler G2s on my 2019 Sierra SLT this weekend 285/65/20 on factory rims to replace the original 275/60/20.  Really fills up wheelwell better as it is 1.6 inch more in diameter.  Reall

Posted Images

z1boss Enthusiast

z1boss

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, HopHedd said:

They're are some good reviews on both the AT and the MT.

 

https://www.offroadxtreme.com/engine-tech/wheels-tires/tire-review-mickey-thompson-deegan-38-all-terrain

I have the Mickey Thompson MTZ.  Best tire I have ever owned.  My current set has about 37k miles on the tires and they still look like almost new and have about 14-15/32 of tread left

  • 3 weeks later...
TripleBGM Enthusiast

TripleBGM

Posted
Posted (edited)

I hate the druatrac tires.  Anyone running the 285/60/20 ko2s on the AT4 all stock?  I think I'm going to get the OE 20s.

Edited by TripleBGM
  • 2 months later...
Rosshog Enthusiast

Rosshog

Posted
Posted
On 4/10/2019 at 7:36 PM, FLDrJoe said:

Very rare rub noted on passenger side fender inside of lower molded flap on sharp right turn only when going up a slight curb or bump. Otherwise no issues 

Did you happen to have these tires mounted before you put on the RC leveling kit?  I have a bone stock AT4 without a leveling kit, so I'm wondering if 285/65/20 will work.  TIA.

FLDrJoe Enthusiast

FLDrJoe

Posted
Posted

Did GM Accessories lift at delivery to make it the equivalent of an AT4 then did the front leveling and ran the stock 275/60/20 for a little while before going to the 285/65/20.  I know lots of people running the 285/65/20 on TrailBoss and AT4s on factory rims with no problems actually think they may get a little less rub

mattsvtcobra Enthusiast

mattsvtcobra

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 4/9/2019 at 12:15 PM, BringTheRain403 said:

Does anyone know if the 295/55R20 Nitto Ridge Grapplers will fit without any modifications on a stock AT4 with stock wheels.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

Has anyone done this yet? Pics would be awesome.

killramos Enthusiast

killramos

Posted
Posted

Didn’t read all 5 pages, and this might all sound pretty cute compared to the 35+ many and running in here but...

 

Has anyone else noticed that the off road performance package duratracs are actually smaller than the stock AT4 tires?

 

33’s stock and 32’s on the off road pack... frustrating.

  • Like 1
  • 5 weeks later...
  • 11 months later...
ScX31 Enthusiast

ScX31

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 9/9/2019 at 4:48 PM, Rosshog said:

Did you happen to have these tires mounted before you put on the RC leveling kit?  I have a bone stock AT4 without a leveling kit, so I'm wondering if 285/65/20 will work.  TIA.

I’ll save you some trouble. I put this size on my Sierra with a 2” level and could hardly turn without major running. I ended up heavily modding the fender wells and made them fit  but it was a pain. I’d go 286/60/20 on a stock AT4

 

 

3BC9EF68-D63E-42C1-B9D0-2FD22505FF8B.jpeg

Edited by ScX31
  • Like 1
  • 2 years later...
Josh021 Enthusiast

Josh021

Posted
Posted

Running 275\65r20 stock rims 2" spacers. I installed the factory at4 lift along with the readylify 2" sst. Just ordered 17" pro comp wheels with 4.5" backset. with 35x12.50x17 nemon power xt husky liners and and fox shocks and a back rack. Cant wait to see how it turns out. Here's a few pics of it as of now. Lost a visor in a windstorm 120 km and hour max windspeed.

IMG_20230208_113139_312.jpg

IMG_20230208_113139_271.jpg

IMG_20230202_082936.jpg

IMG_20230208_113139_233.jpg

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted

Thoughts on 285/75r18 on stock Trail Boss?  Rubbing, etc??  That's pretty close to a 35, and not much wider than the OE Duratracs.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • James Beyer
      Trading 7.3 (Godzilla) for G.M.C gas

      By James Beyer · Posted

      Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...