Jump to content

How fast (slow lol) is the 5.3L 2WD


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, njk4o5 said:

i wouldnt doubt it they certainly feel alot slower than other brands

Compared to?  The 5.3L is the base motor in some of the truck models.  It's significantly slower than the 6.2L.

 

E85 and a proper tune will wake it up nicely.  The 5.3L fanbois try to say that will give it the power of the 6.2L but the Dyno proves otherwise...but it does narrow the gap a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot a factors will change its pace, gearing, transmission, cab size, bed size. My 5.3 is a dog and I have done a lot to wake it up. Ultimately its a great platform to build on, but stock has much to be desired. 

 

You can get a ruff Idea below

 

2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Z71 LT: Track Tested

Acceleration
0-30 (sec): 2.6 (3.0 w/ TC on)
0-45 (sec): 4.5 (5.0 w/ TC on)
0-60 (sec): 6.8 (7.2 w/ TC on)
0-60 with 1-ft Rollout (sec): 6.5 (6.8 w/ TC on)
0-75 (sec): 10.2 (10.7 w/ TC on)
1/4-Mile (sec @ mph): 15.0 @ 92.9 ( 15.3 @ 92.7 w/ TC on)

 

Car And Driver

Zero to 60 mph: 6.7 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 18.4 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 7.3 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 4.0 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 4.7 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 15.3 sec @ 92 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 100 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 178 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.77 g

Edited by Mikebtte
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Nitrousbird said:

Compared to?  The 5.3L is the base motor in some of the truck models.  It's significantly slower than the 6.2L.

 

E85 and a proper tune will wake it up nicely.  The 5.3L fanbois try to say that will give it the power of the 6.2L but the Dyno proves otherwise...but it does narrow the gap a lot.

compared to a ram 1500 v8 and ford with the 5.0. hell even the fords with the small ecoboost feel peppier than my shitbox 5.3

yeah i could spend $500 on a tune and drive 33 miles to the nearest e85 station  but at that point might as well just do twin turbos and nitrous while im at it lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, njk4o5 said:

compared to a ram 1500 v8 and ford with the 5.0. hell even the fords with the small ecoboost feel peppier than my shitbox 5.3

yeah i could spend $500 on a tune and drive 33 miles to the nearest e85 station  but at that point might as well just do twin turbos and nitrous while im at it lol

3.5L EcoBoost moves ... not sure how durable twin turbos are going to pan out for durability

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Mikebtte said:

A lot a factors will change its pace, gearing, transmission, cab size, bed size. My 5.3 is a dog and I have done a lot to wake it up. Ultimately its a great platform to build on, but stock has much to be desired. 

 

You can get a ruff Idea below

 

2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Z71 LT: Track Tested

Acceleration
0-30 (sec): 2.6 (3.0 w/ TC on)
0-45 (sec): 4.5 (5.0 w/ TC on)
0-60 (sec): 6.8 (7.2 w/ TC on)
0-60 with 1-ft Rollout (sec): 6.5 (6.8 w/ TC on)
0-75 (sec): 10.2 (10.7 w/ TC on)
1/4-Mile (sec @ mph): 15.0 @ 92.9 ( 15.3 @ 92.7 w/ TC on)

 

Car And Driver

Zero to 60 mph: 6.7 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 18.4 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 7.3 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 4.0 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 4.7 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 15.3 sec @ 92 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 100 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 178 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.77 g

Didn't expect 15.0s quarter from a stock 5.3l

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.