Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Had Rams with the 5.7 Hemi for the last two trucks, and now I’m thinking about getting a trail boss, or RST which ever is more affordable for what I want. I love the hemi and feel the 5.3 lacks some acceleration so I was thinking about getting my first diesel, but I’m not sure if it will be worth it. It looks like I would only save a few bucks at the pump, and I’m sure cost for the diesel option won’t be cheap. Would you guys go for the 3.0 over the 5.3, and why?

Posted

If it were me, I’d buy the 5.3

 

#1. It’s proven to be a great half ton engine

#2 it’s not the first of its generation

#3 gas is cheaper than diesel (region may vary greatly)

 

Id sure be interested to hear any guesses about why the 3.0 diesel would be anything better then a novelty option 

  • Like 2
Posted

Outside of HD trucks, diesels are not fast. It'll be slow but pull like a freight train. The engine will likely add $3000-$4000 to the sticker and as was already said, diesel tends to be more expensive. I'm not sold on diesels in the light duty trucks. It's a tough spot. I want to get back into a pickup myself this spring and I'm a Chevy fan but as much as I like the concept of the Trail Boss, GM has left a lot out of these trucks, including removing stuff 2018s had. Really makes me look toward Ford and Ram. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/26/2018 at 3:56 PM, Bulldog4xFour said:

Had Rams with the 5.7 Hemi for the last two trucks, and now I’m thinking about getting a trail boss, or RST which ever is more affordable for what I want. I love the hemi and feel the 5.3 lacks some acceleration so I was thinking about getting my first diesel, but I’m not sure if it will be worth it. It looks like I would only save a few bucks at the pump, and I’m sure cost for the diesel option won’t be cheap. Would you guys go for the 3.0 over the 5.3, and why?

Bulldog, to piggy back off of what Mizzou said, go the 5.3 route. These new GM trucks with the 5.3 have some zip to them. I was screwing around with a ram before I got my lift on and chirped the tires real nice going into 2nd gear.

 

GM did a weight reduction in this body style so the 5.3L performs way better than in the previous years. 

Posted

I test drove a LT yesterday with a 6” procomp lift, 20” wheels, and 35” MTs. I’m not really into the 6” lift, I would prefer a 3”, but I wanted to test drive it to see how it felt with such a big lift and tires. I was actually really surprised by how smooth the ride was. The 5.3 was no rocket ship, but it didn’t feel dogged down either. After seeing what you guys said, and test driving it im starting to feel like the 5.3 is the way to go.

Posted

+ 1 on the weight reduction. All things being equal, the new 2019 5.3 trucks should be quicker.  Interesting thing is the same can't be said for the new 6.2 -  most are reporting the same if not slower numbers. Not sure why.. likely the 10 speed those 6.2 trucks come with is to blame.  

Posted
On 1/5/2019 at 11:39 AM, GMC-AT said:

+ 1 on the weight reduction. All things being equal, the new 2019 5.3 trucks should be quicker.  Interesting thing is the same can't be said for the new 6.2 -  most are reporting the same if not slower numbers. Not sure why.. likely the 10 speed those 6.2 trucks come with is to blame.  

The 10 speed is used in the F150 too and that’s a rocket ship. Doesn’t GM use something stupid like 3.23s in the diffs of the 10 speed trucks? That’s why it’s neutered. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I have had 3-6.2L GMC's.  A 2013 with the 6Sp, a 2018 with the 8sp and a new AT4 with the 10 speed.      Trust me, the 2019 runs better and is a little faster in my 1/4mile test track.............Some of the posts on here are real brilliant...............

Posted

I have a 2019 Sprinter with a 3.0 diesel, from what I have heard it is similar to other 3.0 diesels. its my first smaller displacement diesel, I have been able to spend time driving and hauling with. It drives very nice but it is in no way fast. phenomenal torque great for towing/hauling/MPG. but I would take a 5.3 or preferably a 6.2 in a personal pickup, no doubt.

Posted

How many miles a year do you drive? Tow frequently? I currently have a Ram 1500 diesel, and am seriously looking at the AT4. Fuel is more, fuel water separator needs to be replaced periodically, oil changes are more, takes a lot longer to warm up in colder climates, Diesel Exhaust Fluid and the lovely EGR, DPF, SCR systems and regen. Don’t get me wrong I love my truck, but for the little I’m using it to pull, and the difference in mileage vs fuel cost (almost a dollar more per gallon here) it is definitely more expensive to drive


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 12/26/2018 at 2:56 PM, Bulldog4xFour said:

Had Rams with the 5.7 Hemi for the last two trucks, and now I’m thinking about getting a trail boss, or RST which ever is more affordable for what I want. I love the hemi and feel the 5.3 lacks some acceleration so I was thinking about getting my first diesel, but I’m not sure if it will be worth it. It looks like I would only save a few bucks at the pump, and I’m sure cost for the diesel option won’t be cheap. Would you guys go for the 3.0 over the 5.3, and why?

Had my new 3L for about 5 weeks replacing a 14 5.3.  Averaging about 26 (mixed driving) mpg and have much better acceleration. Looking forward to 5th wheel towing in a few days. Love the new truck in spite of the sh..ty dealership in Tucson that Costco sent me to.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/30/2018 at 12:22 PM, MikeNH said:

Outside of HD trucks, diesels are not fast. It'll be slow but pull like a freight train. The engine will likely add $3000-$4000 to the sticker and as was already said, diesel tends to be more expensive. I'm not sold on diesels in the light duty trucks. It's a tough spot. I want to get back into a pickup myself this spring and I'm a Chevy fan but as much as I like the concept of the Trail Boss, GM has left a lot out of these trucks, including removing stuff 2018s had. Really makes me look toward Ford and Ram. 

TFL Truck had a drag race with the 5.3 vs 3.0 and the 3.0 killed the 5.3

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 1/16/2019 at 2:16 PM, KMGZ400 said:

I have a 2019 Sprinter with a 3.0 diesel, from what I have heard it is similar to other 3.0 diesels. its my first smaller displacement diesel, I have been able to spend time driving and hauling with. It drives very nice but it is in no way fast. phenomenal torque great for towing/hauling/MPG. but I would take a 5.3 or preferably a 6.2 in a personal pickup, no doubt.

I have a 2019 sprinter also for work and a duramax 3.0 daily. The duramax blows the sprinter engine out of the water. Test drive the gm variant you will be surprised. 

Posted (edited)

Haters had to hate, even though the comments were all before the 3.0 finally became available to drive.....

 

A lot of things have changed in the diesel world since the change from mechanical injection pump systems to the very high pressure common rail systems with electronic injection, and the development of variable gate turbos.

 

Probably a bigger difference that switching from carburetors to fuel injection in the gas engine world.

 

 

"If you want one or don't want one, you're right."

 

If one engine was right for everyone, they wouldn't still offer 6 of them.

 

 

 

Edited by redwngr
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 3/8/2020 at 12:13 PM, Chrisd534 said:

TFL Truck had a drag race with the 5.3 vs 3.0 and the 3.0 killed the 5.3

 

 

Yeah but they do that test up in the mountains. Most of us live a few thousand feet closer to sea level. And it still isn't worth the thousands more you'll pay for it.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I find it amusing the OP doesn’t realize this threads heading includes several engines. He should have posted in the off topic section if he wanted a more narrow focus. I really appreciate and find amusing that he actually pointed out one of my many vehicles. The Odyssey. That happens to use 0-20 oil. I love pushing his buttons. 
    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...